| 
		Another federal judge blocks Trump policy banning transgender troops in 
		the military
		[March 28, 2025]  
		By GENE JOHNSON 
		TACOMA, Wash. (AP) — A U.S. judge in Washington state has blocked 
		enforcement of President Donald Trump’s order banning transgender people 
		from serving in the military, the second nationwide injunction against 
		the policy in as many weeks.
 The order Thursday from U.S. District Court Judge Benjamin Settle in 
		Tacoma came in a case brought by several long-serving transgender 
		military members who say the ban is insulting and discriminatory, and 
		that their firing would cause lasting damage to their careers and 
		reputations.
 
 In his 65-page ruling, Settle — an appointee of former President George 
		W. Bush and a former captain in the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General 
		Corps — said the administration offered no explanation as to why 
		transgender troops, who have been able to serve openly over the past 
		four years with no evidence of problems, should suddenly be banned.
 
 “The government’s arguments are not persuasive, and it is not an 
		especially close question on this record,” Settle wrote. “The 
		government’s unrelenting reliance on deference to military judgment is 
		unjustified in the absence of any evidence supporting ‘the military’s’ 
		new judgment reflected in the Military Ban.”
 
 U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington, D.C., similarly issued an 
		order blocking the policy last week but then put her own ruling 
		temporarily on hold pending the government's appeal. The U.S. Circuit 
		Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia late Thursday told the 
		parties that it would consider putting the ruling into effect if “any 
		action occurs that negatively impacts" transgender service members.
 
 In a more limited ruling on Monday, a judge in New Jersey barred the Air 
		Force from removing two transgender men, saying they showed their 
		separation would cause lasting damage to their careers and reputations 
		that no monetary settlement could repair.
 
		 
		Trump signed an executive order Jan. 27 that claims the sexual identity 
		of transgender service members “conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to 
		an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one’s 
		personal life” and is harmful to military readiness.
 In response, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a policy that 
		presumptively disqualifies transgender people from military service.
 
 “They can do the right number of pullups. They can do the right amount 
		of pushups. They can shoot straight,” Sasha Buchert, an attorney with 
		the civil rights law firm Lambda Legal, said after arguments Monday in 
		Tacoma. “Yet, they’re being told they have to leave the military simply 
		because of who they are.”
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Sierra Moran, a transgender service member, 
			listens during a press conference in Tacoma, Wash., on Tuesday, 
			March 25, 2025. (AP Photo/Manuel Valdes) 
            
			
			
			 
            Those challenging the policy and Trump’s executive order in Tacoma 
			include Gender Justice League, which counts transgender troops among 
			its members, and several transgender members of the military. Among 
			them is U.S. Navy Cmdr. Emily “Hawking” Shilling, a 42-year-old 
			woman who has served for more than 19 years, including 60 missions 
			as a combat aviator in Iraq and Afghanistan.
 In his ruling, Settle highlighted her case.
 
 “There is no claim and no evidence that she is now, or ever was, a 
			detriment to her unit’s cohesion, or to the military’s lethality or 
			readiness, or that she is mentally or physically unable to continue 
			her service,” he wrote. “There is no claim and no evidence that 
			Shilling herself is dishonest or selfish, or that she lacks humility 
			or integrity. Yet absent an injunction, she will be promptly 
			discharged solely because she is transgender.”
 
 During arguments Monday, Justice Department lawyer Jason Lynch 
			insisted that the president was entitled to deference in military 
			affairs and suggested the service ban was not as broad as the 
			plaintiffs had suggested.
 
 The judge peppered Lynch with questions, noting that the government 
			had offered no evidence that allowing transgender troops to serve 
			openly had caused any problems for military readiness.
 
 Thousands of transgender people serve in the military, but they 
			represent less than 1% of the total number of active-duty service 
			members.
 
 In 2016, a Defense Department policy permitted transgender people to 
			serve openly in the military. During Trump’s first term in the White 
			House, the Republican issued a directive to ban transgender service 
			members, with an exception for some of those who had already started 
			transitioning under more lenient rules that were in effect during 
			the Obama administration. The Supreme Court allowed that ban to take 
			effect. President Joe Biden, a Democrat, scrapped it when he took 
			office.
 
 The rules imposed by Hegseth include no such exceptions.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |