|
The shout came as Rep. Bart Stupak, an anti-abortion Democrat deemed crucial to the bill's passage, was countering the arguments of Republican abortion foes, who said President Barack Obama's executive order pledging no federal funding for abortions was insufficient. On Monday, Neugebauer said his remark hadn't been directed at Stupak himself
-- rather, he said, the "baby killer" was the agreement between Obama and anti-abortion Democrats led by Stupak. True or not, one person who wasn't shocked by the outburst -- historically speaking, at least
-- was Kathleen Hall Jamieson, an expert on political communication who conducted a study of incivility in the House of Representatives from the 1940s through the mid-1990s. She found that the worst incivility always occurs when there is a very close vote, on a very consequential matter. She also found it occurs when there's a strong constituency that feels deeply about an issue and has support on the floor. "Abortion, in the context of the health care debate, obviously fits all those criteria," says Jamieson, a professor at the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.
"The point is, it's not a case of incivility constantly getting worse," says Jamieson. "We have moments where it happens. It's not common, but it happens." When looking with her co-authors at the late 1940s, when the House Un-American Activities Committee was being formed, "We had things that were much worse than last night." In fact, Jamieson notes, incivility is one reason that use of the terms "gentleman" and "gentlelady" were put in place: "So that if you have an impulse to say something uncivil, it will sound really inappropriate in that context." Though incivility in our political discourse may be partially a cyclical phenomenon, dependent on major political or social change, one analyst also sees a general coarsening of our political culture, as well as a much more ideological bent. "I was on my way to work this morning and I saw an amazing bumper sticker," says Bruce Schulman, a historian at Boston University. It directed a vulgar curse word at Obama. "It's hard for me to believe that we would have seen that a few decades ago," says Schulman. "Even with Richard Nixon, who was so hated by many." Still, Schulman says, it's clear that with the Internet, social media and other platforms, many with extreme views now merely have a megaphone they didn't have years ago. So, for example, a number of blogs Monday showed a poster held by opponents of the bill, in which a gun is pictured, with the words: "Warning, if Brown can't stop it a Browning can." The reference was to newly elected Republican Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts. "The rawest, most unfiltered comments now become part of the political discourse," Schulman says.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor