Judge
in Colorado cinema massacre case won't delay trial again
Send a link to a friend
[December 11, 2014]
By Keith Coffman and Daniel Wallis
DENVER (Reuters) - A judge overseeing the
Colorado movie theater massacre case said on Wednesday he will not delay
the trial of gunman James Holmes again, rejecting a request by the
defense for more time to study the results of a second court-ordered
sanity exam.
|
Jury selection in the trial of Holmes, 26, is due to start next
month, and Arapahoe County District Court Judge Carlos Samour has
previously told lawyers for both sides to be ready to present their
opening statements in late May or early June.
Holmes is charged with multiple counts of first-degree murder and
attempted murder for opening fire inside a Denver-area theater in
July 2012 at a midnight screening of the Batman film, "The Dark
Knight Rises," killing 12 and wounding dozens.
His lawyers concede he was the sole gunman, but argue that the
former neuroscience graduate student was suffering from a psychotic
episode at the time. Prosecutors have said they will seek the death
penalty if he is convicted.
Defense lawyers asked last week for the trial to be delayed to give
them more time to study the results of Holmes' second sanity exam,
which they said run to nearly 5,000 pages of documents and more than
20 hours of video.
On Monday, they told the judge their team had also been hit by two
medical emergencies.
The prosecution had opposed any further delay to the trial.
In his ruling on Wednesday, Samour said the defense will have had
ample time to study the results of the second exam by the time trial
begins, and he said they had failed to identify specific materials
their experts were unable to view.
"If such vague allegations were sufficient, every criminal defendant
could be entitled to a postponement of his trial," the judge wrote.
[to top of second column] |
Holmes' trial has already been delayed several times, mostly because
of the two mental examinations the California native was ordered to
undergo after invoking the insanity defense.
While Samour said he sympathized with the defense and the "tragic
events" of their medical emergencies, he said that likewise they
were not grounds to delay a case that has been pending for two and a
half years.
The judge also said a majority of victims polled oppose any further
holdups.
"Simply put, it is time for this case to proceed to trial," Samour
wrote.
(Reporting by Keith Coffman and Daniel Wallis; Editing by Sandra
Maler)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|