| 
		Trump administration appeals to Supreme Court to allow $783 million 
		research-funding cuts
		[July 25, 2025] 
		By LINDSAY WHITEHURST 
		WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on 
		Thursday to allow it to cut hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of 
		research funding in its push to roll back federal diversity, equity and 
		inclusion efforts.
 The Justice Department argued a federal judge in Massachusetts was wrong 
		to block the National Institutes of Health from making $783 million 
		worth of cuts to align with President Donald Trump’s priorities.
 
 U.S. District Judge William Young found that the abrupt cancellations 
		ignored long-held government rules and standards.
 
 Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, also said the 
		cuts amounted to “racial discrimination and discrimination against 
		America’s LGBTQ community.”
 
 “I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this,” Young said 
		at a hearing last month. An appeals court left the ruling in place.
 
 The ruling came in lawsuits filed by 16 attorneys general, public-health 
		advocacy groups and some affected scientists. His decision addressed 
		only a fraction of the hundreds of NIH research projects that have been 
		cut.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 The Trump administration’s appeal 
			also takes aim at nearly two dozen cases over funding.
 Solicitor General D. John Sauer pointed to a 5-4 decision on the 
			Supreme Court’s emergency docket from April that allowed cuts to 
			teacher training programs to go forward, one of multiple recent 
			victories for the president at the nation's highest court. The order 
			shows that district judges shouldn’t be hearing those cases at all, 
			but rather sending them to federal claims court, he argued.
 
 “Those decisions reflect quintessential policy judgments on hotly 
			contested issues that should not be subject to judicial 
			second-guessing. It is hardly irrational for agencies to 
			recognize—as members of this Court have done—that paeans to 
			'diversity' often conceal invidious racial discrimination,” he 
			wrote.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |