| 
        
        
            | Features, 
Honors
                    & Awards,  Ag
                    Announcements 
Calendar, 
                    Ag News Elsewhere 
(fresh daily from the Web)
             |  
            | Features
             |  
            | 
            
            Biotech crop use 
            benefits environment [JUNE
            29, 2002]  The 
            Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, a non-profit 
            consortium of scientists, released a comprehensive report on June 25 
            detailing the environmental safety and environmental benefits of 
            commercial biotechnology-derived soy, corn and cotton crops. |  
            | 
            "In the past, isolated studies 
            regarding the environmental impact of biotechnology-derived crops 
            appeared to present conflicting results," said Teresa Gruber, the 
            executive vice president of CAST. "Teams of researchers assembled by 
            CAST have reviewed and analyzed the published studies in the context 
            of current farming practices, and the results clearly show that 
            soil, air and water quality are enhanced through the responsible use 
            of current biotechnology-derived soybean, corn and cotton crops." 
            Three independent teams of CAST 
            researchers reviewed the available scientific literature to compare 
            the environmental impacts of biotechnology-derived and traditional 
            crops. The researchers are affiliated with Washington State 
            University, the University of Illinois, Clemson University, and the 
            National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. 
              
       
            "The study was based on nine criteria, 
            including changes in pesticide use patterns, impacts on beneficial 
            insects, pest resistance, soil management, land use efficiency, 
            impacts on biodiversity and, of course, human exposure," said Allan 
            Felsot, Washington State University professor. 
            Specific findings for one of the most 
            widely planted biotech-derived crops, herbicide-tolerant soybeans, 
            include the following:  
            •  Soil quality — No-till 
            soybean acreage in the United States has increased significantly 
            since the introduction of herbicide-tolerant soybeans. No-till often 
            results in less soil erosion, dust and pesticide runoff as well as 
            increased soil moisture retention.  
            •  Water quality — Use of 
            biotechnology-derived soybeans enables farmers to use a more benign 
            herbicide that rapidly dissipates in the soil and water. 
            •  Air quality — Greenhouse 
            gas emissions from some farm operations decreased by an estimated 88 
            percent as a result of biotech soybeans planted in a no-tillage 
            system, which may help slow global warming. 
            •  Biodiversity — The 
            no-till practices commonly associated with biotech soybeans provide 
            a more favorable habitat for birds and other wildlife. No-tillage 
            systems provide food and shelter for wildlife such as pheasants and 
            ducks. 
            •  Land use efficiency — 
            Biotechnology-derived soybeans may lead to increased yields through 
            improved weed control and the adoption of narrow-row spacing. 
            The study found similar benefits for 
            corn and cotton crops derived through biotechnology. David Onstad 
            from the University of Illinois was one of two scientists who 
            prepared the corn portion of the report.  
             [to top of second 
            column in this article]
             | 
 
            "We literally reviewed hundreds of 
            scientific documents, and we concluded that biotechnology-derived 
            corn has had a positive effect on the environment," Onstad said. 
              
      
       
            Corn was a more complicated crop to 
            review because there is Bt corn to control insects, there are 
            herbicide-resistant hybrids, and there are hybrids used for animal 
            feed as well as human food. 
            "Definitely, Bt corn has reduced 
            pesticide use," Onsatd said. "And there was no evidence that 
            non-target species are affected in a negative way by 
            biotechnology-derived hybrids. There was no evidence that these 
            hybrids have or will become off-site weeds either." 
            "Also, we expect that human exposure to 
            toxins has been reduced by the use of biotechnology-derived corn 
            hybrids — both toxins from chemical pesticides as well as naturally 
            occurring toxins such as aflatoxin." 
            Onstad says that although we have had 
            positive environmental impacts from biotechnology-derived corn, 
            soybean and cotton, we need to continue to monitor present and 
            future biotechnology-derived crops and conduct public-based research 
            to measure their efficacy. He says the report contains 10 
            recommendations about the research needed to effectively monitor 
            emerging biotech crops and technologies. 
              
            
             
            The USDA’s "Prospective Plantings," 
            published in March, estimated that 20 percent of Illinois’ corn 
            acreage was planted with biotechnology-derived insect protection and 
            3 percent was planted with biotechnology-derived herbicide 
            tolerance. The same report estimated that 71 percent of Illinois’ 
            soybean acreage was planted with biotechnology-derived herbicide 
            tolerance. 
            The United Soybean Board, a nonprofit 
            organization representing soybean farmers in United States, 
            commissioned the report. 
            Founded in 1972, CAST is a nonprofit 
            organization composed of scientific societies and many individual, 
            student, company, nonprofit and associate society members. CAST 
            assembles, interprets and communicates science-based information 
            regionally, nationally and internationally on food, fiber, 
            agricultural, natural resource and related societal and 
            environmental issues to stakeholders — legislators, regulators, 
            policymakers, the media, the private sector and the public. 
            The full report is available at the 
            following Web address: 
            
            http://www.cast-science.org/biotechnology/index.html#biotechcropsbenefit.
 
            [U of I news release] |  
          | 
        |  
          | 
 |  
            | 
            
            
            U of I report provides guidanceon updating acres, yields
 [JUNE
            27, 2002]  
            URBANA — A recent University of Illinois Extension report 
            examines changes in the new farm bill and offers producers a method 
            for selecting between four alternatives in updating acres and 
            yields. "Updating Acres and Yields under the Farm Security and Rural 
            Investment Act of 2002" was prepared by Gary Schnitkey and Dale 
            Lattz, U of I Extension farm management specialists. |  
            | "The new law includes 
            provisions authorizing direct and counter-cyclical payments for 2002 
            through 2007 crops," said Schnitkey. "These payments will be 
            determined using base acres and program yields. Farmers and 
            landowners have one-time decisions to make concerning these acres 
            and yields. They either can ‘update’ acres to reflect acres from 
            1998 through 2001 or they can ‘not update’ and have acres based on 
            those used to calculate Agricultural Marketing Transition Act (AMTA) 
            payments. "If base acres are 
            updated, farmers also can update yields used to determine 
            counter-cyclical payments." Under the new law, 
            three types of payments are available for program crops — direct 
            payments, counter-cyclical payments and loan deficiency/marketing 
            loan payments. Direct payments are 
            available for corn, soybeans, wheat, oats, grain sorghum, barley, 
            upland cotton and rice. Payments will be made for 2002 through 2007 
            crops, and the payment will be the same in each year. Payments for a 
            crop on a farm will equal per-bushel payment rate times program 
            yield times the result of base acres times .85. "The 2002 program 
            implemented a counter-cyclical program for all program crops," said 
            Schnitkey. "Those payments equal the trigger price, which is the 
            higher of loan rate or season-average price, times yield times base 
            acres times .85." The trigger price, he 
            explained, equals a target price minus the direct payment rate. The 
            season-average price is calculated by the USDA for 12 months, with 
            the first month occurring near the beginning of harvest.   [to top of second column in this
            article] | 
 "The yield is an 
            important variable that farmers have to make a decision about," he 
            noted. Schnitkey summarized 
            the options available to producers. "When base acres are 
            not updated, programs yields are also used to determine 
            counter-cyclical payments," he said. "Farmers can choose to update 
            acres and use program yields in determining counter-cyclical 
            payments. Another option is to update acres and use the 70 percent 
            difference method to update yields. Finally, farmers can update 
            acres and use the 93.5 percent method to update yields." Schnitkey and Lattz 
            note that in some cases farmers will have to trade off the corn base 
            acre for the ability to update yields. For example, some farms have 
            a relatively high corn base compared to the current corn plantings. 
            Updating acres will result in the loss of corn base acres, 
            suggesting that the farm maintain its current base acres. However, 
            maintaining current base acres will not allow a farmer to update 
            yields, meaning that the counter-cyclical payments will be lower 
            than when base acres are updated. The report examines a 
            number of options available to producers in making these choices. Copies of the report can be accessed on 
            the Web at 
            http://web.aces.uiuc.edu/farm.doc/manage/newsletters/fefo02_11.html.
 
            [U of I news release] |  
          | 
 |  
            | 
            
            Weekly outlook: Reports and prices [JUNE
            26, 2002]  
            URBANA — Weather conditions 
            and crop prospects will be the dominating price factors for the next 
            few months, said a University of Illinois Extension marketing 
            specialist. |  
            | 
            "U.S. corn and soybean yield prospects 
            may be the most important price factors, but developments in other 
            areas will also be critically important," said Darrel Good. "In 
            particular, the market is taking note of dry conditions in 
            Australia, flooding in parts of China and Russia, and the slow 
            development of the monsoon in India. 
            "For coarse grains, world production 
            has been at a relatively high level since 1995-96. Individual 
            countries have had shortfalls in production, but the U.S. has had 
            consistently large crops since 1996." 
            For wheat, Good added, world production 
            has been relatively large since the consecutive small crops of 
            1994-95 and 1995-96. 
            "The current relatively low level of 
            U.S. and world stocks and the generally low prices of wheat and 
            coarse grains suggest that production shortfalls could have 
            significant price impacts," he said. "The market is beginning to 
            reflect production concerns, but price action may be relatively 
            conservative until the U.S. crops reach the critical reproductive 
            stages of growth." 
            Good’s comments came as he reviewed the 
            markets where corn and soybean prices continue to demonstrate 
            seasonal strength, influenced by a high rate of consumption and U.S. 
            and world crop concerns. 
            For soybeans, both the domestic crush 
            and exports continue at a pace above that projected by the USDA. The 
            expected return of China to the import market should keep the pace 
            of U.S. exports high, especially in the light of continued problems 
            in Argentina. 
            "Based on the USDA’s weekly export 
            inspection report, U.S. exports through June 20 were 5 percent 
            larger than cumulative shipments of a year ago," said Good. "For the 
            year, the USDA has projected a 3.5 percent increase. Unshipped sales 
            as of June 13 totaled some 97.5 million bushels, compared to 74.2 
            million bushels of outstanding sales on the same date last year. 
            "Similarly, the cumulative domestic 
            crush during the first three quarters of the marketing year is 
            estimated at 1.3 billion bushels, 4.7 percent larger than the crush 
            during the same period last year. For the year, the USDA has 
            projected an increase of 3.3 percent." 
              
               
             [to top of second column in this
            article]
             | 
 
            Good said that for corn, the pace of 
            exports compared to that of last year, accelerated in the second and 
            third quarters of the marketing year. The USDA’s export inspection 
            report indicated that cumulative shipments as of June 20 were 3 
            percent larger than the total of a year ago. However, unshipped 
            sales as of June 13 totaled 252.5 million bushels, compared to 290.1 
            million on the same date last year. For the year, the USDA projects 
            that exports will reach 1.925 billion bushels, 10 million less than 
            shipments of a year ago. 
            "Corn exports were very large during 
            the summer of 2001," said Good. "The recent rapid pace of shipments 
            will have to continue if the USDA projection is to be reached." 
            The USDA’s June Grain Stocks report 
            will be released on June 28. The market will use the June 1 corn 
            stocks estimate to gauge the rate of domestic use of corn during the 
            third quarter of the marketing year. 
            "If the pace of consumption was in line 
            with the USDA projection, June 1 stocks of corn should have been 
            near 3.67 billion bushels, about 250 million less than on the same 
            date last year," said Good. "Soybean stocks on June 1 should have 
            been near 690 million bushels, based on the estimates of use during 
            the third quarter of the year." 
            In addition to the grain stocks report, 
            the market will have considerable interest in the acreage report to 
            be released on the same date.  
            "Late planting, particularly in the 
            eastern Corn Belt, suggests that the acreage report will reflect a 
            fair amount of intentions rather than actual plantings," said Good. 
            "Still, the report will be an important benchmark for judging the 
            final planted acreage of the major crops. The market expects the 
            report to show a significant switch from corn to soybean acreage due 
            to the lateness of the planting season in some areas. "The report 
            is also expected to reflect failed wheat acres being planted to 
            other crops. Some private analysts have projected a significant 
            increase in sorghum acreage, compared to March intentions, due to 
            replanting of failed wheat acreage. In addition to the acreage of 
            individual crops, the report will give some perspective on the 
            magnitude of abandoned acreage." [U of I 
            news release] |  
          | 
 |  
            | 
            
            Weekly outlook: USDA reports [JUNE
            25, 2002]  
            URBANA — It is premature to 
            suggest that the highest corn and soybean prices of the year have 
            been established, said a University of Illinois Extension marketing 
            specialist. |  
            | 
            "Consumption of both corn and soybeans 
            continue at a rapid pace, and considerable production uncertainty 
            remains," said Darrel Good. "Some sort of averaging strategy for 
            pricing remaining old crop inventories still appears attractive. 
            "New crop soybean prices are still 
            below the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) loan rate. Harvest 
            delivery prices for corn are marginally below the loan rate in most 
            areas. The market is offering an average price of about $2.15 for 
            delivery from harvest to the summer of 2003. That is equal to the 
            midpoint of the USDA’s projection for the marketing year average 
            price." 
            Good’s comments came as he reviewed 
            recent USDA reports. The monthly reports of World Agricultural 
            Supply and Demand Estimates and Crop Production provided some 
            fundamental support for corn and wheat price prospects. In the case 
            of wheat, the USDA now forecasts the 2002 U.S. crop at only 1.823 
            billion bushels, which is 63 million smaller than the May forecast 
            and 135 million smaller than the 2001 harvest. The forecast 
            represents the smallest crop since 1988. U.S. stocks at the end of 
            the 2002-03 marketing year are projected at 555 million bushels, the 
            smallest year-ending inventory in six years. 
            Wheat production in the rest of the 
            world is forecast at 540.2 million tons. That forecast is 2.6 
            percent larger than the 2001-02 crop but 4.2 million tons smaller 
            than the May forecast. 
            "Compared to last month’s forecast, 
            smaller crops are expected in Australia, China, eastern Europe and 
            the former Soviet Union," said Good. "World wheat stocks are 
            expected to decline for the third consecutive year. Still, wheat 
            supplies are expected to be large enough that consumption can 
            continue at a normal pace." 
            For corn, the major surprise in the 
            June report was a smaller forecast of the 2002 U.S. crop. The May 
            forecast was based on the March Prospective Plantings report and 
            trend yields. This month, the USDA lowered its expectation of corn 
            plantings by one million acres due to delayed planting in the 
            eastern Corn Belt. In addition, the projected average yield was 
            reduced from 137.9 bushels to 135.8 bushels to reflect the expected 
            impact of late planting. 
            As a result, the 2002 crop is now 
            forecast at 9.65 billion bushels, 285 million smaller than the May 
            forecast and only 143 million larger than the 2001 crop. With 
            expanded exports and increased domestic processing use of corn, the 
            smaller crop is expected to reduce stocks at the end of the 2002-03 
            marketing year to 1.3 billion bushels, the lowest level in six 
            years.  
             [to top of second column in this
            article]
             | 
 
            "While this month’s downward revision 
            in the projected size of the 2002 U.S. corn crop was a friendly 
            surprise, the market had a modest response," said Good. "The reduced 
            forecast was logical, but there is still a lot of uncertainty about 
            both acreage and yield. The USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics 
            Service will release an acreage report on June 28. This report will 
            reflect an early June survey, so it will not be the final word on 
            planted acreage. 
            "However, the report will provide a 
            good benchmark for judging actual planted acreage. Yield prospects 
            will reflect weather conditions for the remainder of the summer. The 
            National Weather Service is projecting near-normal precipitation and 
            temperature for the majority of the growing season. The market will 
            continue to take a wait-and-see attitude about yield prospects." 
            The June report also contained a 
            smaller forecast of foreign coarse grain production. At 629 million 
            tons, the forecast is 2.2 percent larger than last year’s crop, but 
            1.7 million tons smaller than the May forecast. World coarse grain 
            stocks at the end of the 2002-03 marketing year are forecast at 
            111.2 million tons, the lowest year-ending inventory in seven years. 
            For the 2002-03 U.S. soybean marketing 
            year, the USDA lowered the projection of beginning stocks by 20 
            million bushels, increased the 2002 crop projection by 20 million 
            bushels, reduced the export projection by 10 million, and increased 
            the projection of year-ending stocks by 10 million bushels. The 
            first projections for the 2002-03 marketing year for the rest of the 
            world will be released next month. 
            "The average daily cash price of corn 
            in central Illinois moved to the highest level since harvest on June 
            13, while the highest post-harvest price of soybeans was established 
            on June 5," said Good. "It is common for the highest cash prices of 
            the marketing year to be established in June. The relatively 
            favorable near-term weather outlook suggests that prices may soften 
            somewhat." However, 
            Good repeated, it is too early to assume that the highest prices of 
            the year have been reached. [U 
            of I news release] |  
          | 
 |  
            | 
            The farm bill [JUNE
            24, 2002]  
            With a new farm bill in place, the 
            questions turn to how to make the most of some opportunities this 
            farm bill provides. Keep in mind that information is just now coming 
            out on the bill and is not from the official source (the Farm 
            Service Agency). It just seems like U of I Professor Bob Hauser has 
            just about the best information out there at this time. |  
            | 
            Provisions of the farm bill, as now known, are these: the Loan Rate 
            Program, counter-cyclical payments, direct payments, payment caps, 
            Conservation Title, and changes to programs for milk and wool and 
            for mohair, to name a few. 
            Loan rates were basically increased for corn and decreased for 
            soybeans. The 2002 loan rates are $2.06 for corn and 5.16 for 
            soybeans in Logan County. This is changed from $1.95 and 5.41 for 
            2001. These rates come in to play with market prices that are below 
            these rates.  
            The Counter Cyclical Program is based on a 12-month price average, 
            to compensate producers during very low commodity price periods. 
            Payments will be triggered when corn prices fall below $2.32 per 
            bushel for 2002 and 2003, and $5.36 for soybeans. These payments are 
            figured on payment bushels.   [to top 
            of second column in this article]
             | 
             
            The Direct Payment Program provides a fixed payment of 28 cents per 
            bushel of corn and 44 cents per bushel of soybeans, based on payment 
            bushels. 
            Many of the other provisions are still being checked out, but for 
            most farmers in our area it looks like about $15 per acre more will 
            be available than under the past farm bill. For more information, 
            follow the U of I Farmdoc link:
            
            http://web.aces.uiuc.edu/farm.doc/policy/index.html. There is also a calculator there to look at 
            some of those scenarios that are available to you.
 
            [John Fulton] |  
          | 
 |  
            | 
            
            Local FFA shines at convention [JUNE
            22, 2002]  
            Floods of blue corduroy jackets filled the Prairie 
            Capital Convention Center June 11 to kick off the 74th annual 
            Illinois FFA Convention. FFA members from across the state were 
            recognized for their outstanding achievements throughout the year. |  
            | Section 14 members 
            were very involved over the three-day convention with luncheons, 
            main sessions and elections. Illinois FFA members 
            and guests were honored to have our national FFA secretary, Robin 
            Niehaus, visiting her home state for the convention. The newly elected 
            2002-2003 Illinois FFA officer team is Jay Kelley of Section 5, 
            president; Rebecca Yandell from Section 25, vice president; Emilee 
            Bocker of Section 2, reporter; Drew DeRiemacker from Section 3, 
            secretary; and Meagan Wells of Section 23, treasurer. Aside from elections, 
            Section 14 members received various awards. Kent Leesman racked up 
            awards in the Risk Management Essay Contest, being in the top ten in 
            the nation, being a top ten chapter president and a STAR Farmer 
            finalist. Chelsea Frost of PORTA was an FFA talent performer, along 
            with several Section 14 members in the FFA Band and Chorus. Natalie 
            Coers of the Hartsburg-Emden FFA Chapter was named among the top ten 
            chapter reporters.   [to top of second column in
this article] | 
 Kate Wrage of the 
            Hartsburg-Emden FFA Chapter was recognized as the Section 14 
            candidate for her American FFA degree. Eleven Section 14 FFA 
            members were honored to receive their state FFA degree as the 
            convention came to a close. For more information about the Illinois 
            FFA, visit www.illinoisffa.org 
            or www.ffa.org. [Natalie 
            Coers, Section 14 FFA reporter] |  
          | 
 |  
            | 
            
            Illinois FFA convention news [JUNE
            17, 2002]  
            As the 74th state FFA 
            convention got under way last week, Section 14 members gained 
            recognition for their outstanding achievements from the past year. |  
            | 
            At the second session three Section 14 
            members were recognized for winning their respective proficiency 
            areas. Kent Leesman of Hartsburg-Emden won in the Grain Production 
            Entrepreneurship area for his work on the family farm. Chelsea Frost 
            of Porta won in the Safety area for her work as a lifeguard, and 
            John Sullivan of Porta won in Wildife Production and Management 
            Entrepreneurship.   
            Also, Kate Wrage of Hartsburg-Emden was 
            recognized for being a Section 14 American FFA Degree candidate. | 
            Robin Niehaus, the national FFA 
            secretary, gave the keynote address entitled "Full Speed Ahead."  
            She challenged FFA members and guests to sing in the car, put the 
            pedal to the metal and turn on their headlights for a journey of a 
            lifetime. We wish all 
            the members who received awards the best of luck in national 
            competition. [Natalie 
            Coers, Section 14 FFA reporter]   |  
          | 
 |  
            | 
            
            Bt corn doesn’t 
            harmearthworm populations
 [JUNE
            17, 2002]  
            URBANA — Creatures in the 
            soil, such as earthworms and mites, have a positive effect on soil 
            quality and, in the long run, farmers may want to manage their soils 
            to protect and nurture these creatures. This is the focus of a new 
            study at the University of Illinois and the Illinois Natural History 
            Survey. |  
            | 
            "We know soil invertebrates are 
            beneficial," said Ed Zaborski, a soil invertebrate ecologist with 
            the Illinois Natural History Survey. "They have a positive impact on 
            the soil system and, ideally, we would like to manage farmland to 
            produce the best possible benefits from them." 
            Zaborski’s study looks at earthworms 
            and mites as possible indicators of soil condition and how they 
            respond to insect control strategies. He makes up bags of crop 
            residues and buries them in field plots consisting of three 
            different corn hybrids, each with a Bt line and a non-Bt line. Half 
            of the plots are treated with insecticides. Every few weeks, some of 
            the bags are collected and the invertebrates extracted. Through the 
            process, he can discover the numbers and species of invertebrates 
            that are decomposing the residue. 
            "We can determine the impact of 
            insecticides, the growing crop and the quality of the residues. 
            After analyzing the residues, we’ll know the rate of decomposition 
            for several points in time. So, we can look at the effect of insect 
            control strategies on the soil process and decomposition." 
            Zaborski says there doesn't seem to be 
            any negative effect to earthworms caused by the Bt endotoxin. 
            "For the lines of corn used in our 
            study, it looks like the impact of genetically engineering corn to 
            produce the Bt toxin was no greater than the genetic differences 
            between various corn hybrids." 
            He has also discovered that certain 
            soil mites might respond to a particular residue based partially on 
            their reproductive strategy. Invertebrates that reproduce quickly 
            and in large numbers when food is plentiful are known as "r" 
            strategists. In one corn variety, mites with these characteristics 
            were more abundant on residue containing the Bt gene than on the 
            non-Bt variety.     [to top of second column in this
            article]
             | 
 
            "One reason could be that, if the plant 
            could not break down the Bt toxin, some residues would be slightly 
            higher in nitrogen. That means there’s a greater amount of protein 
            available there to support a rush of microbial activity, and mites 
            would benefit from feeding on these microbes." 
            Zaborski’s approach is a unique way to 
            study the effect of Bt crops on the soil. 
            "Often, researchers test a very small 
            set of animals. I’m looking at a couple hundred different species. 
            It’s a whole interacting, functioning community. And I’m measuring 
            the community, instead of individual species, which offers a much 
            better chance of finding any risk associated with the technology," 
            he said. 
            Initial results also show that, in 
            crops treated with insecticides, juvenile night crawlers were more 
            abundant than in crops not sprayed with insecticides. "We’re not 
            sure why this happened," he said. "One hypothesis is that the 
            insecticides killed spiders and beetles that would be predators of 
            earthworms. So the spraying improves the reproductive success of 
            earthworms. Unfortunately, those predators can also help control 
            crop pest." 
            [Gary Beaumont,University of Illinois College of ACES]
 
        |  
          | 
 |  
            | Honors
              & Awards
             |  
            | 
            
            Hartem FFA brings home 
            awards [JUNE
            29, 2002]  
            Hartsburg-Emden FFA members recently attended the 74th 
            Illinois FFA Convention. Chapter members received numerous awards 
            and recognitions as well as enjoying the main session. |  
            | Brittney Kavanaugh 
            received a blue ribbon for her agri-science fair project at the 
            state competition. Kent Leesman was 
            recognized for his outstanding achievements this past year as a top 
            chapter president, Star Farmer finalist, Grain Production 
            Proficiency winner, and National Risk Management Essay winner. Natalie Coers was 
            recognized for her achievements as a top ten chapter reporter, as 
            well as participating in the state FFA band. Nic Coers, Daniel 
            Eeten and Kent Leesman were honored to receive their state FFA 
            degrees at the convention. Although individual chapter members 
            brought home the awards, the Hartem FFA chapter also gained 
            recognition. Hartem FFA won the Co-op Award, Triple Crown Heritage 
            Award, Century Challenge Sweepstakes Award, and was named a Gold 
            Emblem Chapter. The convention proved to be a show of excellence for 
            all of the FFA members and chapters from across the state. 
            [News release] | 
 Img24 [Hartem FFA state degree recipients] Img08 [Kent Leesman and adviser Betsy Pech are 
            recognized for the risk management essay.] Img21 [Hartem FFA members ready for the closing of 
            "Journey of a Lifetime."] |  
          | 
 |  
            | 
            
            Logan County 4-H 
            Bicycle Show results [JUNE
            26, 2002]  
            The Logan County 4-H Bicycle 
            Show was on June 15. Ten 4-H’ers participated in this year’s show. 
            Mathew Runyon of Broadwell won the bicycle award, donated by 
            Lincoln McDonald’s Restaurant. |  
            | Chosen 
            as state fair delegates were Mathew Runyon of Broadwell, Bicycle 
            Adventures II; Ben Buse, Beason, Bicycle Adventures II; Kelli 
            Brooks, Lincoln, Bicycle Adventures II; and John Brooks, Lincoln, 
            Bicycle Adventures III. Chosen 
            as a state fair alternate was Zack Huffer, Lincoln, Bicycle 
            Adventures II. All 4-H 
            participants and their ratings are listed below. 2002 4-H Bicycle Show 
            results Bicycle award Mathew 
            Runyon, Broadwell Top rating award Max Buse, 
            Beason   [to top of second column in
this article] | 
             Blue awards Bicycle 
            Adventures I — David Carter, Lincoln; Ryan Huffer, Lincoln; Hayden 
            Zimmer, Lincoln Bicycle 
            Adventures II — Douglas Alberts, Hartsburg; Kelli Brooks, Lincoln; 
            Ben Buse, Beason; Max Buse, Beason; Zack Huffer, Lincoln; Mathew 
            Runyon, Broadwell Bicycle 
            Adventures III — John Brooks, Lincoln State fair delegates Bicycle 
            Adventures II — Kelli Brooks, Ben Buse, Mathew Runyon Bicycle 
            Adventures III — John Brooks, Lincoln State fair alternate Bicycle 
            Adventures II — Zack Huffer, Lincoln 
            For further information on Logan County 
            4-H, contact the Logan County 4-H office, 980 N. Postville Drive, 
            Lincoln, IL 62656; or phone (217) 732-8289. 
            [News release] 
             |  
          | 
 |  
            | Ag
              Announcements
             |  |