| 
		Federal Reserve likely to air divisions as it keeps rates unchanged
		[July 30, 2025]  By 
		CHRISTOPHER RUGABER 
		WASHINGTON (AP) — Two top Federal Reserve officials could dissent from 
		the central bank’s likely decision Wednesday to hold its key interest 
		rate steady, a sign of division at the Fed that reflects the economy's 
		muddy outlook and possibly the jockeying to replace Chair Jerome Powell 
		when his term ends in May 2026.
 Based on their public comments in the past two months, it's possible 
		that governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman could vote against 
		leaving the short-term rate at about 4.3%. If so, it would be the first 
		time two governors have dissented in over three decades.
 
 The division could be a preview of what might happen after Powell steps 
		down, if President Donald Trump appoints a replacement who pushes for 
		the much lower interest rates the White House desires. Other Fed 
		officials could push back if a future chair sought to cut rates by more 
		than economic conditions would otherwise support.
 
 For now, any dissent also would likely reflect that there are at least 
		two different ways to see the U.S. economy, which is clearly in flux. 
		The first is the way that most Fed officials have described it: 
		Unemployment is at a low 4.1%, while the economy is growing, albeit 
		modestly, and inflation did tick up in June, largely because of tariffs.
 
		
		 
		So, the thinking goes, why not stand pat on rates and see what happens 
		next? If inflation continues to worsen, a rate cut could make things 
		worse — the Fed typically raises borrowing costs to combat inflation. 
		And as long as the economy is doing well, there is no need to cut to 
		support growth.
 The other view is more worrisome: There are signs the economy is 
		weakening, such as sluggish hiring, slower consumer spending, and pretty 
		modest overall growth. The economy, in the first six months of the year, 
		probably expanded at an annual rate of about 1.5%. At the same time, 
		tariffs have lifted inflation by less than many economists expected, so 
		far.
 
 This is the view of the economy that Waller sketched out in a speech 
		earlier this month.
 
 “Private-sector payroll growth is near stall speed,” Waller said. “We 
		should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the 
		policy rate.”
 
 When the Fed cuts its rate, it often — but not always — leads to lower 
		borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans and credit cards.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
  Some economists agree with Waller's 
			concerns about the job market. Excluding government hiring, the 
			economy added just 74,000 jobs in June, with most of those gains 
			occurring in health care.
 “We are in a much slower job hiring backdrop than most people 
			appreciate,” said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at PGIM Fixed 
			Income.
 
 Waller was appointed to the Fed's seven-member governing board by 
			Trump during the president's first term. He has often been mentioned 
			as a potential replacement for Powell. Waller has underscored in 
			several speeches that he does not think Trump's tariffs will lead to 
			persistently higher inflation.
 
 Bowman, the vice chair for regulation, was also appointed during 
			Trump's first term. She suggested in June that the Fed should soon 
			reduce borrowing costs. Bowman is also a possible Powell 
			replacement, though more of a long shot.
 
 Michael Feroli, an economist at JPMorgan Chase, said in a note to 
			clients this week if the pair were to dissent, “it would say more 
			about auditioning for the Fed chair appointment than about economic 
			conditions.”
 
 The Fed's two-day meeting comes after a week of extraordinary 
			interactions with the Trump White House, which has accused Powell of 
			mismanaging an extensive, $2.5 billion renovation of two office 
			buildings. Trump suggested two weeks ago that the rising cost for 
			the project could be a “firing offense” but has since backed off 
			that characterization.
 
 Notably, Trump argues that the Fed should cut because the economy is 
			doing very well, which is a different viewpoint than nearly all 
			economists, who say that a healthy, growing economy doesn't need 
			rate cuts.
 
 “If your economy is hot, you're supposed to have higher short-term 
			rates,” Porcelli said.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 
			 |