UK lawmakers to vote on allowing terminally ill adults to end their
lives
[June 20, 2025]
By PAN PYLAS
LONDON (AP) — British lawmakers are set to vote Friday on whether to
back a bill to help terminally ill adults end their lives in England and
Wales, in what could be one of the most consequential social policy
decisions they will ever make.
Members of Parliament supported legalizing assisted dying when they
first debated the issue in November by 330 votes to 275.
Since then, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has undergone
months of scrutiny leading to some changes in the proposed legislation,
which is being shepherded through Parliament by Labour lawmaker Kim
Leadbeater rather than the government.
Leadbeater is confident lawmakers will back the bill.
“We have the most robust piece of legislation in the world in front of
us tomorrow, and I know that many colleagues have engaged very closely
with the legislation and will make their decision based on those facts
and that evidence, and that cannot be disputed," Leadbeater said
Thursday on the eve of the vote alongside bereaved and terminally ill
people.
Proponents of the bill argue those with a terminal diagnosis must be
given a choice at the end of their lives. However, opponents say the
disabled and elderly could be at risk of being coerced, directly or
indirectly, to end their lives to save money or relieve the burden on
family members. Others have called for the improvement of palliative
care to ease suffering as an alternative.
The vote is potentially the biggest change to social policy since
abortion was legalized in 1967.

What lawmakers are voting on
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow terminally ill
adults aged over 18 in England and Wales, who are deemed to have less
than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death.
The terminally ill person would have to be capable of taking the fatal
drugs themselves.
Proponents of the bill say wealthy individuals can travel to
Switzerland, which allows foreigners to legally end their lives, while
others have to face possible prosecution for helping their loves ones
die.
How the vote may go
The outcome of the vote is unclear, as some lawmakers who backed the
bill in the fall only did so on the proviso there would be changes made.
Some who backed the bill then have voiced disappointment at the changes,
while others have indicated Parliament has not been given enough time to
debate the issues.
The vote is a free one, meaning lawmakers vote according to their
conscience rather than on party lines. Alliances have formed across the
political divide.
If 28 members switched directly from backing the bill to opposing it,
while others voted exactly the same way, the legislation would fail.
Timeline if the bill passes
Friday's vote is not the end of the matter. The legislation would then
go to the unelected House of Lords, which has the power to delay and
amend policy, though it can't overrule the lower chamber.

[to top of second column]
|

Demonstrators against assisted dying hold banners outside Parliament
in London, Friday, June 20, 2025, as British lawmakers are set to
vote Friday on whether to back a bill to help terminally ill adults
end their lives in England and Wales. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

Since assisted dying was not in the governing Labour Party's election
manifesto last year, the House of Lords has more room to maneuver. Any
amendments would then go back to the House of Commons.
If the bill is passed, backers say implementation will take four years,
rather than the initially suggested two. That means it could become law
in 2029, around the time the next general election must be held.
Changes to the bill
Plenty of revisions have been made to the measure, but not enough for
some.
Perhaps the most important change was to drop the requirement that a
judge sign off on any decision. Many in the legal profession had
objected.
Now any request would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel
featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
Changes also were made to ensure the establishment of independent
advocates to support people with learning disabilities, autism or mental
health conditions and the creation of a disability advisory board.
No involvement of health care practitioners
It was already the case that doctors would not be required to take part,
but lawmakers have since voted to insert a new clause into the bill
extending the provision to anyone.
The wording means “no person,” including social care workers and
pharmacists, is obliged to take part in assisted dying and can therefore
opt out.
The government's stance
There is clear no consensus in the cabinet about the measure.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has indicated he will back the bill on
Friday. His health secretary, Wes Streeting, is opposed but said he will
respect the outcome.

There are also questions about how it would impact the U.K.’s
state-funded National Health Service, hospice care and the legal system.
Nations where assisted dying is legal
Other countries that have legalized assisted suicide include Australia,
Belgium, Canada and parts of the United States, with regulations on who
is eligible varying by jurisdiction.
Assisted suicide is different from euthanasia, allowed in the
Netherlands and Canada, which involves health care practitioners
administering a lethal injection at the patient's request in specific
circumstances.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |