|
The law, one of the toughest in the nation, requires people to
undergo a criminal background check and complete a gun safety
training course in order to obtain a permit to buy a firearm. It
also bans high-capacity magazines holding more than 10 rounds.
Measure 114 has been tied up in state and federal court since it
was narrowly approved by voters in November 2022. It was among
the first gun restrictions to be passed after a major 2022 U.S.
Supreme Court ruling changed the guidance judges are expected to
follow when considering Second Amendment cases.
A state judge in rural southeastern Oregon temporarily blocked
the law from taking effect after gun owners filed a lawsuit
claiming it violated the right to bear arms under the Oregon
Constitution. Circuit Court Judge Robert S. Raschio then
presided over a 2023 trial in Harney County and ruled that the
law violated the state constitution. The Oregon attorney
general's office appealed the ruling.
In their Wednesday opinion, a three-judge panel of the Oregon
Court of Appeals found that the law’s permit-to-purchase program
and high-capacity magazine ban do not “unduly frustrate” the
right to armed self-defense under the state constitution.
The attorney general’s office said the law won’t go into effect
immediately, as those challenging the law have 35 days to seek
further appellate review.
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield welcomed the ruling.
“Oregonians voted for this, and it’s time we move ahead with
common-sense safety measures,” he said in a statement.
Tony Aiello Jr., the lead counsel representing the gun owners in
the case, said he intends to appeal the ruling to the Oregon
Supreme Court. In a statement Wednesday, he said Measure 114
“has turned millions of Oregonians into criminals because their
right to bear arms has been erased by Oregon’s Judiciary.”
In a separate federal case over the measure, a judge ruled it
was lawful under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The plaintiffs in that federal case, which include the Oregon
Firearms Federation, appealed the ruling to the 9th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights
reserved |
|
