| 
		House gives final approval to Trump's $9 billion cut to public 
		broadcasting and foreign aid
		[July 18, 2025]  
		By KEVIN FREKING and MARY CLARE JALONICK 
		WASHINGTON (AP) — The House gave final approval to President Donald 
		Trump's request to claw back about $9 billion for public broadcasting 
		and foreign aid early Friday as Republicans intensified their efforts to 
		target institutions and programs they view as bloated or out of step 
		with their agenda.
 The vote marked the first time in decades that a president has 
		successfully submitted such a rescissions request to Congress, and the 
		White House suggested it won't be the last. Some Republicans were 
		uncomfortable with the cuts, yet supported them anyway, wary of crossing 
		Trump or upsetting his agenda.
 
 The House passed the bill by a vote of 216-213. It now goes to Trump for 
		his signature.
 
 “We need to get back to fiscal sanity and this is an important step,” 
		said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.
 
 Opponents voiced concerns not only about the programs targeted, but 
		about Congress ceding its spending powers to the executive branch as 
		investments approved on a bipartisan basis were being subsequently 
		canceled on party-line votes. They said previous rescission efforts had 
		at least some bipartisan buy-in and described the Republican package as 
		unprecedented.
 
 No Democrats supported the measure when it passed the Senate, 51-48, in 
		the early morning hours Thursday. Final passage in the House was delayed 
		for several hours as Republicans wrestled with their response to 
		Democrats' push for a vote on the release of Jeffrey Epstein files.
 
 The package cancels about $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public 
		Broadcasting and nearly $8 billion for a variety of foreign aid 
		programs, many designed to help countries where drought, disease and 
		political unrest endure.
 
 
		
		 
		The effort to claw back a sliver of federal spending came just weeks 
		after Republicans also muscled through Trump’s tax and spending cut bill 
		without any Democratic support. The Congressional Budget Office has 
		projected that measure will increase the U.S. debt by about $3.3 
		trillion over the coming decade.
 
 "No one is buying the the notion that Republicans are actually trying to 
		improve wasteful spending,” said Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries.
 
 A heavy blow to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
 
 The cancellation of $1.1 billion for the CPB represents the full amount 
		it is due to receive during the next two budget years.
 
 The White House says the public media system is politically biased and 
		an unnecessary expense.
 
 The corporation distributes more than two-thirds of the money to more 
		than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with 
		much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public 
		Broadcasting Service to support national programming.
 
 Democrats were unsuccessful in restoring the funding in the Senate.
 
 Lawmakers with large rural constituencies voiced particular concern 
		about what the cuts to public broadcasting could mean for some local 
		public stations in their state.
 
 Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said the stations are "not just your news 
		— it is your tsunami alert, it is your landslide alert, it is your 
		volcano alert.”
 
 As the Senate debated the bill Tuesday, a 7.3 magnitude earthquake 
		struck off the remote Alaska Peninsula, triggering tsunami warnings on 
		local public broadcasting stations that advised people to get to higher 
		ground.
 
 Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he secured a deal from the White House 
		that some money administered by the Interior Department would be 
		repurposed to subsidize Native American public radio stations in about a 
		dozen states.
 
 But Kate Riley, president and CEO of America’s Public Television 
		Stations, a network of locally owned and operated stations, said that 
		deal was “at best a short-term, half-measure that will still result in 
		cuts and reduced service at the stations it purports to save.”
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, a member of the conservative House Freedom 
			Caucus, pauses before a TV news interviews at the Capitol in 
			Washington, Thursday, July 17, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) 
            
			 
            Inside the cuts to foreign aid
 Among the foreign aid cuts are $800 million for a program that 
			provides emergency shelter, water and family reunification for 
			refugees and $496 million to provide food, water and health care for 
			countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts. There also is a 
			$4.15 billion cut for programs that aim to boost economies and 
			democratic institutions in developing nations.
 
 Democrats argued that the Republican administration's animus toward 
			foreign aid programs would hurt America's standing in the world and 
			create a vacuum for China to fill.
 
 “This is not an America first bill. It's a China first bill because 
			of the void that's being created all across the world,” Jeffries 
			said.
 
 The White House argued that many of the cuts would incentivize other 
			nations to step up and do more to respond to humanitarian crises and 
			that the rescissions best served the American taxpayer.
 
 “The money that we're clawing back in this rescissions package is 
			the people's money. We ought not to forget that,” said Rep. Virginia 
			Foxx, R-N.C., chair of the House Rules Committee.
 
 After objections from several Republicans, Senate GOP leaders took 
			out a $400 million cut to PEPFAR, a politically popular program to 
			combat HIV/AIDS that is credited with saving millions of lives since 
			its creation under Republican President George W. Bush.
 
 Looking ahead to future spending fights
 
 Democrats say the bill upends a legislative process that typically 
			requires lawmakers from both parties to work together to fund the 
			nation’s priorities.
 
 Triggered by the official rescissions request from the White House, 
			the legislation only needed a simple majority vote to advance in the 
			Senate instead of the 60 votes usually required to break a 
			filibuster. That meant Republicans could use their 53-47 majority to 
			pass it along party lines.
 
 Two Republican senators, Murkowski and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, 
			joined with Democrats in voting against the bill, though a few other 
			Republicans also raised concerns about the process.
 
 “Let’s not make a habit of this,” said Senate Armed Services 
			Committee Chairman Roger Wicker of Mississippi, who voted for the 
			bill but said he was wary that the White House wasn’t providing 
			enough information on what exactly will be cut.
 
 Russ Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, 
			said the imminent successful passage of the rescissions shows 
			“enthusiasm” for getting the nation’s fiscal situation under 
			control.
 
 “We’re happy to go to great lengths to get this thing done,” he said 
			during a breakfast with reporters hosted by the Christian Science 
			Monitor.
 
            
			 
			In response to questions about the relatively small size of the cuts 
			-- $9 billion -- Vought said that was because “I knew it would be 
			hard” to pass in Congress. Vought said another rescissions package 
			is ’likely to come soon.”
 ___
 
 Associated Press writers Becky Bohrer in Juneau, Alaska, and Seung 
			Min Kim contributed to this report.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |