| 
		Judge says Justice Department attacked her character to 'impugn the 
		integrity' of US judicial system
		[March 27, 2025]  
		By ALANNA DURKIN RICHER 
		WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge accused the Justice Department on 
		Wednesday of attacking her character in an effort to undermine the 
		integrity of the judicial system, forcefully pushing back against the 
		Trump administration's criticism of the courts for rulings that blocked 
		parts of the president's agenda.
 U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell’s comments came in an order denying the 
		Justice Department’s bid to remove her from a case over an executive 
		order punishing a prominent law firm. The Trump administration had asked 
		for the case to be moved to another judge in Washington’s federal court, 
		accusing Howell of demonstrating “a pattern of hostility” toward the 
		Republican president.
 
 "When the U.S. Department of Justice engages in this rhetorical strategy 
		of ad hominem attack, the stakes become much larger than only the 
		reputation of the targeted federal judge," wrote Howell, who was 
		appointed to the federal bench by Democratic President Barack Obama.
 
 “This strategy is designed to impugn the integrity of the federal 
		judicial system and blame any loss on the decision-maker rather than 
		fallacies in the substantive legal arguments presented.”
 
 It's the latest development in the Trump administration's battle with 
		the judiciary over legal setbacks to his sweeping executive actions 
		around immigration and other matters. The Trump administration has 
		ramped up its criticism of judges in recent weeks, accusing the 
		judiciary of improperly impinging on the president's powers. Trump has 
		called for impeaching another Washington federal court judge who ruled 
		against the president's deportation plans.
 
		
		 
		Howell said the Trump administration's claims of “ongoing improper 
		encroachments" of Trump's executive power sounds “like a talking point 
		from a member of Congress rather than a legal brief from the United 
		States Department of Justice." Furthermore, it “reflects a grave 
		misapprehension of our constitutional order," she wrote.
 “Adjudicating whether an Executive Branch exercise of power is legal, or 
		not, is actually the job of the federal courts, and not of the President 
		or the Department of Justice, though vigorous and rigorous defense of 
		executive actions is both expected and helpful to the courts in 
		resolving legal issues,” she wrote.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            President Donald Trump arrives with Attorney General Pam Bondi to 
			speak at the Justice Department in Washington, Friday, March 14, 
			2025. (Pool via AP) 
            
			
			
			 
            Howell was the chief judge of Washington’s federal court during 
			special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, and in that 
			capacity, ruled that the House of Representatives was entitled to 
			secret grand jury testimony for its its own inquiry into Trump.
 The Trump administration also cited Howell’s comments calling 
			Trump’s characterization of the Jan. 6 criminal cases a “revisionist 
			myth.” And it pointed to a ruling from Howell ordering a Trump 
			lawyer to answer additional questions before a grand jury 
			investigating Trump’s handling of classified documents found at his 
			Mar-a-Lago estate.
 
 The Justice Department had argued that “reasonable observers” may 
			view Howell as unable to impartially rule on "the meritless 
			challenges to President Trump’s efforts to implement the agenda that 
			the American people elected him to carry out.”
 
 “This Court has not kept its disdain for President Trump secret,” 
			Justice Department lawyers wrote. “It has voiced its thoughts loudly 
			— both inside and outside the courtroom.”
 
 Howell said the administration's bid to get a new judge “relies only 
			on speculation, innuendo, and basic legal disagreements that provide 
			no basis for disqualification.”
 
 Howell earlier this month temporarily blocked the Trump 
			administration from enforcing portions of the executive order 
			targeting the law firm Perkins Coie. The punishment arises from the 
			firm's hiring of Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to 
			conduct opposition research on then-candidate Trump’s potential ties 
			to Russia.
 
 ___
 
 Associated Press writer Eric Tucker in Washington contributed to 
			this report.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |