Karen Read files lawsuit alleging 'gross misconduct' by state police
shielded real killers
[November 19, 2025]
By MICHAEL CASEY
BOSTON (AP) — Karen Read, who was found not guilty of charges in the
death of her boyfriend, has filed a lawsuit accusing members of the
Massachusetts State Police and several others of targeting her and
shielding the real killers.
Read walked out of court earlier this year after more than three years
and two trials over the death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer
John O’Keefe, who was found on the lawn of a fellow officer’s home after
a night of heavy drinking.
“For three and a half years, plaintiff Karen Read was wrongly accused of
homicide and subjected to suspicion, arrest, two prosecutions and public
condemnation all resulting from the gross misconduct of the
Massachusetts State Police — and those working in tandem with the MSP —
to shield from liability the party or parties responsible for the death
of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe III,” the lawsuit says
Read was accused of striking O’Keefe, with her SUV in 2022 and leaving
him to die alone in the snow outside of a house party in Canton, a
suburb about 20 miles (32 kilometers) south of Boston. She was been
charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating a
vehicle under the influence and leaving the scene.
A mistrial was declared last year after jurors said they were at an
impasse and deliberating further would be futile. In the second trial, a
jury found her not guilty of second degree murder and manslaughter
charges but did find her guilty of a lesser charge of drunken driving.
Tuesday's lawsuit was filed against several members of the state police
and most of the people at the house party including federal agent Brian
Higgins, Nicole and Brian Albert, whose owned the house, and Jennifer
and Matthew McCabe. It raises many of the allegations Read's defense
team made during her two trials.
The lawsuit alleges O'Keefe was killed at the house party during an
“altercation during a late night house party with other defendants after
a night of heavy drinking.” It says there was a vast conspiracy by
members of a well-connected and close social group in the house to cover
up the crime. It also accused investigators of shoddy police work,
manufacturing evidence and failing to investigate the house for blood,
DNA or other evidence or interview anyone at the house.
“The House Defendants responsible for Mr. O'Keefe's death — some of whom
had professional experience with police investigations — concocted a
plan immediately after the altercation to avoid culpability and frame
Ms. Read,” the lawsuit alleges, adding that state police investigators
allowed those defendants to redirect the investigation away from
themselves and toward Read.
[to top of second column]
|
Karen Read speaks after she was found not guilty of second-degree
murder on June 18, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. (AP Photo/Josh Reynolds,
File)
In statement from their attorneys, Higgins, the McCabes and the
Alberts denied the allegations.
“The allegations made by Karen Read are entirely false, defamatory,
and without merit,” they said in a statement. “Our clients
categorically deny each and every claim. This lawsuit is nothing
more than a continuation of a baseless conspiracy narrative that has
caused significant harm to the reputations and lives of innocent
people. Our clients acted responsibly, fulfilling their civic duty
as witnesses, and have participated appropriately in the legal
process from the outset.”
The lawsuit also alleges the investigation, led by former
Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor, was biased from the
start. Proctor was fired after sharing offensive and sexist texts
about Read with friends, family and co-workers. During the second
trial, Read's defense attorney Alan Jackson argued Proctor’s
“blatant bias” tainted every aspect of the corrupt and flawed
investigation.
In a statement, the Karen Read Civil Team said she “was dragged
through a baseless criminal prosecution engineered by individuals
who abused their authority, manipulated the investigative process,
and trampled her rights."
“Our complaint lays out, in stark detail, the malicious prosecution,
the conspiracy, the civil-rights violations, and the intentional
misconduct that these defendants visited upon an innocent woman,”
the team added.
A spokesman for the Massachusetts State Police did not immediately
respond to a request for comment.
The lawsuit, among other things, alleges malicious prosecution under
the Fourth Amendment and conspiracy to deprive Read of her Fourth
Amendment rights. Her lawyers are demanding a jury trial.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 |
