| 
			
			 Past reports have also linked having a short interpregnancy interval 
			with a greater risk of premature birth. 
 The new study “brings up the importance of adequate birth spacing as 
			a potential modifiable way that women, especially high-risk women, 
			can decrease their chance of having a preterm baby,” Emily DeFranco 
			told Reuters Health.
 
 She worked on the study at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical 
			Center in Ohio.
 
 “Women who are at the highest risk for preterm birth are those who 
			have had a previous premature birth so (for those women it is) 
			especially important to try to optimize their pregnancy timing,” 
			DeFranco said.
 
 The findings suggest a short interpregnancy interval is also linked 
			to the risk of a baby being born a week or two early, though not 
			technically premature. These early term births at 37 and 38 weeks of 
			gestation (full term is 39 to 40 weeks) can have a negative impact 
			on a newborn’s health, say the authors.
 
 
			
			 
			For their study, DeFranco and her colleagues analyzed information 
			from Ohio birth records from 2006 to 2011. They were able to find 
			the interpregnancy interval for about 450,000 babies born to mothers 
			who had given birth previously.
 
 About 11% of the births occurred after an interpregnancy interval of 
			12 to 18 months and about 2% followed an interpregnancy interval of 
			less than 12 months.
 
 The researchers found that 53% of women with interpregnancy 
			intervals of less than 12 months gave birth before the 39th week of 
			pregnancy, compared with about 38% of women who had normal 
			interpregnancy intervals of at least 18 months.
 
 Twenty percent of women with the shortest interpregnancy intervals 
			delivered prematurely - before 37 weeks - compared to 10% of women 
			who waited 12 to 18 months between pregnancies and about 8%of women 
			with a normal interpregnancy interval.
 
 African American mothers were more likely to have short 
			interpregnancy intervals. They were also more likely to have 
			premature births, even when their pregnancies were at least 18 
			months apart, according to findings published June 4 online in BJOG: 
			An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
 
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			DeFranco said researchers aren’t entirely certain why a shorter time 
			between pregnancies might increase the risk of earlier birth, but 
			that it probably has to do with nutritional depletion, which has 
			been associated with a variety of pregnancy complications. 
			It’s important for women to use birth control and plan for adequate 
			time between pregnancies, she said.
 “I do love this paper and I think that it shows that we need to 
			really pay attention to this interpregnancy interval and be aware of 
			trying to help our patients figure out exactly what their plans 
			are,” Dr. Mary Rosser told Reuters Health in an email. Rosser, an 
			obstetrician and gynecologist at Montefiore Medical Center in New 
			York, was not involved in the new study.
 
 “I really feel like there needs to be a ‘birth plan’ where patients 
			are involved in their reproductive health so that they choose a 
			birth control method - and maybe this is discussed during the 
			pregnancy, not with the post-partum visit when it’s almost too 
			late,” she said.
 
 Rosser said there are additional reasons to wait at least 18 months 
			between pregnancies. Waiting could help mothers manage their weight 
			and stay healthy and also benefit their earlier child’s health and 
			wellbeing.
 
 
			
			 
			“In the gynecology world we really would like to prolong that 
			interpregnancy interval so that mom has a chance to bond with that 
			child,” she said. “We're also trying to stress the importance of 
			breastfeeding.”
 
 SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1qdtlDG BJOG 2014.
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |