| 
		The Atlantic releases the Signal chat showing Hegseth's detailed attack 
		plans against the Houthis
		[March 27, 2025]  
		By TARA COPP 
		WASHINGTON (AP) — The Atlantic on Wednesday released the entire Signal 
		chat among senior national security officials, showing that Defense 
		Secretary Pete Hegseth provided the exact timings of warplane launches 
		and when bombs would drop — before the men and women flying those 
		attacks against Yemen’s Houthis this month on behalf of the United 
		States were airborne.
 The disclosure follows two intense days during which leaders of 
		President Donald Trump's intelligence and defense agencies have 
		struggled to explain how details — that current and former U.S. 
		officials have said would have been classified — wound up on an 
		unclassified Signal chat that included Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey 
		Goldberg,
 
 White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said no classified 
		information was posted to the Signal chat.
 
 Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., chairman of the Senate Armed Services 
		Committee, said he and Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the committee’s top 
		Democrat, plan to send a letter to the Trump administration requesting 
		an inspector general investigation into the use of Signal. They seek a 
		classified briefing with a top administration official “who can speak to 
		the facts” of the episode.
 
 Top military official was not included in the chat
 
 The chat was also notable for who it excluded: the only military 
		attendee of the principals committee, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs 
		of Staff.
 
 Adm. Christopher Grady is currently serving in that position in an 
		acting capacity because Trump fired former chairman Gen. CQ Brown Jr. in 
		February.
 
		
		 
		National security adviser Mike Waltz was authorized to decide whether to 
		include the Joint Chiefs chairman in the principals committee 
		discussion, “based on the policy relevance of attendees to the issues 
		being considered, the need for secrecy on sensitive matters, staffing 
		needs, and other considerations,” the White House said in a Jan. 20 
		memo.
 The Pentagon said it would not comment on the issue, and it was not 
		immediately clear why Grady, currently serving as the president’s top 
		military adviser, would not be included in a discussion on military 
		strikes.
 
 Hegseth has refused to say whether he posted classified information onto 
		Signal. He is traveling in the Indo-Pacific and to date has only scoffed 
		at questions, saying he did not reveal “war plans.” Director of National 
		Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe told members 
		of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday that it was up to 
		Hegseth to determine whether the information he was posting was 
		classified or not.
 
 Very specific texts were revealed
 
 What was revealed was jaw-dropping in its specificity and includes the 
		type of information that is kept to a very close hold to protect the 
		operational security of a military strike. But Hegseth’s spokesman, Sean 
		Parnell, said in a statement Wednesday that “there were no classified 
		materials or war plans shared. The Secretary was merely updating the 
		group on a plan that was underway.”
 
 The Pentagon and White House have tried to deflect criticism by 
		attacking Goldberg and The Atlantic. The magazine and Goldberg, however, 
		repeatedly reached out to the White House before and after publication 
		to gain additional context on the Signal chat and ensure that publishing 
		the full texts would not cause harm. In a response, Goldberg reported 
		Wednesday, Leavitt described some of the information as sensitive and 
		said the White House would prefer it not be published.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            F/A-18F Super Hornet fighter jet takes off from the aircraft carrier 
			U.S.S. Dwight D. Eisenhower, also known as the 'IKE', in the south 
			Red Sea, Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2024. (AP Photo/Bernat Armangue, File) 
            
			
			 
            In the group chat, Hegseth posted multiple details about the 
			impending strike, using military language and laying out when a 
			“strike window” starts, where a “target terrorist" was located, the 
			time elements around the attack and when various weapons and 
			aircraft would be used in the strike. He mentioned that the U.S. was 
			“currently clean” on operational security."
 “Godspeed to our Warriors,” he wrote.
 
 “1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)”
 
 “1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target 
			Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, 
			Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)”
 
 “1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)”
 
 “1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL 
			DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets)”
 
 “1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks 
			launched.”
 
 “MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)”
 
 “We are currently clean on OPSEC” — that is, operational security.
 
 A strike package includes the personnel and weapons used in an 
			attack, including Navy F-18 fighter aircraft. MQ-9s are armed 
			drones. Tomahawks are ship-launched cruise missiles.
 
 Goldberg has said he asked the White House if it opposed publication 
			and that the White House responded that it would prefer he did not 
			publish.
 
 Signal is encrypted but can be vulnerable
 
 Signal is a publicly available app that provides encrypted 
			communications, but it can be hacked. It is not approved for 
			carrying classified information. On March 14, one day before the 
			strikes, the Defense Department cautioned personnel about the 
			vulnerability of Signal, specifically that Russia was attempting to 
			hack the app, according to a U.S. official who was not authorized to 
			discuss the matter publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
 
 One known vulnerability is that a malicious actor, with access to a 
			person’s phone, can link his or her device to the user’s Signal and 
			essentially monitor messages remotely in real time.
 
            
			 
			Leavitt is one of three Trump administration officials who face a 
			lawsuit from The Associated Press on First and Fifth Amendment 
			grounds. The AP says the three are punishing the news agency for 
			editorial decisions they oppose. The White House says the AP is not 
			following an executive order to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the 
			Gulf of America.
 —-
 
 Associated Press writer Stephen Groves contributed to this report.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |