| 
			 For the past four decades, Gardner has outmaneuvered states 
			including Florida and Nevada to protect the front-runner spot 
			mandated by New Hampshire law - and it has not always been easy. The 
			state has steadily moved forward its primary, originally held in 
			March. It shoe-horned the past two contests into January. 
 Ask Gardner when the 2016 primary, which marks the 100th anniversary 
			of the event, will be held and he smiles, careful not to limit his 
			options.
 
 "I have never set the date and then changed it," said Gardner, 66. 
			"I wait until I feel it's safe to do it and then I do it."
 
 But the early January primaries of 2008 and 2012 were unpopular with 
			Democratic and Republican officials, who worried that Americans were 
			paying more attention to holiday parties than to candidates 
			barnstorming New Hampshire and Iowa, whose citizens kick off 
			nominating season with caucuses.
 
 
			
			 
			This time around, observers said, it is unlikely that former 
			Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or former Florida Governor Jeb 
			Bush will be showing up at diners in Manchester or town meetings in 
			the White Mountains between Christmas and New Year's next year.
 
 "I suspect that this time will be different, that we won't have the 
			creep that we've had," said Neil Levesque, executive director of the 
			New Hampshire Institute of Politics.
 
 The Republican National Committee has established rules penalizing 
			states that hold votes ahead of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina 
			or Nevada, he noted.
 
 RETAIL POLITICS
 
 Regardless of when the primary is held, White House hopefuls already 
			are making the rounds in New Hampshire, where voters expect to speak 
			to candidates in person before they vote.
 
 Most make multiple visits to the state before arriving at Gardner's 
			state house office, where candidates from former President George W. 
			Bush to Clinton have sat down at a wooden desk and filled out the 
			paperwork to get on New Hampshire's primary ballot.
 
 Several voters said they were looking forward to the flood of 
			candidates.
 
 "I enjoy it and you get to know much more about them than you would 
			just watching TV and reading the papers," Nancy LeBlanc, a 
			77-year-old retiree, said over breakfast at Chez Vachon, a 
			Manchester diner popular with barnstorming candidates.
 
 The state's political leaders contend that voters like LeBlanc play 
			a valuable role in the U.S. political process by allowing 
			little-known names to gain momentum.
 
 In recent decades, Republican Arizona Senator John McCain, and 
			Democratic former Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter both used strong 
			showings in New Hampshire to snag their parties' nominations after 
			lackluster early starts.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
			The primary is all the more valuable as television ads play an 
			ever-greater role in later stages of campaigns.
 "A candidate that comes in with $20 million in the bank already has 
			a lead on one who does not," said Jennifer Horn, chairman of the 
			state's Republican Party. "A state like New Hampshire allows those 
			other candidates a fair chance."
 
 Outside the state, some see New Hampshire's position as little more 
			than a quirk of history and doubt that its voters are more astute 
			than those in any other state.
 
 "Why should it always be Iowa and New Hampshire? There are plenty of 
			states with two or three electoral votes that could kick off the 
			process," said Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia 
			Center for Politics.
 
 "But it's not going to change," he said.
 
 Regardless of how unique New Hampshire's voters are, observers 
			agreed that Gardner, who has held his position since 1976, has stood 
			out for his ability to uphold the New Hampshire law that requires 
			its primary to be the first by at least a week.
 
 "There is no such thing as pressuring Bill Gardner and woe to the 
			person who tries," said Ray Buckley, chairman of the state's 
			Democratic Party. "Bill is going to do what he thinks is best for 
			the primary and that's it."
 
 Gardner, who served briefly in the state legislature before taking 
			on his current role, said he has no intention of allowing New 
			Hampshire's position to slip.
 
 
			 
			"As long as the people of the state have the will to keep this, they 
			will keep this," Gardner said. "There are not a whole lot of 
			political traditions in this country that are lasting. This is one."
 
 (Reporting by Scott Malone)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |