| 
		Work requirements could transform Medicaid and food aid under US budget 
		bill
		[May 23, 2025] 
		By GEOFF MULVIHILL and DAVID A. LIEB 
		The U.S. social safety net would be jolted if the budget bill backed by 
		President Donald Trump and passed Thursday by the House of 
		Representatives becomes law.
 It would impose work requirements for low-income adults to receive 
		Medicaid health insurance and increase them for food assistance as well 
		as cut funding for services like birth control to the nation’s biggest 
		abortion provider.
 
 Supporters of the bill say the moves will save money, root out waste and 
		encourage personal responsibility.
 
 A preliminary estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office 
		said the proposals would reduce the number of people with health care by 
		8.6 million over a decade.
 
 The measure, which also includes tax cuts, passed the House by one vote 
		and could have provisions reworked again as it heads to the Senate.
 
 Here's a look at the potential impact.
 
 Work would be required for most people to get Medicaid health 
		insurance
 
 Starting next year, many able-bodied Medicaid enrollees under 65 would 
		be required to show that they work, volunteer or go to school in 
		exchange for the health insurance coverage.
 
 Some people who receive Medicaid were worried Thursday that they could 
		see their coverage end, even if it is not immediately clear whether they 
		might be covered by an exception.
 
 Raquel Vasquez, a former cook who is battling two types of cancer and 
		has diabetes, said she believes she could be affected because she has 
		not been able to qualify for Social Security disability benefits. “I 
		cannot even afford this life now because of my disabilities," said the 
		41-year-old Bakersfield, California, resident. "But my country won’t 
		even help me.”
 
		
		 
		About 92% of people enrolled in Medicaid are already working, caregiving, 
		attending school or disabled. That leaves about 8% of 71 million adult 
		enrollees who would need to meet the new requirement. An estimated 5 
		million people are likely to lose coverage altogether, according to 
		previous estimates of the bill from the Congressional Budget Office.
 Only Arkansas has had a work requirement that kicks people off for 
		noncompliance. More than 18,000 lost coverage after it kicked in 2018, 
		and the program was later blocked by federal courts.
 
 “The people of Arkansas are generous and we want to help those who 
		cannot help themselves, but we have no interest in helping those who are 
		unwilling to help themselves,” said Arkansas Senate President Pro 
		Tempore Bart Hester, a Republican. “I’m glad the federal government is 
		starting to align with our thinking.”
 
 Work requirement could hit harder in rural areas
 
 Increased eligibility checks and red tape related to work requirements 
		may result in some people wrongly getting booted off, said Eduardo 
		Conrado, the president of Ascension, a health care system that operates 
		hospitals across 10 states.
 
 That could spell trouble for rural hospitals, in particular, who will 
		see their small pool of patients go from paying for their emergency care 
		with Medicaid coverage to not paying anything at all. Hospitals could 
		have to eat their costs.
 
 “Adding work requirements is not just a policy change, it’s a shift away 
		from the purpose of the program,” Conrado said of the rule.
 
 That is also a concern for Sandy Heller, of Marion, Massachusetts.
 
 Her 37-year-old son, Craig, has Down syndrome and other complicated 
		medical needs.
 
 She worries the changes would make it harder for hospitals in 
		out-of-the-way places like hers to stay afloat and offer the services he 
		could need.
 
 If they don’t, he would have to travel about 90 minutes for care.
 
 “It could mean life and death for my son if he needed that medical 
		care,” Heller said.
 
		
		 
		More people would be required to have jobs to receive food assistance
 The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food 
		stamps, already requires work for some of its roughly 42 million 
		recipients. Adults ages 18-54 who are physically and mentally able and 
		don’t have dependents must work, volunteer or participate in training 
		programs for at least 80 hours a month, or else be limited to just three 
		months of benefits in a three-year period.
 
 The legislation passed by the House would raise the work requirement to 
		age 65 and also extend it to parents without children younger than age 
		7. The bill also would limit the ability to waive work requirements in 
		areas with high unemployment rates.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
             Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom presents his revised 2025-2026 state 
			budget during a news conference in Sacramento, Calif., May 14, 2025. 
			(AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, file) 
            
			
			
			 The combination of those changes 
			could put 6 million adults at risk of losing SNAP benefits, 
			according to the liberal-leaning Center on Budget and Policy 
			Priorities.
 Like work requirements for Medicaid, those for SNAP tend to cause a 
			decrease in participation without increasing employment, according 
			to an April report by the Brookings Institution’s Hamilton Project.
 
 States that cover immigrants lacking legal status would lose 
			federal funds
 
 Under the bill, the federal government would punish states that use 
			their own state dollars to provide Medicaid-covered services to 
			immigrants lacking legal status or to provide subsidies to help them 
			buy health insurance.
 
 Some states that provide that sort of coverage extend it only to 
			children.
 
 Those states would see federal funding for the Medicaid expansion 
			population — typically low-income adults — drop from 90% to 80%.
 
 That could mean states pull back that Medicaid coverage to avoid the 
			federal penalty, said Joan Alker, executive director of Georgetown 
			University’s Center for Children and Families.
 
 KFF said the provision could affect 14 states that cover children 
			regardless of their immigration status.
 
 This month the Democratic governor of one of them — California's 
			Gavin Newsom — announced a plan to freeze new enrollments of adults 
			in state-funded health care for immigrants who do not have legal 
			status as a budget-balancing measure.
 
 The bill could curtail abortion access by barring money for 
			Planned Parenthood
 
 Planned Parenthood says a provision barring it from receiving 
			Medicaid funds could lead to about one-third of its health centers 
			closing.
 
 The group said about 200 centers are at risk — most of them in 
			states where abortion is legal. In those states, the number of 
			Planned Parenthood centers could be cut in half.
 
 Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, also 
			offers other health services, including birth control and cancer 
			screening.
 
 Federal money was already barred from paying for abortion, but state 
			Medicaid funds in some states now cover it.
 
			
			 “We’re in a fight for survival — not just for Planned Parenthood, 
			but for the ability of everyone to get high-quality, non-judgmental 
			health care,” Planned Parenthood President and CEO Alexis McGill 
			Johnson said in a statement.
 Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America celebrated the provision, saying 
			“Congress took a big step toward stopping taxpayer funding of the 
			Big Abortion industry.”
 
 Health services for transgender people would be cut
 
 Medicaid would stop covering gender-affirming care for people of all 
			ages in 2027 under one provision.
 
 Further, coverage of the treatments could not be required on 
			insurance plans sold through the exchanges under the Affordable Care 
			Act.
 
 Trump has targeted transgender people, who make up around 1% of the 
			U.S. population, since returning to office, including declaring that 
			the U.S. won’t spend taxpayer money on gender-affirming medical care 
			for transgender people under 19. The care includes puberty blockers, 
			hormone therapy and surgeries.
 
 The bill would expand that to all ages, at least when it comes to 
			Medicaid.
 
 Some states already block the coverage, and some require it. It’s 
			unclear how much Medicaid has spent on providing gender-affirming 
			care, which has only been recently added to some coverage plans in 
			some states.
 
 ___
 
 Associated Press reporters Devna Bose in Jackson, Mississippi; 
			Andrew DeMillo in Little Rock, Arkansas; Susan Haigh in Hartford, 
			Connecticut; Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Amanda Seitz in 
			Washington; and Leah Willingham in Boston contributed to this 
			article.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved 
			
			 |