|
The statement "condemns" the April 5 "launch"
-- without specifying whether it was a missile or a satellite -- and demands that North Korea "not conduct further launches." Saying the United States was pleased by the council's action, Rice told reporters: "The U.S. view is that what likely was on top of that missile with ballistic missile technology was a failed satellite. I think most members of the council have come to the same conclusion." She added that the U.S. considered the statement's demand that North Korea "not conduct further launches" a key element. It means "launches that employ satellite or space-launch vehicles are prohibited," she said. The statement demands that Pyongyang must fully implement the 2006 resolution, which ordered the North to suspend all ballistic missile activities and "abandon all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs in a complete, verifiable and irreversible manner." In the statement, the council "agrees" to expand sanctions under the 2006 resolution, which ordered a financial freeze on assets belonging to companies and groups tied to North Korean programs for nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles and other weapons of mass destruction and banned the sale of specific goods used in those programs. Since its adoption, no North Korean companies or organizations have been put on the list, diplomats said. The statement says the Security Council committee monitoring sanctions against North Korea is to report by April 24 on companies, equipment and technologies that should be listed. If the committee fails to act, the council itself will then come up with a list by April 30, the statement says. The United States and Japan said they planned to submit names for the list. The breakthrough in the U.N. response to the rocket launch came after Japan on Saturday dropped its demand that the council adopt a resolution, which is the strongest action the body can take. Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin called the statement "a measured response" and said "most of the credit" for achieving consensus "must go to the U.S. and China." China opposed a resolution with new sanctions because it wanted the council's reaction "to be cautious and proportionate," Chinese Ambassador Zhang Yesui said. "What is important is for all the parties concerned to keep calm and restraint and work together for maintaining peace and stability in northeast Asia," he said.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor