Wednesday, December 15, 2010
 
sponsored by

Delinquent sewer bills still a tough issue at council

Send a link to a friend

[December 15, 2010]  For well over a year the Lincoln City Council has struggled with finding a means to collect delinquent sewer bills. These delinquencies are serious business as the dollar amount of uncollected bills consistently averages over $150,000, not including the amounts that go delinquent for the local correctional facilities

InsuranceCurrently the only recourse the city has on overdue sewer accounts is to file liens against the real property. However, that has little effect on the property owner until he or she reaches a point of selling the property.

The most recent attempt to collect these bills involved publicly listing names and addresses, along with dollars owed, in local media sources, including a red button on the front page of the Lincoln Daily News.

The idea behind advertising the names was to embarrass some property owners into paying their bill to get their name off the list. At first there was some positive response to this, but now it appears that those left on the list don't care if they are known to the public.

Tuesday evening at the city's committee-of-the-whole council meeting, Alderman Buzz Busby, who chairs the city sewer committee, said he had submitted a contract from Illinois American Water to city attorney Bill Bates, council members and Mayor Keith Snyder two weeks ago.

Exterminator

The contract would afford the city the opportunity to order water shut-offs to residences where the sewer bill is past due.

Busby said Bates was taking exception to a clause in the contract that would hold the water company completely harmless for the consequences of the water shut-off or any incidents that occurred during the shut-off process, with the exception of cases of "gross negligence."

Busby said the city had approved similar stipulations in other contracts in the past, but Bates argued that they have done no such thing.

"I don't know that we have ever passed a contract indemnifying for negligence," Bates said.

When asked by Alderman David Wilmert to give a definition of "negligence" and "gross negligence," Bates said that was part of the problem. There is no clear legal definition or distinction between the two, and such cases are usually decided by a court of law.

Alderwoman Marty Neitzel questioned why the city should agree to a liability that would be charged to city insurance. She wondered if Illinois American didn't have insurance for such problems.

Bates said that too was a problem because the city insurance coverage will not cover what they refer to as "contracted liability."

"It wouldn't be on the insurance," he said, "it would be on us."

Snyder said he and Bates had discussions with the attorney for Illinois American and they are not going to budge on this issue.

He noted there had been other issues in the contract that the water company attorney had amended for the city, but on this issue the general idea was that Illinois American is offering a service for which there is no profit involved for them, and therefore they will take no responsibility.

Snyder said, "I told her this is not a contract that we can recommend to the city and she just said ‘fine.'"

Wilmert asked if the city could buy insurance that would cover contracted liability and was told that was unknown at this time but could be investigated.

[to top of second column]

The discussion then moved to the effect of doing water shut-offs to area residents. Neitzel asked if there were exceptions or problems that might arise from shutting off homes with small children.

Bates said the state of Illinois regulates shut-offs and that the city will have to follow the law in ordering this type of action.

Alderman Tom O'Donohue also commented on property, saying there would be instances where a tenant was paying the water bill, the landlord not paying the sewer, and yet it would be the tenant who suffered.

Neitzel responded simply by saying, "That is not good."

It also came up that once the water is shut off, the residence becomes a zoning and safety issue for the city, which would then add a greater burden to the work of the safety officer, John Lebegue.

Busby said the contract with Illinois American included a letter that would be issued to the tenant and the landlord, letting them both know what was about to happen.

Alderwoman Stacy Bacon said she couldn't get behind this kind of action. She wondered if the city could hire a collection agency to deal with this.

Busby said the agency would charge approximately 30 percent of the amount collected and that only about 30 percent of the delinquent accounts would be collectible in that fashion.

Busby said there are other cities in the region that are using this contract effectively, and Bacon said she'd like to know what they are doing to cover themselves on the liability issues.

Alderwoman Melody Anderson said she'd also like to hear from those cities about how they handle the landlord-tenant situation.

Anderson also wondered if the city should rethink their billings, perhaps putting the responsibility on the tenant.

Bates said that could also be a problem for the city because tenants are more mobile. They could move, leaving bills unpaid, and then there would be a new issue.

There were also comments on whether or not landlords would reduce rental rates accordingly if they didn't have to pay the sewer bills.

In the end, the group decided they wanted to look into insurance for contracted liability, wanted a list of local cities that are using this contract and an opportunity to talk to those cities about how they are handling the various situations discussed.

[By NILA SMITH]

Past related articles

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching and Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law and Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health and Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor