Budget cuts at Trump EPA become flashpoint at a heated hearing — and,
Democrats say, may kill people
[May 22, 2025]
By MATTHEW DALY
WASHINGTON (AP) — The head of the Environmental Protection Agency
clashed with Democratic senators Wednesday, accusing one of being an
“aspiring fiction writer” and saying another does not "care about
wasting money.'' Democrats countered that EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s
tenure will likely mean more Americans contracting lung cancer and other
illnesses.
The heated exchanges, at a Senate hearing to discuss President Donald
Trump's proposal to slash the agency's budget in half, showed the sharp
partisan differences over Zeldin's deregulatory approach. Zeldin, a
former Republican congressman, has said his tenure will turbocharge the
American economy while ensuring clean air and water. Democrats say he is
endangering the lives of millions of Americans and abandoning the
agency’s dual mission to protect the environment and human health.
Zeldin, who took office in January, has proposed a flood of changes that
would sharply reduce the agency's workforce, terminate billions of
dollars in grants approved by the Biden administration and roll back
dozens of environmental rules including landmark regulations on climate
change and pollution from coal-fired power plants.

Sharp words, back and forth
Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., told Zeldin that a plan to cut EPA spending
by 55% means that, to Zeldin and Trump, “more than half of the
environmental efforts of the EPA ... to make sure Americans have clean
air and clean water are just a waste.” If approved by Congress, the
budget cuts “will mean there’s more diesel and more other particulate
matter in the air" and that “water that Americans drink is going to have
more chemicals,” Schiff said.
“Your legacy will be more lung cancer," he told Zeldin. "It’ll be more
bladder cancer. It’ll be more leukemia and pancreatic cancer ... more
rare cancers of innumerable varieties.''
Replied Zeldin: “I understand that you are an aspiring fiction writer. I
see why.”
Schiff said the real fiction was Zeldin's apparent belief that he can
cut the EPA's budget in half “and it won't affect people's health, or
their water or their air." Schiff said the Republican administrator was
“totally beholden to the oil industry,” adding: "You could give a rat's
ass about how much cancer your agency causes."
Zeldin engaged in a similar rhetorical match with Rhode Island Sen.
Sheldon Whitehouse, the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and
Public Works Committee.
[to top of second column]
|

Whitehouse said Zeldin and others at EPA have made “baseless
accusations of fraud” about grants awarded under Democratic
President Joe Biden, removed “career officials who stood up for the
rule of law” and deployed FBI agents "to harass career civil
servants.''
Questions over whether Zeldin reviewed canceled grants
Whitehouse also challenged Zeldin's contention that he had
personally reviewed 781 Biden-era grants totaling nearly $2 billion
that the Trump administration later canceled. The grants were
intended to address chronic pollution in minority communities and
jump-start clean energy programs across the country, but Zeldin said
they were plagued by conflicts of interest and unqualified
recipients.
“You don't care about wasting money, but the Trump administration
does, Senator," Zeldin said.
When Whitehouse pressed to see Zeldin's schedule to prove he
personally reviewed the grants before canceling them, Zeldin said
he's worked on the issue “almost every single day” since taking
office.
"We are cracking down on every waste, every aspect of abuse,''
Zeldin said, adding that Whitehouse seemed unable to grasp that more
than one person could review EPA's grant program.
"I am insisting on the facts,'' Whitehouse said.
American taxpayers “put President Trump in office because of people
like you,” Zeldin replied. “They have Republicans in charge of the
House and Senate because of people like you. You don't want me to go
through the list of all the evidence of waste and abuse."
Whitehouse replied that Zeldin should explain why Justice Department
lawyers, speaking under oath on behalf of the agency, have “said
that everything you just said is not true. That's what I want.”
A lawyer for the EPA told a federal appeals court this week that the
agency was “not accusing anybody of fraud” in a separate dispute
over its termination of $20 billion in grants under a so-called
green bank program to finance clean energy and climate-friendly
projects nationwide.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 |