Abortion advocates raise alarm about social platforms removing posts in
apparent overreach
[September 16, 2025]
By BARBARA ORTUTAY
Clinics, advocacy groups and individuals who share abortion-related
content online say they are seeing informational posts being taken down
even if the posts don't clearly violate the platforms' policies.
The groups, in Latin America and the United States, are denouncing what
they see as censorship even in places where abortion is legal. Companies
like Meta claim their policies have not changed, and experts attribute
the takedowns to over-enforcement at a time when social media platforms
are reducing spending on content moderation in favor of artificial
intelligence systems that struggle with context, nuance and gray areas.
But abortion advocates say the removals have a chilling effect even if
they are later reversed, and navigating platforms' complex systems of
appeals is often difficult, if not impossible.
For months, the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation has
been collecting examples from social media users who've seen their
abortion-related posts taken down or accounts suspended.
“The goal of it was to better understand the breadth of the problem,
who’s affected, and with what consequences. Obviously, then once we had
a better understanding of the trends, we hope to call attention to the
issue, demand accountability and increase transparency in the moderation
practices and ultimately, help stop the platforms from censoring this
essential, sometimes life-saving information,” said Jennifer Pinsof,
staff attorney at EFF.
The organization says it received close to 100 examples of content
takedowns from abortion providers, advocacy groups and individuals on
Meta platforms such as Instagram and Facebook, as well as TikTok and
even LinkedIn.
It's not clear if the takedowns are increasing or people are posting
more about abortion, especially abortion medication such as mifepristone,
since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
“I would say there was a wave of take-downs shortly after the election
that was noticeable enough that it resulted in multiple news stories.
But again, it’s not something that’s very easy to measure,” Pinsof said.
Brenna Miller, a TikTok creator who often posts about abortion and works
in reproductive health care, said she made a video unboxing an abortion
pill package from the nonprofit carafem — where she talked about what
was in the package and discussed the process of taking the pills at
home.
She posted the video in December. It was up for at least a week before
TikTok removed it, saying it violated the platform's community
standards.
“TikTok does have an appeal process, which I tried to go through. And it
just locked me out. It said that I didn’t have the option to appeal it,”
Miller said. “So I started emailing them, trying to get in contact with
a person to just even get an explanation of like, how I violated the
community guidelines with an informational video. It took months for me
to even get in contact with a person and I don’t even (think) it was
really a person. They were sending an automated message for months
straight.”
Eventually, the video was restored in May with no explanation.
“I work in public health in my 9-to-5 and we’re seeing a real
suppression of public health information and dissemination of that
information, particularly in the reproductive health space. And people
are scared,” Miller said. “It’s really important to get people this
medically accurate information so that they’re not afraid and they
actually can access the health care that they need.”
TikTok does not generally prohibit sharing information about abortion or
abortion medication, however it does regulate selling and marketing
drugs, including abortion pills and it prohibits misinformation that
could harm people.
[to top of second column]
|
A patient prepares to take the first of two combination pills,
mifepristone, for a medication abortion during a visit to a clinic
in Kansas City, Kan., Oct. 12, 2022. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel, File)
 On Facebook, the Red River Women's
Clinic in Moorhead, Minnesota, put up a post saying it offers both
surgical and medicated abortion after it heard from a patient who
didn't know it offered medication abortion. The post included a
photo of mifepristone. When the clinic tried to turn the post into
an ad, its account was suspended. The clinic says that since it does
not offer telehealth services, it was not attempting to sell the
medication. The clinic appealed the decision and won a reversal, but
the account was suspended again shortly after. Ultimately, the
clinic was able to resolve the issue through a connection at Meta.
“We were not trying to sell drugs. We were just informing our
followers about a service, a legal service that we offer. So that’s
alarming that, you know, that was flagged as not fitting into their
standards,” said clinic director Tammi Kromenaker. “To have a
private company like Meta just go with the political winds and say,
we don’t agree with this, so we’re going to flag these and we’re
going to shut these down, is very alarming.”
Meta said its policies and enforcement regarding medication-related
abortion content have not changed and were not impacted by the
changes announced in January, which included the end of its
fact-checking program.
“We allow posts and ads promoting health care services like
abortion, as well as discussion and debate around them, as long as
they follow our policies — and we give people the opportunity to
appeal decisions if they think we’ve got it wrong,” the company said
in a statement.
In late January, Emory University's Center for Reproductive Health
Research in the Southeast, or RISE, put up an Instagram post about
mifepristone that described what it is and why it matters. In March,
its account was suspended. The organization then appealed the
decision but the appeal was denied and its account was deleted
permanently. This decision was later reversed after they were able
to connect with someone at Meta. Once the account was restored, it
became clear that the suspension was because it was flagged as
trying to "buy, sell, promote or exchange illegal or restricted
drugs.”
“Where I get concerned is (that) with the increased use of social
media, we also have seen correspondingly an increased rise of
misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms about
many health topics,” said Sara Redd, director of research
translation at RISE and an assistant professor at Emory University.
“One of main goals through our communications and through our social
media is to promote scientifically accurate evidence-based
information about reproductive health care, including abortion.”
Laura Edelson, assistant professor of computer science at
Northeastern University, said that at the end of the day, while
people love to debate platforms' policies and what the policies
should be, what matters is people's “experiences of sharing
information and the information are able to get and they’re able to
see.”
“This is just a policy that is not being implemented well. And that,
in and of itself, is not all that surprising because we know that
Meta has dramatically reduced spending on content moderation
efforts,” Edelson said. “There are fewer people who are spending
time maintaining automated models. And so content that is even
vaguely close to borderline is at risk of being taken down.”
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |
