| 
             As digital life increasingly moves to the world of smartphones and 
			tablets, some disabled people with visual, hearing and other 
			impairments are feeling more left out than ever. 
 As baby boomers retire and age, the number of people needing help is 
			multiplying. Many disabled advocates believe federal law requires 
			that apps be accessible, but courts have not ruled on the issue. Few 
			disabled want to risk alienating Apple, considered a friend, by 
			fighting it.
 
 Mobile apps that work well can transform a blind person's life, 
			reading email on the go or speaking directions to a new restaurant. 
			Some young blind people no longer feel the need to learn Braille to 
			read with their fingers, when Siri and other computer voices can do 
			the reading instead. Captions on videos and special hearing aids 
			bring hearing impaired into the digital fold.
 
 But when apps don't work, life can grind to a stop. Jonathan Lyens, 
			a San Francisco city employee, who is legally blind, has a hard time 
			browsing jobs on professional networking site LinkedIn.
 
			"The app is insane. Buttons aren't labeled. It's difficult to 
			navigate," said Lyens. When it comes to social media apps, new 
			problems arise with every release, he said. "I get nervous every 
			time I hit the update button."
 LinkedIn has hired an accessibility chief, Jennison Asuncion, who 
			himself is blind, and says it is working to improve the app.
 
 
            
			 
			Still, advocates of the disabled want the problem solved by the 
			company at the center of the app world -- Apple. Rival Google Inc, 
			whose Android operating system drives more phones than Apple, is 
			also under pressure, but as the creator of the modern smartphone and 
			a long-time champion for the blind, Apple is feeling the most heat.
 
 Apple hasn't been a steady champion: the National Federation of the 
			Blind sued it in 2008 over accessibility of iTunes. Apple settled, 
			agreeing to pay $250,000 and adding captions and other accessibility 
			improvements to iTunes. Since then it has added more such features 
			to its iPhone, iPod, iPad and Apple TV products.
 
 Now, Apple and Google both have developer guidelines on how to make 
			features accessible, such as labeling buttons that can be read by 
			Apple's VoiceOver software.
 
 But they don't require accessibility, in contrast to other strictly 
			enforced rules, such as a ban on apps that present crude or 
			objectionable content. Nor do they offer an accessibility rating 
			system, which some disabled advocates say would be a big help.
 
 That is where the new debate starts: should the blind return to 
			court for protection they believe is guaranteed by law, or nudge 
			their old ally to work harder? Should they pursue app makers, as 
			some lawyers have, or Apple and Google?
 
 Attorney Daniel Goldstein, who brought the suit against Apple in 
			2008 as counsel for the National Federation of the Blind, said the 
			2008 action could provide a model for a suit focused on apps, but 
			the Federation says no lawsuit is being considered.
 
 At last week's National Federation of the Blind convention, members 
			approved a resolution to press Apple to create and enforce 
			accessibility standards. In the halls there was some debate about 
			whether or when to play hard ball over requirements that apps be 
			accessible.
 
 "It's time for Apple to step up or we will take the next step," said 
			Michael Hingson, board member for the National Association of the 
			Blind's California chapter, describing litigation as "the only 
			resort" if Apple did not bring accessibility requirements to the app 
			store.
 
 To be sure, Apple, Google, Twitter and other technology companies 
			have increasingly accommodated users with impairments in recent 
			years.
 
 Many developers are ready to help when they learn there is a 
			problem, said Chris Maury, whose Conversant Labs builds apps for the 
			visually impaired.
 
            
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			"I try to lead with the carrot and not the stick. It’s better to 
			inform developers that accessibility is the right thing to do and an 
			opportunity to reach a whole new base of users. It shouldn’t just be 
			about compliance or avoiding legal risks,” he said.
 There is a worldwide market of 1.1 billion people with disabilities, 
			according to research firm Fifth Quadrant Analytics. Nearly 21 
			million U.S. adults experience vision loss, according to the 2012 
			National Health Interview Survey, and approximately 28 million have 
			a hearing impairment, according to the American 
			Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
 
 Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook in a 2013 speech at Auburn University 
			described people with disabilities "in a struggle to have their 
			human dignity acknowledged." He said, "They're frequently left in 
			the shadows of technological advancements that are a source of 
			empowerment and attainment for others."
 
			The company declined to comment on its accessibility strategy or 
			whether developers should be required to make apps accessible.
 PROBLEMS
 
 Problems on apps begin with unlabeled buttons, which can't be read 
			by the machine. New features and graphics can be particularly 
			challenging, and many companies upgrade an app, before bringing 
			their accessibility features up to date in a follow-up release. The 
			result is unexpected, dramatic changes in usability.
 
 Several members of the National Association of the Blind told 
			Reuters they struggle with apps from Bank of America, TuneIn, 
			Southwest, Mint and Netflix, among others. Bank of America declined 
			to comment. Netflix said it had made big strides on captioning and 
			the others said they were working to improve accessibility.
 
			By contrast, ride service Uber and Twitter, frequently win kudos for 
			their apps.
 Google Accessibility Engineering Manager Eve Andersson told Reuters 
			that product teams are increasingly encouraged to consider users 
			with special needs at the outset.
 
 "We can't stick on accessibility band aids," she said. The company 
			now offers training on accessibility implementation and design in 
			Zurich, Mountain View and New York, she added. She declined to 
			comment on whether Google would require apps be accessible.
 
			 
			
 Apple also is encouraging developers to include accessibility, 
			bringing executives from Fleksy, which designed an oversize virtual 
			keyboard, to describe their experience at the June developers 
			conference, for instance.
 
 Apple's next version of its phone operating system, iOS 8, will have 
			a "speak screen" features that reads whatever is on the screen, 
			improved zoom, and support for hearing aids for hearing impaired 
			made by companies including ReSound. Apple helped develop the 
			hearing aid.
 
 Howard Rosenblum, chief executive officer of the National 
			Association of the Deaf, wants more. "Any app should be accessible 
			to everyone," he said.
 
 (Editing by Edwin Chan and Peter Henderson)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 
			2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be 
			published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |