Brazil’s Supreme Court justices agree to make social media companies 
		liable for user content
		
		[June 12, 2025]  By 
		MAURICIO SAVARESE and ELÉONORE HUGHES 
						
		BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — The majority of justices on Brazil’s Supreme 
		Court have agreed to make social media companies liable for illegal 
		postings by their users, in a landmark case for Latin America with 
		implications for U.S. relations. 
		 
		Brazil's top court decided to rule on two different cases to reach an 
		understanding on how to deal with social media companies as reports of 
		fraud, child pornography and violence among teenagers become rampant 
		online. Critics warn such measures could threaten free speech as 
		platforms preemptively remove content that could be problematic. 
		 
		Gilmar Mendes on Wednesday became the sixth of the court’s 11 justices 
		to vote to open a path for companies like Meta, X and Microsoft to be 
		sued and pay fines for content published by their users. Voting is 
		ongoing but a simple majority is all that is needed for the measure to 
		pass. 
		 
		The ruling will come after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of 
		possible visa restrictions against foreign officials allegedly involved 
		in censoring American citizens. One such official reportedly is 
		Brazilian Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who has taken measures against 
		social media outlets he deemed to have not complied with Brazilian law. 
		 
		The only dissenting Brazilian justice so far is André Mendonça and his 
		vote was made public last week. The court is yet to decide how such 
		regulations will be enacted. 
		 
		Mendonça said free speech on social media is key for the publication of 
		information that "holds powerful public institutions to account, 
		including governments, political elites and digital platforms.” 
						
		
		  
						
		Justice Flávio Dino, the first to vote on Wednesday, reminded his 
		colleagues that recent cases of school shootings in Brazil were 
		stimulated on social media. He read out postings by one user who said he 
		was happy by watching families of dead children “weeping, bleeding, 
		dying.” 
		 
		“I think social media has not made humanity closer to what it has 
		produced in best fashion,” he said. 
		 
		The social media proposal would become law once voting is finished and 
		the result is published. But Brazil’s Congress could still pass another 
		law to reverse the measure. 
		 
		
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
            Minister Luiz Fux, left, Google Brazil’s rapporteur, talks with 
			Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberto Barroso, during the court’s 
			resumption of social media regulation cases regarding online 
			disinformation, in Brasilia, Brazil, Wednesday, June 4, 2025. (AP 
			Photo/Eraldo Peres) 
            
			
			
			  The current legislation states 
			social media companies can only be held responsible if they do not 
			remove hazardous content after a court order. 
			 
			Public debate on regulating social networks increased in Brazil in 
			the aftermath of the Jan. 8 riot in 2023, when supporters of former 
			president Jair Bolsonaro ransacked Congress, the presidential palace 
			and the Supreme Court in the capital, Brasilia. 
			 
			Platforms need to be pro-active in regulating content, said Alvaro 
			Palma de Jorge, a law professor at the Rio-based Getulio Vargas 
			Foundation, a think tank and university. 
			 
			“They need to adopt certain precautions that are not compatible with 
			simply waiting for a judge to eventually issue a decision ordering 
			the removal of that content,” Palma de Jorge said. 
			 
			Wednesday’s ruling brings Brazil’s approach to big tech closer to 
			the European Union’s approach, which has sought to rein in the power 
			of social media companies and other digital platforms. 
			 
			Rendering platforms automatically accountable for content on their 
			platforms may infringe freedom of speech as they could resort to 
			preemptively removing content, according to the Sao-Paulo based 
			Brazilian Chamber of Digital Economy, an organization that 
			represents sectors of the digital economy. 
			 
			“This type of liability favors large companies with robust legal 
			structures, to the detriment of smaller, national players, which 
			negatively impacts competition,” said the organization, adding that 
			the decision may increase barriers to innovation. 
			 
			___ 
			 
			Hughes reported from Rio de Janeiro. 
			
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved  |