|
Over nine years in the study, 85 women were sent for the exams, and eight ultimately had exploratory surgery to see if they had cancer. (Unlike many other forms of cancer, doctors can't do a biopsy for ovarian cancer without an operation).
Five of the eight women who had operations turned out to have cancer: Three had aggressive tumors, and two had cancer that had not yet become invasive. The other three had benign tumors. Two noninvasive cancers were missed by screening.
"We only needed to do three surgeries to pick up one case of invasive cancer," Lu said.
"That sounds a lot more acceptable" than the 10 surgeries needed to detect one case that a previous study found when using the blood test by itself, said Dr. Otis Brawley, the Cancer Society's chief medical officer.
"This may very well be getting closer to something useful," Brawley said of the new screening approach.
The real test, though, is whether it saves lives -- what the study of 200,000 women in the United Kingdom will show.
Dianne Klefstad, 61, of Houston, is betting it will. She took part in the U.S. study, and her tumor was found after her fourth blood test.
When doctors said she had cancer, "I couldn't believe it. I had no symptoms," she said. The screening "saved my life, I think."
___
On the Net:
Cancer screening: http://ovariancancer.jhmi.edu/ca125qa.cfm
Cancer Society:
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/SPC/
content/SPC_1_ovarian_Q_A_Saslow.asp
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor