| 
				 U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon in Manhattan rejected 
				Sirius' request to dismiss the lawsuit accusing the satellite 
				radio company of playing pre-1972 songs from the band the 
				Turtles, best known for the hit "Happy Together," without 
				permission or paying royalties. 
 She said that unless Sirius by Dec. 5 raises any factual issues 
				requiring a trial, she will rule outright for the plaintiff, Flo 
				& Eddie Inc, a company controlled by founding Turtles members 
				Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, and begin to assess damages.
 
 Sirius and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests 
				for comment.
 
 Harvey Geller, a lawyer for Flo & Eddie, said his client is 
				pleased. "From coast to coast, the owners of pre-1972 recordings 
				are finally getting what is owed to them," he said.
 
 Though songs recorded before Feb. 15, 1972, are not covered by 
				federal copyright law, some recording artists and labels have 
				been seeking copyright protection under individual state laws.
 
				 Flo & Eddie sued Sirius in New York, California and Florida, 
				seeking class action status and more than $100 million of 
				damages for alleged infringements by New York-based Sirius.
 In September, U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled in the 
				California case that the band had a right "to possess and use 
				its sound recordings and prevent others from using them." The 
				court in Florida has yet to rule on Sirius' liability.
 
 In the New York lawsuit, Sirius said state law didn't cover the 
				band's claims, and that its copies of Turtles recordings 
				constituted fair use.
 
 McMahon, however, called it "common sense" that "Flo and Eddie 
				would suffer market harm when Sirius takes its property and 
				exploits it, unchanged and for a profit."
 
			[to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			She said Congress had authorized New York to regulate pre-1972 
			recordings, and that the state has long protected public performance 
			rights in works other than sound recordings.
 "Sirius suggests no reason why New York - a state traditionally 
			protective of performers and performance rights - would treat sound 
			recordings differently," she wrote.
 
 McMahon acknowledged that her decision and Gutierrez's could have 
			far-reaching consequences, such as prompting other lawsuits or 
			causing more states to change their copyright laws, but said "the 
			broader policy problems are not for me to consider."
 
 Sirius has said it will appeal Gutierrez's decision. [ID:nL2N0RW3CF] 
			Flo & Eddie has also sued Internet radio company Pandora Media Inc.
 
 The case is Flo & Eddie Inc v. Sirius XM Radio Inc et al, U.S. 
			District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-05784.
 
 (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Leslie Adler)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |