|
Abramovich claims that Berezovsky was not his mentor and never owned the stakes
-- in fact, he argued that Berezovsky only had a political role in creating Sibneft and never "contributed a single cent" to acquiring or building up the company. The Chelsea owner said he had already paid more than $2.5 billion to Berezovsky for his services as his "political godfather"
-- a protector whose political influence helped him do business in Russia -- and reluctantly funded Berezovsky's extravagant lifestyle of yachts and vacation homes because he feared retaliation. The judge concluded that the deal between Abramovich and Berezovsky was that, in return for substantial cash payments to Berezovsky, Abramovich and Sibneft would enjoy Berezovsky's political patronage and influence, "which was indispensable to the construction of any major business in the conditions of the 1990s." Gloster wrote that she "could not excuse the extent of Mr. Berezovsky's deviations from his previous case as presented in his pleadings and witness statements. His `I blame my lawyers" excuse was not convincing. " "Mr. Berezovsky's evidence frequently could not be relied upon, where it differed from that of Mr. Abramovich, or other witnesses. I regret to say that," she added.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor