Still Waters,  the em space,  Where They Stand,  By the Numbers,

How We Stack Up,  What's Up With That?

By Mike Fak

[MARCH 28, 2001]  The interesting thing about doing a live call-in show on Channel 15 is that you never know what's going to happen. Jim Ash and I have tried to direct discussions to a specific topic, but more often than not callers set us off in a different direction. It isn't a problem. In fact your calls and your thoughts are what makes the show as successful as it is.

This past week it seems the Fak's Machine broke still newer ground in its mix of callers. On a program that can boast a frequent viewer/caller who is 8 years old and another who is 86, I thought we had seen it all. On a program that can say their viewership not only fields the common person but doctors, lawyers, mayors, sheriffs, judges and every other occupation one can imagine, Jim and I felt we had maxed out the potential demographics of our viewing audience. And then Wednesday night we got a call from the Logan County Jail. Two young men, prisoners at our jail, took turns expressing their concerns about personal issues.

The content of their statements is not important in this article, and since both young men's comments are both questionable and disputable, there is no need for redundancy. The point was, both of the prisoners were polite, carried a civil attitude in their conversation and acted in a way that was suitable for the family audience that watches our program. They followed the rules and thus were allowed to express their views.

That is the crux of our program and, in fact, all of Channel 15. We are determined to place community shows before the public that need no disclaimers before they air. We are steadfast in our belief that people will watch programs that have a sense of humor without off-color remarks. We are certain we can all communicate with each other without name-calling or using derisive adjectives or pronouns. We also understand that opinions about the issues of life are as varied as the people in this world, and we respect those opinions whether we agree with them or not. We do feel we have an obligation to all of you to report on our community's issues that are important, regardless of the fact they sometimes are disheartening or negative. We will report those stories after we are certain we have the entire story and not before.

[to top of second column in this commentary]

You will find my columns in this newspaper because the Lincoln Daily News has those same basic tenets in the way they approach the news. There are no juicy headlines in this paper. There is no content that one would construe as gossip or personal attacks. This newspaper simply tries to inform you of what is occurring in the community, and that is it. Neither Channel 15 nor the Lincoln Daily News is reinventing the wheel, but in this day and age, sometimes it seems like they have to.

It makes me shake my head some days when I visit the Lincolnil.com chat rooms. I read clandestine authors calling each other morons and idiots and jerks. For just one moment do these authors believe their ridicule will sway the other to see their point? Don't they see that their comments, in fact, have become ramblings that have no effect on causing others to see their point of view? They all might as well use an open window as a bathroom.

You see, there is a great deal of good in this community that can grow out of information and opinion expressed in a way that gives respect to the individual. We all need to get back to some of the basic values that have been swept away by the decades. The concept of news without innuendo or personality or personal attacks is as old as the medias themselves. Channel 15 and this newspaper are new to the community. In a way, however, what both are doing is as old as the hills. I hope you will join us. That wheel needs to be reinvented.

[Mike Fak]

Click here to comment on this article.

Welcome to the em space, a staff writer's commentary section with observations about life experiences in Logan County and beyond. 

- Mary Krallmann

Letters in my mailbox last week included two stories with kitchen connections.

One person wrote that she noticed a cup with egg whites still standing on the kitchen table right after she'd put a cake into the oven. So she took the pan out again, scraped out the dough, put it in another mixing bowl, added the egg, mixed it again, put it into another pan and put it back in the oven. She said the cake looked OK when baked, but she did cut out a sample to taste to make sure it was all right. It was a cake she planned to serve as refreshments for a group coming to her home.

The meeting went well, and she shared the remaining pieces of cake with neighbors. Later there was a phone call from one of the women who helped eat the leftovers. She commented on "how good the cake was and that it had an especially nice texture." After they laughed about the problem with getting the batter all together, the neighbor suggested it was "a new improved method for making cake."

Another letter, from someone more likely to make bread than cake, concluded with a toothpick report.

"Was running low on toothpicks," he said, "but couldn't find them in the store. Figured they would be near the baking cups, or possibly the dental floss. No luck. Finally stumbled across them in the paper plate section!"

When I tried to think where I would look for toothpicks in the grocery stores where I shop, I wasn't sure. Then I looked in the kitchen cabinet and found a good reason why I didn't know. According to the tags on the containers, my most recent toothpick purchase, two boxes for $1, came from Wal-Mart instead.

With hundreds of the little "square-center round" sticks remaining, I won't lose sleep over where to find more when I want some.

I don't remember how long ago I bought them. The text on the boxes mentions 1887, but it says that's when someone named Charles Forster started the first wooden toothpick factory in this country.

For more recent history from the kitchen cabinet, there are two containers of a salt blend. They were definitely not a "two-for" deal. In fact, I bought them years apart. The older one — the shaker with a few hardened white chunks rattling around at the bottom — shows a 1990 copyright on the label.

At home I learned to put butter and salt on roasting ears and popcorn, but since then I haven't added much salt to anything. A quick look at the table of nutrition facts on almost any processed food confirms that plenty of sodium is in there already. On the rare occasions when I bake and the recipe mentions salt, I've substituted from the aging container of "iodized lite salt blend" and usually cut down the amount besides. A 2-ounce supply lasts a long time that way.

It must have been the making of the most recent pumpkin pie that prompted me to start on a new container.

In spite of the age difference, the paper labels on the two looked almost the same, with white lettering surrounded by brightly colored markings on a background of black. The list of ingredients showed no change. The UPC numbers matched, except that the newer bottle had one additional numeral at the end. Instead of today's standard table of nutrition information, the older product presented a chart with vertical bars comparing the amount of sodium in various salts.

The difference that caught my attention was the change in identification. The older version was called "Lite-Lite-Lite-Salt." The label on the newer container says merely "Lite Salt."

Seeking an explanation, I checked the numerical details on each label but found no significant difference. Both indicate "85% less sodium than table salt." In both cases the serving size stated is one-fourth teaspoon.

The newer container says a single serving has 85 mg of sodium, while the older, triple-lite product has slightly more, at 90 mg. Following the same pattern, the newer label reports that regular salt has 590 mg of sodium per serving, while the older figure is 595 mg.

Evidently the difference between triple-lite and lite is measured more in years than milligrams. The new, improved version adds 5 mg and cuts back on two words.

In summary, if you have baking plans, remember the whites, don't take the "lites" too seriously, and be sure to allow enough time to stumble across the toothpicks.

[Mary Krallmann]

Where They Stand

Where They Stand is a commentary section that poses a question about a specific issue in the community. Informed individuals present their position with facts, opinions or insights on the issue. The following commentaries have been printed, unedited, in their entirety, as they were received. If you have further comment on the issue, please send an e-mail message, complete with your name, address and telephone number to ldneditor@lincolndailynews.com.

District vs. at large

April 3 ballot proposition:  "Shall Logan County be divided into districts equal in population for the purpose of electing County Board members to serve on the Logan County Board commencing in the year 2002?"

YES!

In January of this year, citizens throughout Logan County circulated petitions to place this issue on the ballot. That effort was successful with more than 10% of registered voters signing within a two-week period (2569 total/2000 needed). The referendum has been certified by the Logan County Clerk and will be on the April 3^rd ballot throughout the county. The citizens were successful and will be able to voice their opinion on this matter for the first time in 30 years!

Illinois law states that every ten years each county in Illinois with a township form of government shall determine whether board members shall be elected "at large" from the county or by county board "districts".

A "YES" vote on this issue will indicate that residents of Logan County want to have their County Board members representing all areas of the county. Each district must be divided equally in population and will guarantee that all areas are represented! The present "at large" system allows for all 13 County Board members to be elected from one area, while the remainder of the county could end up with no one. In fact, the east side of our county (from Mt. Pulaski to Atlanta) does not have representation at the present time! All of the counties surrounding Logan are in districts. Menard recently changed from "at large" to "districts" with an overwhelming vote. The greater majority of counties in Illinois are in districts and have been for several years. We are not the only county with this issue on the ballot. Bureau County recently passed a referendum to go to single member districts. Champaign County has a similar question, as does Adams County.

Remember that this question asks how the make-up of the County Board should be for the next ten years. Under a district system the voter is more likely to know the person they are voting for. This is your opportunity to voice your opinion and let your county governing body know how you feel. If the referendum produces a result in FAVOR of district representation, then measures will be introduced on the floor of the Logan County Board to accomplish that goal.

—Rodney J. White

(Rodney White is a member of the Logan County Board.)

NO!

It’s rather interesting and enlightening to note the places of residence of people appointed to the Logan County Board to fill terms of members who have died, moved away, or resigned.

Mr. Robert "Bud" Behrends was appointed to the Logan County Board March 18, 1975, to finish out the term of Robert E. Downing, and Lloyd Hellman was appointed November 15, 1994, to finish out Robert "Bud" Behrends term on the board. Mr. Behrends grew up in the Hartsburg area, and spent most of his life in Lincoln, and Mr. Hellman, who replaced "Bud" has spent most of his life in the rural Emden area. Mr. Downing was a rural Beason farmer.

The emphasis on appointments was the type of person needed to effectively function on the board; not where they resided. A Beason resident (Mr. Downing) was replaced by a Hartsburg/Lincoln resident (Mr. Behrends), who was replaced by Mr. Hellman, an Emden resident.

The above appointments don’t look like "district" representation. It looks like desire on the part of the replacements and their ability to effectively function on the Logan County Board.

Mark H. Werth resigned from the board December 31, 1988. L. Buckles was appointed to replace Mr. Werth, February 20, 1989. Both were from rural areas -- Mr. Werth, rural area north of Mt. Pulaski, and Mr. Buckles, rural area south of Mt. Pulaski.

Mr. Earl Madigan, who lived southeast of Lincoln, was replaced by Dwight Zimmerman, who farmed for years just east of San Jose and later lived in Lincoln. That certainly wasn’t a "district" appointment. That was an appointment based on the desire of the person to serve and his ability to serve.

Mr. Edward L. Spellman, resigned from the board March 18, 1976, and Mr. Don Smith was appointed to take his place. both came from Lincoln, Both were successful business people and served well on the board.

Mr. Robert Welch died in office November 18, 1998. He was a resident of rural Beason. Mr. Roger Bock of rural Williamsville was appointed to replace him. Again, not a "district" appointment, but one based on desire and ability.

To my knowledge, no proponent of the district plan for electing members of the Logan County Board has ever submitted a plan, so my question is: If the at large system of electing county board members is not flawed, why fix it?

If the system is working well and the members are getting the work of county government done, why change?

Will a district election plan, which apparently is only floating around in the minds of a few people and has not been committed to paper, better serve all the people of all the county?? I think not!!!

—Dick Hurley

(Dick Hurley is a former member of the Logan County Board.)

By the Numbers

Local figures are as follows:

Logan County = $44,078.23

(Counties receive an allocation on the basis of motor vehicle registration fees, with the exception of Cook County, which has a percentage allocation set by law.)

Townships and road districts = $90,973.85

(Townships and road districts are allocated an amount computed on the basis of mileage in their jurisdiction.)

City of Lincoln = $38,003.84

(Cities receive an allocation based on population.)

[Source: Economic Development report]

Alexis Asher

Alexis Asher

Lincoln High School history

1859

Lincoln School District

5

School buildings in 1859

1

"Grammar school" in 1859

1

High school teacher, Mr. January, in 1859

1870-71

Central School opened

1898

High school building started

1900

High school dedicated, Jan. 5

$20,000

Cost of new high school

1920

Election authorized community high school District #404

1958

Dedication of new Lincoln Community High School, 1000 Primm Road, in auditorium, on Nov. 9

Alexis Asher

How We Stack Up

Racial makeup of selected Illinois counties

What's Up With That?

When you look around, you will probably find something interesting to look at here in Logan County.
For instance, sitting just north of Lincoln near I-55, this trailer home looks a little odd up on stilts.  But if you look closely, it makes perfect sense, as it stands above the expanding waters of the nearby barrow-pit pond.  

 Innovation is alive and well here in Logan County.

Back to top

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Letters to the Editor