Thursday, Nov. 2

Firehouse makes second run at referendum          Send a link to a friend

[NOV. 2, 2006]  Lincoln Rural Fire Protection trustees are hoping the referendum on the Nov. 7 election ballot for issuance of $1.3 million in general obligation bonds will pass this time. The referendum was put to the public for the first time with last spring's primary election. It failed by less than 0.5 percent, seven votes.

The funds are needed to build a new firehouse.

Since last March, several financial factors beyond anyone's control have changed, and the building plans have been modified as well.

Lincoln Rural Fire Chief Dean Kukuck provided an update on current conditions and costs changes. He, like the trustees, hopes that with better understanding, voters will see the importance of passing the referendum now. Kukuck said he thought that there are also a few things that could be cleared up for some people and they might vote for it this time.

Interest rates have dropped, but construction costs, concrete and steel, have gone up. There is a lot of steel that would be used in the proposed structure, and that cost is expected to continue increasing.

In March the first projected costs were $1.3 million for facility and some additional equipment; $1.1 million was for the facility. Now the facility alone will take the full $1.3 million.

According to Kukuck, the following are issues that came to light following the last vote:

Some people thought the building cost was high

Smaller fire departments are spending $800,000 to $1,000,000 on buildings without living quarters.

A comparison of construction costs of like facilities, like size and with housing showed those building costs to be higher.

Both state and national averages to build this type of facility are between $120 and $140 per square foot. The projected Lincoln building costs are on the low end at $90 per square foot.

Some people thought the building too big

The area is in a time of growth and the need for services will continue to grow. The trustees wanted to plan ahead to meet future needs in 20 to 30 years and not have the same problems they have now.

Some people thought the building was too fancy

The original design called for brickwork partway up the front of the building in the area of the living quarters, and it had a larger front entry. The brick has been eliminated and the entry reduced in size.

Some people thought the choice of building type is too costly

The trustees reviewed with the architect the places where savings could be made. Any further changes to the proposed design sacrifice quality that would result in a structure that would not be as sound and might not sustain high winds during storms. The options would also reduce the building's longevity.

Whereas a pole building of lesser costs and quality has a 33-year warranty, the proposed design is expected to last 75 to 100 years.

[to top of second column]

Some people thought that the general obligation bonds might be continually renewable

The bonds are a one-time issuance and not renewable. The funds would be applied to this building project.

Funds could not be rolled over at a later date for possible use for purchasing equipment or anything else.

Equipment is purchased as funds become available and as needed. The funds are from fund savings set aside each year from the annual budget and from grants. Or, as seen recently, a truck was bought with funds left from a memorial intended for that use.

Some people thought the rural department could be merged with the city department and save money

The departments are from two separate governmental taxing bodies, with different unions and different salary structures. The combination was tried some years ago and failed.

There is not a savings on equipment, as they use different equipment. In rural areas there usually aren't hydrants to tap into. The rural department has trucks that "pump on the run," such as is often needed for grass and field fires.

The diversity of skills and equipment offered by maintaining separate departments feature is beneficial in both cost and public safety.

Some people were not aware of who pays for rural fire protection services

The rural department services all the surrounding townships outside of Lincoln city limits. City property owners do not pay taxes that go to the rural department. The county collects yearly property taxes for the rural department through a levy.

A house with a market value of $100,000 will see an increase in property taxes of $54.66 per year. Other examples are a $22.51 increase at $50,000 market value, $86.81 for $150,000 and $118.96 at $200,000. Farm acreage taxes will increase 45 cents to 62 cents per acre per year, depending on the township.

The weather on the day of the primary election last March was near-blizzard conditions.

Kukuck said that anyone needing a ride to the polls should call the firehouse, in advance if possible, and transportation would be arranged.

[Jan Youngquist]

Previous related article

           

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor