| 
				The bulk of the spending being clawed back is for foreign 
				assistance programs. About $1.1 billion was destined for the 
				Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which finances NPR and PBS, 
				though most of that money is distributed to more than 1,500 
				local public radio and television stations around the country.
 The White House had billed the legislation as a test case for 
				Congress and said more such rescission packages would be on the 
				way.
 
 Some Republicans were uncomfortable with the cuts, yet supported 
				them anyway, wary of crossing Trump or upsetting his agenda. 
				Democrats unanimously rejected the cuts but were powerless to 
				stop them.
 
 The White House says the public media system is politically 
				biased and an unnecessary expense. Conservatives particularly 
				directed their ire at NPR and PBS. Lawmakers with large rural 
				constituencies voiced grave concern about what the cuts to 
				public broadcasting could mean for some local public stations in 
				their state. Some stations will have to close, they warned.
 
 Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said the stations are “not just 
				your news — it is your tsunami alert, it is your landslide 
				alert, it is your volcano alert.”
 
 On the foreign aid cuts, the White House argued that they would 
				incentivize other nations to step up and do more to respond to 
				humanitarian crises and that the rescissions best served the 
				American taxpayer.
 
 Democrats argued that the Republican administration’s animus 
				toward foreign aid programs would hurt America’s standing in the 
				world and create a vacuum for China to fill. They also expressed 
				concerns that the cuts would have deadly consequences for many 
				of the world’s most impoverished people.
 
 “With these cuts, we will cause death, spread disease and deepen 
				starvation across the planet,” said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii.
 
 All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights 
				reserved
 |  |