The recommendation by the American College of Physicians (ACP) is
separate from guidelines regarding Pap smears. It also doesn’t apply
to women who have symptoms such as abnormal bleeding or pain or who
are pregnant.
Researchers found a lack of evidence to suggest routine pelvic exams
save lives or improve health in the long run. But they can cause
pain, discomfort and fear.
“In the absence of demonstrated benefit and in the presence of
demonstrated harm, the equation just goes on the side of not doing
something,” Dr. Linda Humphrey said.
Humphrey is a co-author of the new guideline and a member of ACP’s
Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. She is also associate chief
of medicine at the Portland VA Medical Center in Oregon.
Pelvic exams are typically done to look for any abnormalities in the
vagina and surrounding organs. Doctors feel a woman’s stomach to
check the internal organs, examine exposed parts of the reproductive
system and use a device called a speculum to check internal areas of
the vagina.
About 63 million pelvic exams were done in the U.S. in 2010,
according to an editorial accompanying the new guideline, which is
published in ACP’s Annals of Internal Medicine.
Humphrey told Reuters Health the group was prompted to look at
pelvic exams because they are closely linked to cervical cancer
screenings. Recently other medical organizations and task forces
have suggested screening certain women for cervical cancer every few
years instead of annually, but they did not address pelvic exams,
she said.
“The thinking behind it was we need to understand the data on this
part of the exam now that the cervical cancer guidelines have
changed,” Humphrey said.
A review of past studies compiled for the ACP and published in the
same journal did not find evidence to support routine pelvic exams
in asymptomatic women.
What’s more, there is some evidence to suggest that the exams may
cause pain, discomfort, fear, anxiety or embarrassment in about a
third of women, according to the review, which was led by Dr. Hanna
Bloomfield from the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
“There was some concern that the fear of the exam would cause women
to not come in and not seek care when they need it,” Humphrey said,
adding that pelvic exams may also lead to unnecessary care if a
doctor erroneously suspects a problem.
In a statement emailed to Reuters Health, the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) said it stands by its
guidelines, which complement those from the ACP.
[to top of second column] |
For low-risk women without symptoms, ACOG recommends “the decision
about whether to perform a pelvic examination be a shared decision
between health care provider and patient, based on her own
individual needs, requests and preferences.”
But ACOG also said it believes in the clinical value of pelvic
exams, because doctors can detect issues such as incontinence and
sexual dysfunction.
“Pelvic examinations also allow gynecologists to explain a patient’s
anatomy, reassure her of normalcy and answer her specific questions,
thus establishing open communication between patient and physician,”
the statement added.
In the linked editorial, Drs. George Sawaya and Vanessa Jacoby from
the University of California, San Francisco write that ACP’s
announcement should prompt those who recommend routine pelvic exams
to demonstrate the screening does more good than harm.
“Remember there are two sides to any screening claim,” Sawaya told
Reuters Health. “They have to make a claim that the net benefit is
worth it.”
He added that it’s reasonable for women to discuss pelvic exams with
their doctor at this point. The talk should touch on what they hope
to achieve by having the exam done and whether there are any
downsides.
“I think it’s totally reasonable for women to opt out of the exam,”
Sawaya said. “If they do opt out, they should not be denied any
other services like contraception or anything like that.”
He also said it’s important for women to know the ACP recommendation
only applies to women without symptoms. “Certainly if patients have
symptoms they should talk with their doctor and if it’s warranted an
examination should be performed,” he added.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/SQRXAa
Annals of Internal Medicine, online June 30, 2014.
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |