|
But the district is asking an appellate court to throw out the injunction, or at least put it on hold until it weighs the district's claims that the lower court misinterpreted the statute. "Our position is that the dog is not necessary for any educational purpose and that in bringing in the dog we actually are putting many other students at health risk," Christi Flaherty, an attorney for Carter's district, Columbia Community Schools Unit 4, said Tuesday. Carter's mother, Melissa Kalbfleisch, said the school's position is hard to swallow. "It's just amazing to me that they're going to fight this," she said. "Anybody can read the law and see how clear it is. The money we're wasting on this could be going to Carter's benefit, school and getting him more therapy."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor