United
Airlines dumps losing hedges, mulls new ones for long
term
Send a link to a friend
[January 10, 2015]
By Jeffrey Dastin
(Reuters) - United Airlines <UAL.N> has
paid a premium to dump old losing bets on higher oil prices, and is
reviewing its strategy for insulating itself from oil market volatility,
in a sign of how some airlines' efforts to hedge their fuel costs have
backfired.
|
The Chicago-based carrier reported Friday that it has shrunk its
hedge position to cover 22 percent of the fuel it consumes in 2015,
down from the 24 percent it had anticipated when oil prices were
higher.
The airline said it did so at a cost, raising its average fuel
expenses last quarter to $2.83 per gallon from up to $2.76 per
gallon, the price it had estimated on Dec. 8.
This move represents just one step of a broader effort parent
company United Continental Holdings Inc has taken to evaluate its
fuel hedges, a United spokesman told Reuters.
At stake for United and its rivals are potentially billions of
dollars in gains or losses that could flow from what amount to
sophisticated bets on the future of oil and jet fuel prices.
Guessing wrong could hurt profits and leave an airline vulnerable to
competitive pressure from rivals that guess right, and have more
cash to spend on new planes or better-appointed airport facilities.
Oil is the largest variable cost for airlines, often representing a
third or more of their operating expenses. Plunging oil prices, down
more than 55 percent since June, overall have buoyed airline profits
and sent their shares soaring.
But the oil price drop caught many carriers off guard, as they had
purchased financial instruments that protected against rising prices
and that required them to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in
collateral when prices fell.
United Airlines now must decide whether the cost of closing more of
its existing hedges outweighs the risk of posting more collateral if
prices continue to fall.
NEW HEDGES
Company officials have met to discuss whether United should unwind
its hedges more than it announced Friday, the spokesman said.
They have also frequently discussed whether prices have bottomed out
enough for them to make new hedges that could cover multiple years
of fuel consumption, although they have yet to make any decisions
and are keeping all options on the table.
[to top of second column] |
A multi-year bet by Southwest Airlines Co <LUV.N> more than a decade
ago protected the airline while oil costs for the industry soared.
"Southwest looked clairvoyant when they hedged at $30 (per barrel),
and then the price shot up to $70 or $80," United's Chief Financial
Officer John Rainey said in one section, reviewed by Reuters, of a
recent memo to the carrier's pilots.
"We're mindful of this possibility and are closely evaluating our
options."
Yet locking in prices long-term comes at a premium, with $50 call
options nearly twice as expensive when they expire in Dec. 2017 than
those that last until Dec. 2015, for example.
And losses from a bad bet would be significant, as a $1 change in
the price of oil amounts to $100 million for United, according to
the memo.
"It's prudent to be a little bit cautious here, and we'd like to see
if there's a new trading band that forms," Rainey said.
(Reporting by Jeffrey Dastin and Catherine Ngai in New York. Editing
by Joe White and Christian Plumb)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|