Judge denies Harvey Weinstein’s bid for mistrial after juror complains
[June 07, 2025]
By PHILIP MARCELO
NEW YORK (AP) — A juror in Harvey Weinstein’s sex crimes trial asked to
be removed from the case Friday because he felt his fellow jurors were
treating a member of their panel in an “unfair and unjust” way, but the
judge told him he had to keep deliberating.
Judge Curtis Farber later denied a defense request for a mistrial,
saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the
deliberation process, noting that he’s the youngest on the 12-person
panel.
“This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated
deliberations,” Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his
peers. “Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict.”
The second day of deliberations ended Friday without a verdict. Jurors
are expected back in court Monday.
Jurors reheard testimony from Weinstein’s three accusers. They also
reviewed other evidence, including medical records and emails.
Twice on Friday, though, a juror requested to address the court without
the other jurors present.
The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was
uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror.
But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate
jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant
being dismissed.
The juror insisted, calling the treatment “unfair and unjust” even as he
described the tension as “playground stuff” with jurors shunning another
juror and talking behind their back.
[to top of second column]
|
 Weinstein’s lawyer Arthur Aidala
argued that the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the
court found out more about the concerns.
He criticized the judge’s questions to the
concerned juror as “anemic at best.”
“You didn’t ask him one follow-up question,” Aidala said.
Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted
appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them —
including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all
members of the jury are deliberating.
The issue, she noted, does not appear to be hindering the jury’s
work, as the panel requested a readout of other testimony even after
he raised concerns.
Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo
movement in 2017.
The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of
criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old
Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the
higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty.
Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California,
but the New York conviction was overturned last year, leading to the
retrial before a new jury and a different judge.
Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy
testimony from three accusers.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |
