|
Margaret Davidson, director of the Coastal Services Center for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Charleston, S.C., said the implications of the new research are "huge when you think about it." "Somewhere between Maryland and Massachusetts, you've got some bodaciously expensive property at risk,"
she said. Sea level projections matter in coastal states because flood maps based on those predictions can result in restrictions on property development and affect flood insurance rates. Those estimates became an issue in North Carolina recently when the Legislature proposed using historic figures to calculate future sea levels, rejecting higher rates from a state panel of experts. The USGS study suggests an even higher level than the panel's estimate for 2100. The North Carolina proposal used data from University of Florida professor Robert Dean, who had found no regional differences in sea level rise. Dean said he can't argue with the results from Sallenger's study showing accelerating sea level rise in the region, but he said it's more likely to be from natural cycles. Sallenger said there is no evidence to support that claim. ___ Online: Nature Climate Change:
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/
[Associated
Press;
Associated Press writers Allen Reed in Raleigh, N.C., and Jeff Barnard in Grants Pass, Ore., contributed to this report.
Seth Borenstein can be followed at http://twitter.com/borenbears.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor