The pay package given to Freddie Mac's new chief financial officer should have sent a message from Washington to corporate America about how executive compensation standards must change. Instead, it did just the opposite.
The government-controlled mortgage finance company is giving CFO Ross Kari compensation worth as much as $5.5 million. That includes an almost $2 million cash signing bonus and a generous salary that could top $2.3 million.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Freddie Mac, approved the pay package. A spokeswoman pointed to a statement that justified the agency's approval of the pay, which was done in part because the amount was comparable to what others in the financial services industry make.
That way of thinking is exactly what helped feed the surge in executive pay over the last decade. Everyone wants to make at least as much, or more, than their peers.
Freddie Mac is not just another company. It's alive today, and nearly 80 percent owned by the government, only because almost $51 billion in taxpayer funds were pumped into it over the last year. More bailout money also may be needed in the quarters ahead as losses from its troubled mortgages mount.
Outside pay experts are outraged. "We are in a period when this shouldn't be acceptable," said Paul Hodgson, a senior research associate at The Corporate Library, an independent corporate governance research firm. "Even if pay is competitive to the market, that doesn't make it OK today."
Lawmakers, regulators and corporate directors have spent the last year talking about how to "fix" executive pay following the outcry over what many Americans deem as excessive compensation.
Banks have come under fire for paying top executives big bonuses, which many see as encouraging excessive risk-taking and a focus on short-term results. The Obama administration also has proposed giving shareholders of all public companies a nonbinding vote on compensation.
Financial companies that receive bailout funds under the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, are bound by rules on compensation. So long as they hold the government money, they can't pay cash bonuses to top executives, retention awards to top managers or stock compensation subject to performance-based vesting.
Freddie Mac doesn't have to follow those restrictions because its government aid has come from outside TARP.
Instead, Freddie Mac and its sibling, Fannie Mae, operate under "conservatorship" of the U.S. government after being crippled by losses last year. That was done because of the vital role both companies play in the mortgage market by purchasing loans from lenders and selling them to investors. Together, they own or guarantee about half of all U.S home mortgages.
The McLean, Va.-based Freddie Mac has been without a permanent CFO for more than a year, when its two top executives stepped down as part of the government takeover in early September 2008. Acting CFO David Kellermann committed suicide in April.
Given the close government control over Freddie Mac, the pay package for its new CFO could have been held up as an example of reasonable compensation. Instead, his pay package doesn't reflect much restraint.
When Kari joins Freddie Mac on Oct. 12, he will receive a base salary of $675,000 and is entitled to an additional $1.66 million in cash for the year. The company said Kari will be paid in installments, but did not specify the timing of those payments in a Sept. 24 securities filing. The company declined to comment beyond the filing.