| 
			
			 Citing pollution’s heavy toll on cardiovascular health, the panel 
			urges people to take steps to protect themselves from breathing 
			heavy traffic fumes or industrial air pollution whenever possible, 
			and public officials to pass laws to reduce air pollution. 
 “Cardiovascular disease is a huge global problem, causing immense 
			suffering and premature death, as well as placing severe strain on 
			national healthcare budgets and/or family finances,” said Dr. Robert 
			Storey, a professor of cardiology at the University of Sheffield in 
			the UK and senior author of the new position paper.
 
 Air pollution causes more than 3 million deaths worldwide each year 
			and causes 3.1 percent of all cases of disability, Storey and his 
			coauthors write in the European Heart Journal.
 
 Air pollution is also ninth most important on a list of modifiable 
			heart-disease risk factors - ranking above low physical activity, 
			high-salt diet, high cholesterol and drug use, the authors point 
			out.
 
 Although gaseous air pollutants can be dangerous too, Storey said, 
			airborne particles are the biggest contributor to cardiovascular 
			disease because they cause inflammation of the lungs and enter the 
			circulation, inflaming blood vessels, provoking clots and causing 
			heart rhythm disturbances.
 
			
			 
			  
			Particulate matter includes coarse particles from road dust, 
			construction work and industrial emissions and fine particles from 
			traffic, power plants and industrial and residential burning of oil, 
			coal or wood for heating.
 The bulk of particulate air pollution is made up of these fine 
			particles, known as PM2.5, that are less than 2.5 micrometers - 
			about one fifth the size of visible dust.
 
 The World Health Organization sets the safe outdoor exposure limit 
			for PM2.5 at an average of 25 micrograms, or 25 millionths of a 
			gram, per cubic meter of air over a 24-hour period, or average 
			annual levels of 10 micrograms per cubic meter. In 2013, the U.S. 
			Environmental Protection Agency lowered the 24-hour exposure limit 
			to an average of 12 micrograms.
 
 European studies have found that PM2.5 levels are often markedly 
			higher near heavy traffic zones compared to elsewhere in the same 
			city, and that the levels can more than double during rush hours, 
			according to the position statement.
 
 Some of the authors’ advice for people to protect themselves is as 
			simple as walking, cycling and using public transportation instead 
			of driving cars, and exercising in parks or gardens, rather than 
			near busy roads.
 
 And everyone should avoid being outside when pollution is highest, 
			though this is especially important for infants, elderly and people 
			with heart problems, the authors say.
 
 People who live in heavily polluted areas should also consider 
			ventilation systems with filtration in their homes, since a large 
			portion of outdoor pollution can penetrate buildings.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			The use of fossil fuels for heating and energy should also be 
			decreased, according to the statement.
 “Many countries have made good progress towards reducing risk 
			factors such as smoking, high cholesterol and high blood pressure 
			but much less effort has been extended on reducing exposure to air 
			pollution,” Storey said in an email to Reuters Health.
 
			Studies have shown even short-term exposure to high PM2.5 levels 
			increases deaths from heart disease and respiratory disease, and 
			that people living in places with high PM2.5 have an 11 percent 
			greater risk of dying from heart attacks, strokes and heart failure 
			than those who live in cleaner areas.
 Dr. Robert Brook, a cardiologist at the University of Michigan 
			Health System and another author of the policy statement, said many 
			people don’t realize the dangerous effects of air pollution on the 
			heart.
 
 “While most people can readily observe and believe that air 
			pollution may cause lung diseases, it is in fact cardiovascular 
			diseases that are the largest adverse health effect of fine 
			particulate matter exposure,” Brook said in an email.
 
			Dr. Alan Abelsohn of the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the 
			University of Toronto in Canada, called the statement an important 
			reminder. Too few cardiologists and primary care doctors advise 
			their patients of pollution’s risks, he said.
 “It’s a very important and neglected area of prevention,” he said.
 
 Abelsohn, who was not involved in the position statement, noted that 
			national-level guidelines on allowable amounts of pollution can only 
			do so much. He said individuals should always pay attention to the 
			local Air Quality Index, which rates the level of air pollution 
			according to health risk, and reduce their exposure accordingly.
 
 Brook said that while the U.S. has made great strides reducing air 
			pollution since the 1970s or even 2000, the efforts should continue.
 
			
			 
			“What we should not do is lessen our regulations and pose a threat 
			to the cardiovascular health of the nation in the name of expediency 
			or supposed economic growth or stimulus,” Brook said.
 SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1zt1Iw6 European Heart Journal, online 
			December 9, 2014.
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |