| 
		Texas AG claimed three homes as primary residence. Democrats are being 
		probed for similar issue
		[July 24, 2025]  
		By BRIAN SLODYSKO 
		WASHINGTON (AP) — Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and his wife, 
		Angela, are longtime owners of a $1.5 million house in a gated community 
		outside Dallas. In 2015, they snapped up a second home in Austin. Then 
		another.
 The problem: Mortgages signed by the Paxtons contained inaccurate 
		statements declaring that each of those three houses was their primary 
		residence, enabling the now-estranged couple to improperly lock in low 
		interest rates, according to an Associated Press review of public 
		records. The lower rates will save the Paxtons tens of thousands of 
		dollars in payments over the life of the loan, legal experts say.
 
 The records also revealed that the Paxtons collected an impermissible 
		homestead tax break on two of those homes, and they have routinely 
		flouted lending agreements on some of their other properties.
 
 It is a federal and state crime to knowingly make false statements on 
		mortgage documents. It's also against the law in Texas to collect a 
		homestead tax break on two separate properties. Violating the terms of a 
		mortgage could allow lenders recourse to seek full payment of a loan, 
		according to legal experts.
 
 Mortgages have become political fodder
 
 The mortgage revelations are likely to become fodder in the Republican 
		primary for a U.S. Senate seat in which Paxton is seeking to topple the 
		incumbent, John Cornyn. The situation is further complicated by the 
		Trump administration's criminal pursuit of Democrats over similar 
		issues.
 
 President Donald Trump has accused two of his political foes — Sen. Adam 
		Schiff of California and New York Attorney General Letitia James — of 
		committing mortgage fraud, though legal experts say the circumstances 
		are less serious.
 
		
		 
		The Democrats have long been objects of Trump’s ire for having led 
		various investigations into his conduct as president and as a business 
		executive.
 Paxton, himself, has weighed in on the investigation of James, saying he 
		hoped authorities would look into her conduct. “I hope that if she’s 
		done something wrong, I hope that she’s actually held accountable,” he 
		told supporters last month.
 
 The Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation of James, 
		FBI director Kash Patel told Fox News in May. The department received a 
		criminal referral for Schiff last week from the Federal Housing Finance 
		Agency, its director William Pulte confirmed in a social media post.
 
 Neither the Justice Department nor the FHFA responded to an inquiry 
		about whether they may investigate Paxton, too.
 
 James’ attorney, Abbe Lowell, urged the Trump administration to 
		investigate Paxton instead.
 
 “If this administration was genuinely interested in rooting out fraud, 
		it appears they should stop wasting their time on the baseless and 
		discredited allegations against the New York Attorney General James and 
		turn their attention to Texas,” said Lowell, a prominent Washington 
		attorney whose past clients include Hunter Biden, Ivanka Trump and Jared 
		Kushner.
 
 In a statement, Marisol Samayoa, a Schiff spokeswoman, blasted the 
		criminal referral as “a transparent attempt” by Trump “to punish a 
		perceived political foe who is committed to holding him to account.” She 
		added that Schiff disclosed to his lenders that he owned another home 
		that was a principal residence and sought guidance from an attorney.
 
 It is unlikely that Paxton, a staunch Trump ally, will face the same 
		federal scrutiny as James and Schiff. It’s equally doubtful that Paxton 
		will face much legal trouble in Texas: His office is one of the primary 
		agencies tasked with investigating allegations of mortgage fraud.
 
 Ken Paxton and his spokesman did not respond to multiple requests for 
		comment. Angela Paxton, who is a state senator in Texas, did not respond 
		to requests made through her office.
 
 Three of the Paxtons' homes are each listed as a primary residence
 
 Documents reviewed by the AP show the Paxtons hold mortgages on three 
		homes — one in suburban Dallas, two in Austin — that are each listed as 
		their primary residence. The designation comes with a considerable 
		financial upside.
 
 Interest rates on primary homes are significantly lower than those for 
		mortgages on secondary homes or investment properties, saving buyers 
		tens of thousands of dollars — if not more — over the life of a loan.
 
		
		 
		Making a case against Paxton would require "establishing both that 
		Paxton was aware of the contents of the mortgage document, and also that 
		he was actively aware at the time that he signed it that this was not 
		going to be a primary residence,” said Jennifer E. Laurin, a professor 
		at the University of Texas Law School in Austin.
 Legal experts say it is possible that the Paxtons’ lenders prepared the 
		documents and that the couple did not carefully review them before 
		signing.
 
 Even if that were the case, some legal experts say that Paxton, as an 
		attorney and Texas’ top law enforcement officer, ought to have known 
		better.
 
 “If he filled out lender documents knowing that they were false, then 
		that is a false statement to obtain a mortgage on favorable terms. That 
		would be actionable,” said Arif Lawji, a veteran Texas real estate 
		attorney. “He’s the chief enforcement officer. You have to be 
		accountable for stuff you do that’s wrong.”
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton attends a roundtable discussion at 
			the Community Operations Center, Friday July 11, 2025 in Kerrville, 
			Texas, where President Trump and Gov. Abbott met with first 
			responders and local officials one week after an devastating flash 
			flood. (Ricardo B. Brazziell/Austin American-Statesman via AP) 
            
			
			
			 
            Paxton collected two 'homestead' tax breaks
 Low interest rates are not the only perk the Paxtons secured, 
			records show. In 2018, they simultaneously collected homestead 
			property tax breaks on their family’s home in suburban Dallas, as 
			well as on a $1.1 million home in Austin, property records and tax 
			statements show.
 
 A homestead tax break is a property tax reduction that a homeowner 
			is only eligible to collect on one property that is also their 
			primary home.
 
 The suburban Dallas home is where the Paxtons’ family has long 
			resided. It’s where Ken and Angela Paxton are registered to vote. It 
			is located in the state Senate district that Angela Paxton 
			represents in the Legislature, which Ken Paxton held before his 
			election in 2014 to be attorney general. It’s also where Ken 
			Paxton’s Senate campaign website until recently said he lived.
 
 Lawji said the Paxtons’ simultaneous collection of two homestead tax 
			breaks appears to be a more clearcut violation. That is because one 
			must obtain a form and submit it to taxing authorities to receive 
			such a tax break, making it an “intentional act,” he said.
 
 The tax break was worth several thousand dollars, a fact that 
			confounded real estate lawyers. “Why would you try to do all of 
			this,” Lawji said, “when you are the attorney general? That’s a 
			bigger question to me than the money, when you are AG and have to 
			enforce this law.”
 
 Paxton may have violated mortgage terms by renting properties
 
 Separately, land records indicate the Paxtons may have violated the 
			terms of at least two mortgages on other houses they own. The 
			mortgage on a home in College Station, Texas, says the property is 
			for the Paxtons’ exclusive use and cannot be rented out. Doing so 
			would be grounds for terminating the mortgage, the document states. 
			The home has been listed for rent on real estate websites on-and-off 
			since at least 2022.
 
 Ken Paxton also holds a $1.2 million mortgage on a “5 bedroom luxury 
			cabin” in Broken Bow, Oklahoma, that is for rent on Airbnb and other 
			short-term rental sites, records show. The property’s mortgage 
			stipulates that it cannot be rented out.
 
 Representatives for Stifel Bank, Cornerstone Home Lending and 
			Benchmark Mortgage, which issued the mortgages in question, did not 
			respond to requests for comment.
 
            
			 
            Schiff and James come under fire from GOP
 Paxton’s real estate dealings are in many ways distinct from those 
			of James and Schiff, the Democrats targeted by the Trump 
			administration.
 
 The investigation of James centers on forms she signed in 2023 while 
			helping a niece buy a home in Virginia. One form stated that James 
			intended to occupy the home as her “principal residence.” But in 
			other documents, the New York attorney general made clear she had no 
			intention of living there. An email to the mortgage loan broker two 
			weeks before she signed the documents stated the property “WILL NOT 
			be my primary residence.”
 
 “As I’ve said from the beginning, if prosecutors want to know that 
			truth about Attorney General James’ mortgage applications, we are 
			ready and waiting with the facts,” said Lowell, James’ attorney.
 
 For over a decade, Schiff owned homes in Maryland and California, 
			the state he represents, that were both designated as his primary 
			residence. In 2020, then a congressman, Schiff designated his 
			Maryland property as a second home — a step Paxton has not taken.
 
 Paxton has faced legal and political challenges
 
 Paxton’s real estate dealings are not the first time he has drawn 
			scrutiny for his conduct while in office.
 
 Before his election as attorney general, Paxton, then a state 
			senator, admitted in 2014 to violating Texas securities law and paid 
			a fine.
 
 He spent roughly 10 years under state indictment on securities 
			charges while serving as attorney general. The charges were 
			eventually dropped in 2024. Other alleged misdeeds in office led to 
			his impeachment by Texas’ GOP-controlled House in 2023. He was 
			acquitted in a trial by the Senate.
 
 Angela Paxton did not cast a vote in his impeachment trial and 
			recently filed for divorce, citing Ken Paxton’s infidelity and other 
			“recent discoveries.” She did not elaborate.
 
 What ultimately unleashed the impeachment push was Paxton’s 
			relationship with Austin real estate developer Nate Paul, who 
			pleaded guilty this year to one count of making a false statement to 
			a financial institution.
 
 In 2020, eight top aides in Paxton’s office told the FBI they were 
			concerned the state’s top law enforcement official was misusing his 
			office to help Paul over the developer’s unproven claims about an 
			elaborate conspiracy to steal $200 million of his properties.
 
 The House impeachment managers accused Paxton of attempting to 
			interfere in foreclosure lawsuits and issuing legal opinions to 
			benefit Paul. They also alleged that Paul employed a woman with whom 
			Paxton had an affair in exchange for legal help and that the 
			developer paid for expensive renovations to the attorney general’s 
			home in Austin.
 
 That would be the same house that he declared in mortgage documents 
			was his third primary residence.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |