|
Instead, Tehran signaled it wanted to hold on to most of its enriched uranium and either buy fuel abroad instead, or possibly enrich what it had inside the country to the higher level needed for the Tehran reactor. A third possibility floated by Iranian officials was that the country would send out a small amount and wait for that to be returned as research reactor fuel before sending out the next small amount. But those options were voiced either by parliamentarians or unnamed officials. Soltanieh's comments appeared to be the first concrete statement of what Iran wanted. None of these options are acceptable to the West. Tehran says it is enriching only to make fuel for a future network of nuclear reactors, but the West fears Tehran's "breakout capacity"
-- the ability to reconfigure its enrichment operation and turn its low-enriched material into fissile, weapons grade uranium. If Iran agreed to ship out 70 percent of its enriched stockpile, as demanded by the West, it would no longer have enough to turn into nuclear warhead material
-- at least not for the year or so that it would need to replenish its stockpile. The plan drawn up by IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei plan would commit Iran to turn over more than 2,600 pounds (1,200 kilograms) of low-enriched uranium
-- more than the commonly accepted amount needed to produce weapons-grade material.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor