| 
            "Extremely dry soil conditions in some 
            producing areas have the market's attention," said Darrel Good. 
            "Timely spring and summer precipitation will be required to quiet 
            the drought concerns. With prospects for small year-ending stocks, 
            another year of sub-par yields would require some rationing of the 
            2003 crop. 
            "For now, it appears that March futures 
            may test the early January high near $2.45 and perhaps the late 
            November highs near $2.50. While it is a little early to be too 
            concerned about the 2003 growing season, a continuation of dry 
            weather into March could propel December 2003 futures back to last 
            September's high, near $2.60." 
            Good's comments came as he reviewed 
            recent corn prices. The average cash price of corn in central 
            Illinois hit a marketing year (post-harvest) low of $2.22 on Jan. 
            14. Price weakness was associated with the USDA reports showing a 
            very slow rate of feed and residual use of corn during the first 
            quarter of the 2002-03 marketing year. The average spot cash price 
            increased to $2.335 on Feb. 7. The average central Illinois basis 
            has strengthened since mid-January but is still a little weaker than 
            during early January. December 2003 futures have also moved slightly 
            higher, returning to the highs of early January. 
            "The gradual recovery in corn prices 
            has been associated with a continuation of the high rate of domestic 
            processing use of corn, hopes for a higher rate of exports and early 
            concerns about dry weather impacting the 2003 crop," said Good. 
            "Domestic processing use of corn for ethanol production continues at 
            a record pace, and processing capacity is scheduled to expand. Many 
            believe that the USDA will increase the forecast of use for the 
            current marketing year." 
            Good noted that hopes for an improved 
            export pace are primarily based on indications that Chinese sales 
            will slow during the second half of the 2002-03 marketing year, 
            resulting in increased demand for U.S. corn. 
            Through the first 22 weeks of the 
            marketing year, U.S. corn exports have been disappointing, although 
            there are some differences among the various sources of export 
            estimates. The USDA's "Export Inspection" report shows cumulative 
            inspections of 631 million bushels as of Jan. 30, compared with 703 
            million on the same date last year (down 10 percent). The USDA's 
            "Export Sales" report showed cumulative exports on the same date at 
            667 million bushels, compared with 694 million on the same date last 
            year (down 4 percent). 
              
            
               [to top of second column in
this article] |  
      
       
            "The Census Bureau estimate of exports 
            from September 2002 through November 2002 showed shipments of 400 
            million bushels, down 11 percent from the same period last year but 
            32 million larger than indicated by the USDA's ‘Export Inspection’ 
            report and 20 million above that indicated by the USDA's ‘Export 
            Sales’ report," said Good. 
            Unshipped export sales as of Jan. 30, 
            which provide some perspective on potential future shipments, were 
            reported at 207 million bushels, compared with 313 million on the 
            same date last year. Compared with the export program of a year ago, 
            sales and shipments of U.S. corn are down sharply for Taiwan, South 
            Korea and Egypt. Large increases have been registered for Canada and 
            Mexico. For Canada, larger purchases of U.S. corn have been the 
            result of drought-reduced production. For Mexico, the increased 
            purchases of U.S. corn have been mostly offset by smaller purchases 
            of grain sorghum. 
            "The rate of U.S. corn exports will 
            have to increase substantially between now and the end of August to 
            reach the 1.85 billion bushels projected by the USDA," said Good. 
            "Using the figures from the ‘Export Sales’ report, shipments will 
            have to increase from an average of 30.7 million bushels per week 
            during the final 22 weeks of the year to 38.9 bushels during the 
            remaining 30 weeks. 
            "That is about the same magnitude of 
            increase experienced last year. It would be encouraging to see the 
            weekly export sales numbers increase." 
            In the larger picture, Good added, the 
            prospective size of the 2003 U.S. corn crop will be the most 
            important price factor over the next several months. Most analysts 
            appear to expect an increase in U.S. corn acreage in 2003. 
            "One private source has projected a 
            2.7-million-acre expansion, on top of the 3.3-million-acre increase 
            in 2002," said Good. "The projected increase would put U.S. corn 
            acreage at 81.7 million, the most since 1982 and 1.6 million above 
            the largest acreage since acreage reduction programs were eliminated 
            in 1996. "The 
            2.5-million-acre increase in winter wheat seedings, high prices for 
            spring wheat and higher cotton prices suggest that the increase in 
            corn acreage could be more modest. However, even with no increase in 
            area planted to corn, area harvested for grain in 2003 would be 
            about 2.7 million acres larger than harvested in 2002 if a favorable 
            growing season is experienced. It seems likely, then, that harvested 
            acreage of corn for grain could be up by 3.5 to 4.0 million in 2003. 
            The USDA will release a ‘Prospective Plantings’ report on March 31."  [University 
            of Illinois news release] | 
        
            | 
            The first workshop, "Color in the Garden," is scheduled from 1 to 3 
            p.m. on Feb. 26 at the local Extension office. Reservations are 
            needed by Feb. 21, and you may call 732-8289 to make your 
            reservation. There is no cost for the program. The second workshop is 
            "Environmentally Friendly Gardening," which is scheduled for March 
            10 at the Extension office. The workshop will be from 7 to 9 p.m. 
            Reservations are needed by March 6 and may be made by calling the 
            office. Pesticide 
            applicator clinic 
            The last Logan County clinic for private pesticide applicators is 
            scheduled for Thursday, Feb. 20, at the Extension office. The clinic 
            will begin at 8:30 a.m. with the training session. The Illinois 
            Department of Agriculture will give the exam at the conclusion of 
            the training session.   [to top of second column in
this article] |  
             
            Certification is needed for individuals purchasing and applying 
            restricted-use pesticides on ground that they own or operate. Most 
            of the rootworm insecticides and other pyrethroid insecticides are 
            restricted use, as are all atrazine herbicides. 
            Study guides are available at the office for $5 each. The guides are 
            an excellent way to do some studying at home prior to attending the 
            training session. Preregistration is 
            required for the clinic, as enrollment is limited. Reservations are 
            taken on a first-come, first-served basis. For producers who miss 
            this session, attendance at another county or testing in Springfield 
            will be required.  [John
Fulton] | 
        
            | 
            As the Southern Hemisphere crop takes 
            shape, marketing specialist 
            Darrel Good says the market will shift its focus to the stocks of 
            U.S. crops, which are expected to be adequate, but small, going into 
            the 2003 harvest season. The relatively small inventories mean that 
            the size of the 2003 crops will have very important price 
            implications. He says the dominant market factors will revolve 
            around soil moisture and crop acreage. 
            The National Weather Service 
            notes extensive dryness in many crop areas, including the Ohio 
            Valley and Great Lakes region. Darrel Good says a weakening El Nino 
            means a dry February and a wetter-than-normal March and April. But 
            Darrel says spring and summer moisture will have a greater impact on 
            crops than will current moisture levels. 
            Regarding acreage, 
            the USDA will report intentions on March 31, based on a March 1 
            survey. Darrel Good says a number of factors will influence cropland 
            acreage and the mix of that acreage by crop in 2003. These include 
            the extent of weather damage to winter wheat, relative prices of 
            spring-planted crops and spring weather conditions. 
            Until planting time, 
            July corn futures have found support at 
            $2.35. Darrel says the early January high just above $2.50 may be 
            difficult to penetrate prior to spring. Volatility is likely from 
            March forward, as spring and summer weather conditions unfold. The 
            soybean market remains inverted, with March futures supported at 
            $5.44 and July supported near $5.35, because of the high rate of 
            export sales. March beans have a strong $5.85 ceiling. 
            If corn prices seem a bit low, 
            (ending ratio of stocks to usage is 10 percent) Kansas State 
            marketing specialist Bill Tierney says they are well below the 
            average for the last 27 years. He contends market factors over the 
            last seven to eight years have had a depressing effect on corn 
            prices. But he says the steepness of the "price response" curve 
            implies that any significant improvement in fundamentals could 
            trigger a dramatic and large upward "correction" in prices. 
            To market corn, 
            Tierney recommends an options strategy 
            of the simultaneous purchase of a put option and the sale of an 
            out-of the-money call option. A $2.40 December put cost 18 cents per 
            bushel, while a $2.70 call cost 9 cents per bushel. For the net cost 
            of 9 cents (plus commission) a producer could put a floor under the 
            price of corn while leaving open the potential to capture an 
            additional 30 cents per bushel if the market rallies to $2.70. 
            Tierney warns you about a possible margin call and using crop 
            revenue coverage insurance; see
            
            www.agecon.ksu.edu/risk/current.pdf.[Click 
            here to download the Adobe Acrobat reader.]
   [to top of second column in
this article] | 
             
            To increase your revenue, 
            consider custom fieldwork for landowners or other farmers without a 
            full line of production equipment. The primary issue is what fee 
            should be charged. The Farmdoc website provides comprehensive 
            machinery operation costs; see
            
            http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/manage/machinery/field_operations.asp. Don't forget to add on 15 
            percent to 20 percent for your return to labor and management, 
            otherwise known as "profit."
 
            How does your operation compare 
            with other similar operations? Don't just compare your crops to your 
            neighbor's crops, but compare your farm business to other similar 
            farms throughout the state. You can do that with a new tool on the Farmdoc website; go to
            
            http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/finance/benchmarks.asp. (Use with Internet Explorer).
 
            The Farmdoc benchmarks 
            available so far are farm type (grain, swine, beef, dairy), 
            debt-to-asset level, tillable acres, total assets, net worth, value 
            of farm production, tenure level, farmer age, level of return on 
            farm assets, net farm income and (for hog farms) the value of the 
            farm. These comparison classifications are available for the past 10 
            years. 
            Will a threat to the food supply 
            originate on your farm? The Illinois Terrorism Task Force has 
            identified seven ways that might happen: human threats, biological, 
            chemical, nuclear or radiological, explosive, incendiary, and cyber. 
            And the group says it can respond to an alert within an hour. But 
            the question is: "Who and what will sound the alarm?" 
            A potential food terrorism alert 
            may be sounded in two ways. If somebody tries to introduce soybean 
            rust into the soybean production system, one of the first protectors 
            might be the producer who sees something happening in the fields, or 
            it could be through satellite remote sensing picking up something 
            odd going on in a field. The task force is just now in the 
            discussion stage of a network that would collect and distribute 
            data. 
            If you have a concentrated animal 
            feedlot, you'll want to 
            attend Extension's March 11 conference in Bloomington. Topics 
            include good neighbor policies, water runoff, federal assistance 
            funds, manure management and specie breakout sessions. Call (800) 
            345-6087 to preregister ($35) or send e-mail to Dr. Ted Funk at
            funkt@uiuc.edu for info. Details are 
            still uncertain, but 
            Congress is moving toward a disaster assistance bill for 
            agriculture, which would provide a payment equal to 42.25 percent of 
            2002 direct payments if a disaster threshold is met. Those levels 
            are still up for debate by the conference committee. The Senate 
            reconsidered a plan that would give money to all farmers, a 
            veritable public relations nightmare.  
            [Stu 
            Ellis, University of Illinois Extension,Macon County]
 | 
        
          | 
            Scholarship winners will be chosen 
            based on their commitment to agriculture as a future career, 
            academic performance, involvement in extracurricular activities, 
            financial need and work experience. The committee is particularly 
            interested in candidates who will return to the Logan County area to 
            pursue their careers. 
            Applications are available from the 
            Lincoln/Logan County Chamber of Commerce --  (217) 735-2385; 
            303 S. Kickapoo St., Lincoln, IL 62656 -- or at any high school in 
            Logan County. | Completed 
            applications are due to the Lincoln/Logan County Chamber office in 
            Lincoln by Friday, Feb. 28. Applications will be reviewed soon 
            afterward, and winners will be notified of their award. Winners will 
            be recognized at the Logan County Ag Day breakfast on Wednesday, 
            March 19. 
            [News release] 
            |