Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said that
this group of people — estimated by the administration to be fewer
than 500,000 in number — will be allowed to claim a "hardship
exemption" from the requirement in the 2010 Affordable Care Act to
buy insurance.
Armed with the exemption, they then have the option to buy
"catastrophic" insurance plans — cheaper insurance with a minimal
coverage level that, under the law, is normally available only to
people under the age of 30.
"This is a common-sense clarification of the law," said Joanne
Peters, a spokeswoman for Sebelius. "For the limited number of
consumers whose plans have been canceled and are seeking coverage,
this is one more option."
In the law, there are 14 categories of "hardships" that can be used
to get an exemption from the mandate to buy insurance, such as a
recent eviction or bankruptcy.
But this is the first exemption prompted by the administration's
botched rollout of the law, and comes after months of insistence
that there would be no delays in implementing the individual
mandate.
The rocky rollout of President Barack Obama's signature policy
achievement has been embarrassing and politically damaging, helping
push Obama's approval ratings to the lowest point of his presidency.
Part of the backlash came when millions of people received policy
cancellation notices, forcing Obama to apologize for a promise he
made that people who liked their insurance policies could keep them
under the Affordable Care Act reforms.
The latest twist comes just days before a December 23 deadline for
arranging insurance coverage to begin on January 1. In effect, it
will provide the administration and Democrats in Congress some
political cover, because people won't be able to claim they don't
have insurance purely because their policy was canceled and
alternatives are too expensive.
The change was suggested by a group of Democratic senators, some of
whom face difficult reelection campaigns in 2014.
But the exemption comes after a series of other delays in enforcing
or implementing various parts of Obamacare, and instantly sparked
more political criticism that the government is unevenly and
unfairly applying the law.
Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican who is vice-chairman of the
House Energy and Commerce Committee, said in a statement that the
change was a "holiday surprise" that showed the White House was "in
full panic mode" ahead of the deadline.
"Rather than more White House delays, waivers and exemptions, the
administration should provide all Americans relief from its failed
law," Blackburn said.
The head of the lobby group for insurance companies also panned the
change.
"This latest rule change could cause significant instability in the
marketplace and lead to further confusion and disruption for
consumers," said Karen Ignagni, president of America's Health
Insurance Plans.
MORE "BUMPS IN THE ROAD" AHEAD
Millions of Americans don't have health insurance, a gap Obamacare
aimed to fix. But enrollment got off to a painfully slow start
because of the poorly designed HealthCare.gov website used to shop
for plans.
Only 365,000 people had signed up by the end of November, when the
site finally began to work well for most people.
[to top of second column] |
Officials said there has been a surge in enrollments in December.
They said more than 70 percent are people who were stymied by the
technical problems earlier on, but they declined to release new
enrollment data.
"Folks have come back, and they're coming back in droves," one of
the officials told reporters.
The administration is also girding for the next phase of the
rollout, when they anticipate newly insured Americans could
encounter problems with coverage as they seek care at pharmacies and
doctors' offices.
The insurance, required by law, is sold by private companies. To
prepare for gaps, officials said they have trained call center staff
to connect consumers with their providers.
"This is a big transition that we are going through," one of the
officials said. "There will be bumps in the road."
COUNTER-NARRATIVE
The White House also concluded on Thursday a three-week barrage of
events designed to trumpet good news it feels has been lost amid
stories about the botched rollout.
It released a state-by-state report showing how many Americans have
already gained new protections from reforms, such as the numbers now
prevented from being denied coverage because of pre-existing medical
conditions.
The information provides a "counter-narrative" for congressional
Democrats, who are anxious a backlash against the law could hurt
them in 2014 elections, said Tevi Troy, a White House aide and
former Deputy Health and Human Services Secretary in the George W.
Bush administration.
But the White House also is trying to burnish Obama's legacy
achievement, he said. "I think it's about changing the damaging
story about Obamacare," Troy said.
Republicans have repeatedly voted to repeal the law, shutting down
the government for 16 days in October over the issue. They have said
they will continue to push for changes.
"The fact is, premiums are going up, millions of people are losing
the plans they had, and access to doctors and hospitals is being
restricted as a result of Obamacare," said Don Stewart, deputy chief
of staff to Mitch McConnell, the top Republican in the Senate.
But on a conference call organized by the White House on Thursday,
Democratic congressman Joaquin Castro from Texas told reporters he
is not worried the law will hurt him in 2014.
"I believe that by November 2014, the reality will overtake the
propaganda," Castro said, explaining he thinks consumers will
appreciate the "tangible benefits" of the law and will forgive the
"glitches" in the rollout.
(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell;
editing by Ken Wills)
[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|