| 
		Nevada parental notification abortion law in effect; Planned Parenthood 
		lawsuit seeks halt
		[July 24, 2025] 
		By TABITHA MUELLER AND ANNIE VONG/The Nevada Independent  
		A 40-year-old Nevada law requiring minors having an abortion to first 
		notify their parents or guardians is now in effect for the first time, 
		after a federal district court judge lifted an administrative block 
		Tuesday afternoon.
 The one-page order from District Court Judge Anne Traum came after a 
		federal appellate judge earlier this week opted not to temporarily pause 
		implementation of the never-enforced 1985 law while the federal appeal 
		proceeds.
 
 In anticipation of the law going into effect, Planned Parenthood Mar 
		Monte filed a new lawsuit in state court Monday seeking to halt its 
		implementation.
 
 The California-based abortion rights group and health care provider, and 
		a physician using the pseudonym Dr. Doe, filed a complaint for 
		injunctive relief in Clark County’s District Court on Monday. They argue 
		the 1985 law, SB510, relies on a “hazy, inadequate” process for minors 
		to secure an exception to the law that violates guarantees of procedural 
		due process and lacks guidance or rules to govern it.
 
 “It is fundamentally unclear how any patient seeking a judicial bypass 
		order may practically do so across the state of Nevada at this time,” 
		attorneys wrote in the filing.
 
		
		 
		Shortly after SB510’s passage in 1985, the U.S. District Court for the 
		District of Nevada issued an injunction, saying the law violated the 
		right to abortion under the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Court of Appeals 
		for the 9th Circuit agreed, making that injunction permanent even while 
		the law stayed on the books.
 Following the overturn of the Roe v. Wade decision, which had protected 
		the constitutional right to an abortion for about 50 years, district 
		attorneys from Lyon County and Carson City in 2024 argued the 1985 law 
		is now enforceable. They won an initial legal battle in April, but Traum 
		agreed to continue the stay pending an appeal. That appeal is still 
		pending and scheduled for oral arguments in October, but in a July 18 
		order, the 9th Circuit wrote that Planned Parenthood “failed to 
		establish serious questions going to the merits on its argument” that 
		would have justified the court issuing a temporary stay.
 
 James Bopp Jr., a conservative lawyer representing the district 
		attorneys from Carson City, Storey and Douglas counties, among others, 
		celebrated the news in a phone interview Tuesday evening, saying parents 
		are now guaranteed to be involved in the abortion process.
 
 “Planned Parenthood better be complying, starting an hour ago, with the 
		parental notice law,” Bopp said. “They’re very aware that this was in 
		the offing because all their efforts to keep this law (out of) effect 
		failed.”
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 In the state case, attorneys for 
			Planned Parenthood also argued that the law contains provisions that 
			have been “impliedly repealed” by a 2019 law repealing informed 
			consent laws for abortions and the sweeping 2022 amendment to the 
			Nevada Constitution ensuring equal rights for all “regardless of 
			race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or 
			expression, age, disability, ancestry, or national origin.”
 Attorneys noted that though most adolescents involve a parent in 
			their abortion decision-making, the law has no exemptions for minors 
			who are in foster care or are victims of sexual or physical abuse by 
			their parents or guardians. In the latter case, attorneys wrote that 
			the forced parental involvement can endanger the physical and 
			emotional well-being of minors.
 
 As written, SB510 requires physicians to notify parents or guardians 
			before performing abortions on minors. Though minors seeking an 
			abortion could also obtain court authorization to avoid the 
			notification requirement, Planned Parenthood attorneys said it’s “an 
			opaque and daunting process,” especially for minors.
 
 “Subjecting a patient to the judicial bypass process, alone, 
			additionally delays — and even, at times, denies — access to care 
			and can compound the physiological, psychological, emotional, and 
			other consequences associated with forcing an adolescent to continue 
			an unwanted pregnancy,” they wrote.
 
 Bopp described the new legal challenge from Planned Parenthood as 
			“phony objections,” saying that arguments about difficulties in 
			getting an abortion were well litigated under Roe v. Wade, and laws 
			identical to Nevada’s notification law were upheld.
 
 He added that it’s the state judicial system that regulates and 
			authorizes procedures such as the notification law, and that’s a 
			decision for that system, not Planned Parenthood.
 
 “We just don’t see any other claims having any merit,” Bopp said.
 
 A representative for Attorney General Aaron Ford’s office did not 
			immediately respond to a request for comment.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved 
			
			 |