|
The law was intended for situations in which a diplomatic mission was being used for serious wrongdoing such as terrorism. Sheltering Assange hardly compares. Former government lawyer Carl Gardner says a court would likely rule that using the law against Assange would be inconsistent with the intent of the law. "I don't see it as a realistic prospect that the government would do a dash for the airport with him," he said. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? Ecuador says it will announce Thursday whether to grant Assange asylum. But the standoff is likely to continue. Britain says it has a legal duty to extradite the 41-year-old Australian to Sweden, regardless of what Ecuador decides. If he emerges from the embassy, he will be arrested, which seemingly makes it impossible for him to get to an airport and travel to Ecuador. Britain says it wants to find a diplomatic solution, but with Ecuador enraged, that looks farther off than ever.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor