|
Thoniparambil said many of the middle-class Indians now Tweeting against corruption often have themselves to blame for paying "facilitators" to bribe officials on their behalf. "People of otherwise high integrity and professionalism in their outlook are like lambs led to slaughter when it comes to dealing with the government," he said. "They don't do ten minutes of homework required. Instead they just go pay a bribe." Thoniparambil is working with the transport department in his home state of Karnataka to come up with ways to reduce opportunities for bribery and has launched a campaign to get India to ratify the United Nations' anti-corruption convention, which would require India to strengthen its anti-corruption laws. Under India's 1988 anti-corruption law, offenders face a maximum of five years in prison and unspecified fines, but prosecutions are rare and fines rarely exceed a few hundred dollars, lawyers say. Moreover, only illicit transactions involving a public servant qualify as corruption. Under other laws, corruption in the private sector can be prosecuted but rarely is. Some argue that corruption is a symptom of India's economic adolescence, as reforms begun in the early 1990s transform the country from a state-led to a market-driven economy. "If you look at the state of the U.S. or the U.K. when they were at corresponding points of their democratic capitalism and evolution, they were just as bad," said R. Gopalakrishnan, an executive director at Tata Sons, the Tata group's holding company. "We're only 20 years into our journey." Few believe there will be a quick fix to India's longstanding corruption problem
-- past scandals, after all, have come and gone without leading to lasting change. Critics say New Delhi has not shown the leadership required to stamp out corruption, and many believe eradicating India's culture of graft will require better technology, better education and better management of government services, all of which will take years to effect. Even if tougher anti-corruption legislation does get passed, the law alone is rarely enough in a place like India. Corporate lawyer Nishith Desai said India's anti-corruption laws not only need to be strengthened
-- they need to be enforced. "Without enforcement, law has no meaning," Desai said. More than law, some argue that eradicating corruption requires leadership
-- a strong head of state who can take on powerful families and politicians previously deemed untouchable, said Robert Klitgaard, a professor at Claremont Graduate University in California. "Anyone who goes after corruption has to make it credible and go after impunity," he said. "It means getting some big fish and frying them." ___ Online:
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor