San Francisco to ban homeless people from living in RVs with new parking
limit
[July 22, 2025]
By JANIE HAR and TERRY CHEA
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — San Francisco is set to ban homeless people from
living in RVs by adopting strict new parking limits the mayor says are
necessary to keep sidewalks clear and prevent trash buildup.
The policy, up for final approval by San Francisco supervisors Tuesday,
targets at least 400 recreational vehicles in the city of 800,000
people. The RVs serve as shelter for people who can't afford housing,
including immigrant families with kids.
Those who live in them say they're a necessary option in an expensive
city where affordable apartments are impossible to find. But Mayor
Daniel Lurie and other supporters of the policy say motor homes are not
suitable for long-term living and the city has a duty to both provide
shelter to those in need and clean up the streets.
“We absolutely want to serve those families, those who are in crisis
across San Francisco,” said Kunal Modi, who advises the mayor on health,
homelessness and family services. “We feel the responsibility to help
them get to a stable solution. And at the same time, we want to make
sure that that stability is somewhere indoors and not exposed in the
public roadway.”
Critics of the plan, however, say that it's cruel to force people to
give up their only home in exchange for a shot at traditional housing
when there is not nearly enough units for all the people who need help;
the mayor is only offering additional money to help 65 households.
Jennifer Friedenbach, executive director of the Coalition on
Homelessness, says city officials are woefully behind on establishing
details of an accompanying permit program, which will exempt RV
residents from parking limits so long as they are working with homeless
outreach staff to find housing.
“I think that there’s going to be people who lose their RVs. I think
there’s going to be people who are able to get into shelter, but at the
expense" of people with higher needs, like those sleeping on a sidewalk,
she said.
San Francisco, like other U.S. cities, has seen an explosion in recent
years of people living out of vehicles and RVs as the cost of living has
risen. Banning oversized vehicles is part of Lurie's pledge to clean up
San Francisco streets, and part of a growing trend to require homeless
people to accept offers of shelter or risk arrest or tows.
Strict new rules
The proposal sets a two-hour parking limit citywide for all RVs and
oversized vehicles longer than 22 feet (7 meters) or higher than 7 feet
(2 meters), regardless of whether they are being used as housing.
Under the accompanying permit program, RV residents registered with the
city as of May are exempt from the parking limits. In exchange, they
must accept the city's offer of temporary or longer-term housing, and
get rid of their RV when it's time to move. The city has budgeted more
than half a million dollars to buy RVs from residents at $175 per foot.
The permits will last for six months. People in RVs who arrive after May
will not be eligible for the permit program and must abide by the
two-hour rule, which makes it impossible for a family in an RV to live
within city limits.
It first cleared the Board of Supervisors last week with two of 11
supervisors voting “no.”
[to top of second column]
|
Parked RVs are seen on Lake Merced Boulevard in San Francisco,
Tuesday, July 15, 2025. (AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez)
RV dwellers can't afford rent
Carlos Perez, 55, was among RV residents who told supervisors at a
hearing this month that they could not afford the city's high rents.
Perez works full-time as a produce deliveryman and supports his
brother, who lives with him and is unable to work due to a
disability.
“We don’t do nothing wrong. We try to keep this street clean,” he
said, as he showed his RV recently to an Associated Press
journalist. “It’s not easy to be in a place like this.”
Yet, Perez also loves where he lives. The green-colored RV is
decorated with a homey houseplant and has a sink and a tiny stove on
which Carlos simmered a bean soup on a recent afternoon.
He's lived in San Francisco for more than 30 years, roughly a decade
of which has been in the RV in the working-class Bayview
neighborhood. He can walk to work and it is close to the hospital
where his brother receives dialysis multiple times a week.
Zach, another RV resident who requested being identified by his
first name to not jeopardize his ability to get work, started living
in the vehicle a dozen years ago after realizing that no matter how
hard he worked, he still struggled to pay rent.
Now he works as a ride-hail driver and pursues his love of
photography. He parks near Lake Merced in the city near the Pacific
Ocean and pays $35 every two to four weeks to properly dispose of
waste and fill the vehicle with fresh water.
He says Lurie's plan is shortsighted. There is not enough housing
available and many prefer to live in an RV over staying at a
shelter, which may have restrictive rules. For Zach, who is
able-bodied, maintains a clean space and has no dependents, moving
to a shelter would be a step down, he says. Still, he expects to
receive a permit.
“If housing were affordable, there is a very good chance I wouldn’t
be out here,” he said.
City recently closed its only RV lot
RV dwellers say San Francisco should open a safe parking lot where
residents could empty trash and access electricity. But city
officials shuttered an RV lot in April, saying it cost about $4
million a year to service three dozen large vehicles and it failed
to transition people to more stable housing.
The mayor's new proposal comes with more money for beefed-up RV
parking enforcement — but also an additional $11 million, largely
for a small number of households to move to subsidized housing for a
few years.
Officials acknowledge that may not be sufficient to house all RV
dwellers, but notes that the city also has hotel vouchers and other
housing subsidies.
Erica Kisch, CEO of nonprofit Compass Family Services, which assists
homeless families, says they do not support the punitive nature of
the proposal but are grateful for the extra resources.
“It’s recognition that households should not be living in vehicles,
that we need to do better for families, and for seniors and for
anyone else who's living in a vehicle," she said. “San Francisco can
do better, certainly.”
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |
