|
Kagan would be the fifth solicitor general to move to the high court, but her ascent from one job to the other would be the fastest, outstripping even her barrier-shattering onetime boss, Marshall. President Bill Clinton nominated her to the federal appeals court in Washington in 1999, but the Republican-controlled Senate never acted on the nomination. Liberal interest groups were not thrilled when Kagan publicly supported a couple of President George W. Bush's appeals court nominees, but criticism of Kagan from the left could be blunted in part because Obama could have additional high court vacancies to fill. Social conservatives, on the other hand, already have sought to paint her as "disturbingly out of the mainstream" on some issues, including her opposition to the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy for gay soldiers. Kagan argued strenuously against the policy, calling it "just flat out wrong." She was among law school deans who filed a brief in a Supreme Court case over a federal law that withholds government money from colleges that ban the military from recruiting on campus because of objections to the Pentagon's policy on gays. The Supreme Court upheld the law unanimously. Last year, the Senate confirmed Kagan by a vote of 61-31, with only 7 Republicans supporting her. The relatively large number of votes against her cheered some conservative activists, although the margin suggested Kagan would again prevail in a confirmation vote for the Supreme Court. One academic paper she wrote in the 1990s could be used against her in the confirmation process. Kagan lamented the lack of "seriousness and substance" in confirmation hearings for Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. "When the Senate ceases to engage nominees in meaningful discussion of legal issues, the confirmation process takes on an air of vacuity and farce," she wrote in the University of Chicago Law Review in 1995. Asked about this by senators when her nomination as solicitor general was pending, Kagan replied that she is "less convinced than I was in 1995 that substantive discussions of legal issues and views, in the context of nomination hearings, provide the great public benefits I suggested."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor