| 
		Request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts likely to disappoint, 
		ex-prosecutors say
		[July 21, 2025]  
		By LARRY NEUMEISTER 
		NEW YORK (AP) — A Justice Department request to unseal grand jury 
		transcripts in the prosecution of chronic sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein 
		and his former girlfriend is unlikely to produce much, if anything, to 
		satisfy the public’s appetite for new revelations about the financier’s 
		crimes, former federal prosecutors say.
 Attorney Sarah Krissoff, an assistant U.S. attorney in Manhattan from 
		2008 to 2021, called the request in the prosecutions of Epstein and 
		imprisoned British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell “a distraction.”
 
 “ The president is trying to present himself as if he’s doing something 
		here and it really is nothing,” Krissoff told The Associated Press in a 
		weekend interview.
 
 Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche made the request Friday, asking 
		judges to unseal transcripts from grand jury proceedings that resulted 
		in indictments against Epstein and Maxwell, saying “transparency to the 
		American public is of the utmost importance to this Administration.”
 
 The request came as the administration sought to contain the firestorm 
		that followed its announcement that it would not be releasing additional 
		files from the Epstein probe despite previously promising that it would.
 
 Epstein is dead while Maxwell serves a 20-year prison sentence
 
 Epstein killed himself at age 66 in his federal jail cell in August 
		2019, a month after his arrest on sex trafficking charges, while 
		Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year prison sentence imposed after her 
		December 2021 sex trafficking conviction for luring girls to be sexually 
		abused by Epstein.
 
 Krissoff and Joshua Naftalis, a Manhattan federal prosecutor for 11 
		years before entering private practice in 2023, said grand jury 
		presentations are purposely brief.
 
 Naftalis said Southern District prosecutors present just enough to a 
		grand jury to get an indictment but “it’s not going to be everything the 
		FBI and investigators have figured out about Maxwell and Epstein.”
 
		
		 
		“People want the entire file from however long. That’s just not what 
		this is,” he said, estimating that the transcripts, at most, probably 
		amount to a few hundred pages.
 “It’s not going to be much,” Krissoff said, estimating the length at as 
		little as 60 pages “because the Southern District of New York's practice 
		is to put as little information as possible into the grand jury.”
 
 “They basically spoon feed the indictment to the grand jury. That’s what 
		we’re going to see,” she said. “I just think it’s not going to be that 
		interesting. ... I don’t think it’s going to be anything new.”
 
 Ex-prosecutors say grand jury transcript unlikely to be long
 
 Both ex-prosecutors said that grand jury witnesses in Manhattan are 
		usually federal agents summarizing their witness interviews.
 
 That practice might conflict with the public perception of some state 
		and federal grand jury proceedings, where witnesses likely to testify at 
		a trial are brought before grand juries during lengthy proceedings prior 
		to indictments or when grand juries are used as an investigatory tool.
 
 In Manhattan, federal prosecutors “are trying to get a particular result 
		so they present the case very narrowly and inform the grand jury what 
		they want them to do,” Krissoff said.
 
 Krissoff predicted that judges who presided over the Epstein and Maxwell 
		cases will reject the government's request.
 
 With Maxwell, a petition is before the U.S. Supreme Court so appeals 
		have not been exhausted. With Epstein, the charges are related to the 
		Maxwell case and the anonymity of scores of victims who have not gone 
		public is at stake, although Blanche requested that victim identities be 
		protected.
 
 “This is not a 50-, 60-, 80-year-old case,” Krissoff noted. “There’s 
		still someone in custody.”
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            This photo combination shows from top left, Assistant U.S. Attorney 
			Maurene Comey listening in New York, July 8, 2019, attorney Todd 
			Blanche after a hearing, Sept. 5, 2024, in Washington, Attorney 
			General Pam Bondi speaking during a news conference at the Justice 
			Department, June 6, 2025, in Washington and and President Donald 
			Trump speaking at an event in the East Room of the White House, July 
			18, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, Jose Luis Magana, 
			Julia Demaree Nikhinson, Alex Brandon, file) 
            
			
			
			 
            Appeals court's 1997 ruling might matter
 She said citing “public intrigue, interest and excitement” about a 
			case was likely not enough to convince a judge to release the 
			transcripts despite a 1997 ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of 
			Appeals that said judges have wide discretion and that public 
			interest alone can justify releasing grand jury information.
 
 Krissoff called it “mind-blowingly strange” that Washington Justice 
			Department officials are increasingly directly filing requests and 
			arguments in the Southern District of New York, where the 
			prosecutor's office has long been labeled the "Sovereign District of 
			New York" for its independence from outside influence.
 
 “To have the attorney general and deputy attorney general meddling 
			in an SDNY case is unheard of,” she said.
 
 Cheryl Bader, a former federal prosecutor and Fordham Law School 
			criminal law professor, said judges who presided over the Epstein 
			and Maxwell cases may take weeks or months to rule.
 
 “Especially here where the case involved witnesses or victims of 
			sexual abuse, many of which are underage, the judge is going to be 
			very cautious about what the judge releases,” she said.
 
 Tradition of grand jury secrecy might block release of 
			transcripts
 
 Bader said she didn't see the government's quest aimed at satisfying 
			the public's desire to explore conspiracy theories “trumping — 
			pardon the pun — the well-established notions of protecting the 
			secrecy of the grand jury process.”
 
 “I’m sure that all the line prosecutors who really sort of 
			appreciate the secrecy and special relationship they have with the 
			grand jury are not happy that DOJ is asking the court to release 
			these transcripts,” she added.
 
 Mitchell Epner, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice, 
			called Trump's comments and influence in the Epstein matter 
			“unprecedented” and “extraordinarily unusual” because he is a 
			sitting president.
 
 He said it was not surprising that some former prosecutors are 
			alarmed that the request to unseal the grand jury materials came two 
			days after the firing of Manhattan Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene 
			Comey, who worked on the Epstein and Maxwell cases.
 
            
			 
			“If federal prosecutors have to worry about the professional 
			consequences of refusing to go along with the political or personal 
			agenda of powerful people, then we are in a very different place 
			than I’ve understood the federal Department of Justice to be in over 
			the last 30 years of my career,” he said.
 Krissoff said the uncertain environment that has current prosecutors 
			feeling unsettled is shared by government employees she speaks with 
			at other agencies as part of her work in private practice.
 
 “The thing I hear most often is this is a strange time. Things 
			aren’t working the way we’re used to them working,” she said.
 ___
 
 Associated Press Writers Eric Tucker and Alanna Durkin Richer 
			contributed to this report
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |