Features,  Releases to the Media,  Election Information,

Referendums,  Meet the Candidates,  Letters of Endorsement,

Calendar of Events,  District Maps

Features

A day in the life of an election judge

[NOV. 4, 2002]  Help wanted: Election Judge. Friendly, civic-minded person to work 15-hour day with no breaks, 1-2 days a year. $75 per day, $25 bonus for attending instruction. Two-year commitment required. See your local precinct committeeman.

Do you ever wonder on Election Day who would be willing to work 15 hours straight for just above minimum wage? In the 44 Logan County precincts, 220 dedicated citizens will do just that on Nov. 5.

Marian Adams, an Atlanta election judge for 21 years, said she sets her alarm for 4:15 a.m. so she can reach the City Hall boardroom by 5 to prepare for the 6 o’clock opening of the polls. Among set-up jobs are checking all voting devices to see that they have the right candidate lists, marking all voting booths and placing a "Polling Place" sign in a visible spot. Staff of Logan County Clerk Sally Litterly have already set up the booths and ballot box.

At the other end of the day it takes Adams and the other four judges at Atlanta 3 about an hour and 15 minutes to process absentee votes, count ballots cast, remove chads and check for write-in votes. "We’re the last precinct to get done," she confessed. Then there’s still the 20-minute drive to the courthouse.

"It’s a long day," Adams admitted, "but I like to see the results and who has gotten out to vote." She also sees purpose in the job: "It’s doing our part for the community in which we live."

Tom Lowe, East Lincoln 8 judge for 12 years, said there are personal benefits. "I get to meet some people I see only at election time," he noted. "I feel like I’m doing something I like to be into. I’ve always been interested in politics."

Litterly underscored the judges’ importance: "It’s necessary to have judges of both parties to guarantee the integrity of the election." Her day is even longer than theirs. She typically reaches the courthouse by 4:30 a.m. and stays until midnight or later.

During a major election five judges staff each of the 44 polling places in the county. Two are Democrats, and three are Republicans. West Lincoln 8 judge Brenda Short, who has been on the job for 18 years, said there are four stations. The first person pulls the appropriate application, asks the voter to sign and offers instruction in voting. Next, two judges of different parties check the registration book to verify the voter’s signature and address and mark the voter’s record. The next judge initials the appropriate ballot or ballots, gives them to the voter, and keeps a running total of ballots. The last judge receives the punched ballots and places them in the ballot box.

Sometimes the voter is not registered in the precinct. In that case judges try to discover the correct polling place and direct the person there. The last resort on this issue, as on any other that arises, is a call to Litterly’s office. She said she fields questions all day, but some are hypothetical rather than immediate.

Adams explained that her precinct’s biggest problem with voters in the wrong place occurred when Atlanta 2 was split. Citizens on the north side of Vine Street were inadvertently assigned to the wrong precinct. Eventually, three or four people had to drive to Lincoln to clear up their registration. One voter still refuses to make the drive, Adams noted.

Short said her precinct once received the wrong binder of registration cards. Fortunately, the judges quickly ascertained whose binder they had and exchanged with that precinct.

Handing out ballots seems an easy task but can be complicated when different voters get different ballots. This happens in primary elections when voters must get the ballot for the correct party. It also happens when a person has recently moved and is entitled to vote for federal but not local offices. And it occurs when different districts vote at the same place. Then some voters get a particular ballot, such as a tax referendum, while others don’t.

Lowe said the recent switch to electing county board members by district created a problem because two different districts vote at East Lincoln 8. He said it took 10 minutes to figure out which ballots to use for each district, identify the corresponding vote recorders and rename the booths.

Only an election judge may place the ballot in the ballot box. This judge first checks for the ballot distribution judge’s initials, without removing the ballot from the envelope.

Judges rotate positions during the day so all are familiar with every process.

[to top of second column in this article]

Voters often notice the lineup of chips, sandwiches and other goodies. For the most part these are brought by the judges themselves. Short said sometimes a precinct committeeman or even a candidate brings a box of doughnuts. Casey’s General Store supplies pizza slices and chicken strips to all three Atlanta precincts, and one time a Beich employee brought candy, Adams recalled. Judges eat at their stations but try to keep the tables neat.

As far as the obvious need for a break, the election judge manual says, "When the polls are open, one judge at a time may leave the polling place for a very brief period, and only when absolutely necessary." Judges must sign in and out for their absences.

Occasionally citizens, especially those new to the county, are confused about the voting procedure. "It’s amazing that people don’t want to ask for help," Short commented. As a result, sometimes ballots are spoiled and have to be replaced. Lowe said that at his precinct people sometimes try to punch their ballots using the pencil provided for write-in votes. Judges then have to clean the lead out of the device.

Adams said a problem in primary elections is that voters are reluctant to state their party and sometimes do so in a whisper so soft the judge cannot hear. She attributes the lower turnout for primary elections to this same reluctance.

Inappropriate attempts to influence other voters are rare but do occasionally occur. At East Lincoln 8, judges have removed a note naming a write-in candidate from a polling booth. Lowe said people sometimes write on the candidate list, so judges must check periodically to see that nothing has been tampered with. In Atlanta an unidentified telephone number was once found written on a voting device at the end of the day. Short said that in one election she had to check booths frequently because people were writing "Vote for Candidate X" on the device. In such a case, judges first try to erase the message completely. If that is not possible, it’s time for a call to Litterly for a new device.

Once the polls close at 7 p.m., judges check to see that the number of ballots equals the number of applications. Adams said that in her precinct a careful recount has always resulted in the expected number. Short observed that skipping a number on the applications is the most common reason for an apparent mismatch.

Absentee ballots are processed after voting ends, because if people come to the polls, their prior absentee ballots are discarded. Lowe said someone once voted absentee on a sample ballot, which had to be considered spoiled.

The manual gives procedures for various discrepancies. If more votes are cast than applications filled out, ballots are withdrawn at random to make the counts match. If a person over-votes, for example writing in a name and also punching one for the same office, two judges of different parties fill out a new ballot marking the voter’s choices for all other offices. If chads or wrinkling make the ballot uncountable, again two judges revote it. Adams, Lowe and Short all said they have never encountered these problems.

Depending on the number voting and the judges’ speed, closing procedures may take 30 minutes to an hour and a half. When everything is in order and the necessary forms are signed, a Republican and a Democratic judge drive the ballots and other materials to the courthouse for the official count. Then it’s home for a well-earned rest. "The next day you’re really kind of exhausted," Lowe observed.

Short said she wishes the day could be shortened, but consolidating school board and general elections has helped. Sometimes for board elections her precinct drew only about 20 voters, making for a boring and expensive day.

It costs $22,000 to pay Logan County judges for one election and somewhat less if a few skip the biennial instruction. For a smaller election with only three judges per precinct, it still costs $13,200. And that doesn’t count other expenses, such as printing the ballots, staff overtime and polling place rental. The state pays the $25 per judge for training, but the county bears the rest of the expense.

[Lynn Spellman]

Releases to the Media

[NOV. 4, 2002]  Carl Oblinger, candidate for the Illinois House of Representatives, announced a proposal on Oct. 30 to reopen the Lincoln Developmental Center in Lincoln.

Oblinger will push for legislation to create a three-member commission with representatives of the Illinois Department of Human Services, the employees of the Lincoln Developmental Center and LDC client families. The commission would evaluate which patients in the DHS system would benefit from being transferred to LDC, develop a schedule to reopen the facility and recall employees, and formulate the necessary funding requests for the 2004 state budget.

"We still have valuable, skilled staff members and a physical plant at the Lincoln Developmental Center capable of meeting the needs of the developmentally disabled citizens of the state," said Oblinger. "Under a new administration we can find the means to reopen the Lincoln Developmental Center and better meet the needs of Illinois’ most vulnerable citizens."

Oblinger again criticized the Ryan administration for the failures at the LDC. "Governor Ryan appointed an unqualified administration at the facility and did not correct problems in a timely manner," said Oblinger.

"The governor packed the Health Facilities Planning Board to assure the board’s agreements to close LDC. And the Ryan administration failed to address the overall quality of care for patients throughout Illinois and how the closure of LDC would affect those services," added Oblinger.

Oblinger also criticized his opponent, Rich Brauer, for failing to support the community’s efforts to save the center. "I think Rich Brauer’s priorities are wrong and will harm the Lincoln economy as well as the developmentally disabled citizens of Illinois," he said.

[News release]

Justice John Turner supported

[OCT. 31, 2002]  Justice John Turner, candidate for the 4th District Appellate Court, announced Wednesday that he has received the support of 21 of the state’s attorneys from the 30 counties comprising the 4th Judicial District.

Justice Turner indicated that his support from the state’s attorneys is in recognition of the breadth of his experience in criminal law, public safety and law enforcement. Turner has been serving on the appellate court since June 1, 2001, following his unanimous appointment by the Illinois Supreme Court.

"In this time when homeland security is the main focus across America, I am pleased to have the support of chief law enforcement officers in the 30-county area I serve," said Turner.

The state’s attorneys serve the following counties: Adams, Brown, Champaign, Clark, Cumberland, DeWitt, Douglas, Edgar, Ford, Livingston, Logan, McLean, Macon, Mason, Menard, Morgan, Moultrie, Sangamon, Schuyler, Vermilion and Woodford.

Turner said he is proud to add the state’s attorneys to those already supporting his candidacy, including former Chief Justice Ben Miller, former Gov. Jim Edgar, the Illinois Civil Justice League, National Federation of Independent Businesses, the Illinois Education Association and the Illinois Committee For Honest Government. He has also been endorsed by the State Journal-Register and the Chicago Tribune.

[News release]

Turner receives endorsement from
Committee For Honest Government

[OCT. 11, 2002]  Justice John Turner, candidate for the 4th District Appellate Court, announced he has received the endorsement of the Illinois Committee For Honest Government. Turner has been serving on the appellate court since June 1, 2001, following his appointment by the Illinois Supreme Court.

The Illinois Committee for Honest Government was formed in 1986 to work for a variety of reforms and to promote increased responsiveness in all levels and branches of government. After evaluating Turner's credentials the committee found Justice Turner clearly worthy of the organization’s support, stating, "Turner will be an outstanding member of the appellate court."

Judge Turner is a former lawmaker, having served in the Illinois General Assembly from 1994-2001. He was a member of the House Judiciary Criminal Law Committee, Prosecutorial Misconduct Committee and Spokesman of the House Judiciary Civil Law Committee. Prior to his seven-year stint as a lawmaker, Turner was twice elected as Logan County state’s attorney. Turner is also the former Logan County public defender, and he was engaged in a private law practice, most recently with the firm Kelly & Turner, P.C.

[to top of second column in this article]

"My many years of practice in the courtroom, as well as my experience as a lawmaker, are serving me well on the bench. I immensely enjoy my duties on the appellate court, and I thank the justices of the Illinois Supreme Court for the faith and trust they reposed in me by appointing me as an appellate court justice," said Turner.

Turner lives in rural Atlanta with his wife, Kim, and their 9-year-old son, Jack. Justice Turner has been campaigning in all 30 counties comprising the 4th Judicial District.

"I am taking my message to the good people who live in the 4th District. I am working hard for them on the bench, and I am working well with the other justices on the court. I have participated in handing down hundreds of decisions, and I am asking the citizens of the 4th District to allow my continued service," Turner said.

[Press release]

[SEPT. 27, 2002]  CHICAGO — A spokesperson for Democratic attorney general candidate Lisa Madigan today called on DuPage County State’s Attorney Joe Birkett to immediately pay back a $10,000 loan that Birkett admits he solicited from DuPage County Circuit Judge John Elsner to support his campaign. Birkett says he intends to repay the loan only after the election is over

"This practice of a state’s attorney soliciting and accepting a loan from a sitting judge in his home county raises serious ethical questions and undermines the public’s faith in a fair and impartial judicial process," Melissa Merz said. "Paying back the loan after the election is like returning groceries after you’ve eaten them. It does nothing to correct the potential conflict of interest between Birkett and Judge Elsner."

Birkett has been under fire in recent weeks for accepting contributions and loans from defense attorneys involved in plea bargaining to get lighter sentences for their clients. In addition, he has solicited and received loans from well-connected DuPage County criminal defense attorneys. Birkett received loans of $100,000 from DuPage County lawyer Tim Martin and $10,000 from attorney Terry Ekl. Martin and Ekl, Birkett’s former campaign manager, both represent clients being prosecuted by Birkett.

Martin’s firm played up its insider connection with Birkett’s office in a promotional brochure that boasts of the firm’s "knowledge and ability to conduct very favorable plea negotiations." Another part of the brochure says the firm can often "win your case by filing a motion to quash arrest and suppress evidence."

[to top of second column in this article]

In another case, a lawyer who contributed $3,100 to Birkett’s campaign secured a plea bargain that resulted in a sentence of probation, and 34 days of jail time already served, for a man who attempted to murder his wife by pushing her into a fire.

Since August 1995, Birkett has received approximately $244,430 in direct contributions from criminal defense attorneys located in DuPage County. He has received approximately $141,000 in loans from the same group during the same time period.

"A clear pattern has emerged in DuPage County that shows a tight circle of well-connected lawyers manipulating the criminal justice system to their benefit. Joe Birkett is at the center of that circle," Merz said

[Press release]

Election Information

[NOV. 4, 2002] 

• Be sure to insert your ballot card completely into the machine, number side up.

• Use the metal stylus to punch candidate(s) of your choice.

• Read instructions on the ballot pages for each office.

• After voting, remove ballot card and verify for accuracy.

• Be sure all paper chads are removed and the ballot card has not been bent or torn.

• If you have made an error, return the ballot card to an election judge.

• If the vote recorder is not working properly, notify an election judge immediately.

[From Logan County Clerk Sally J. Litterly]

[NOV. 4, 2002]  There are many different ballot styles for Logan County. We at LDN have provided a compilation sample ballot of all styles. On sections where no styles are indicated, all styles vote. See below to determine which style is yours. If there are more than one style listed for your precinct, you will be given a style when you get to your polling place tomorrow. Please note, you will vote for the same districts as those you voted on in the primaries.  If you have any questions or concerns, you can call the Logan County clerk’s office at 732-4148.
Click here for the sample ballot.

[to top of second column in this article]

New district information for voters

Logan County divisions create new representative and legislative districts

County board is also by districts now

[OCT. 4, 2002]  Logan County has been divided into the 87th and 100th representative districts through the state’s redistricting process. The division has also created new legislative districts for senators. The 87th and 88th representative districts will now form the 44th Legislative District, and the 99th and 100th representative districts create the 50th Legislative District.

Most of the northern and southeastern portions of Logan County are in the 87th Representative District and 44th Legislative District. The southwest portion of the county and the majority of Lincoln are situated in the 100th Representative District and 50th Legislative District.

Logan County will also have new county board districts.

District 1: Atlanta 1, Atlanta 2, Atlanta 3, Eminence, Orvil 1, Orvil 2, Prairie Creek, Sheridan and part of West Lincoln 7 (north of Route 10 West and Interstate 55).

District 2: Broadwell, Corwin, Elkhart 1, Elkhart 2, Hurlbut, West Lincoln 6 and part of West Lincoln 7 (south of Route 10 West and Interstate 55)

District 3: Mount Pulaski 1, Mount Pulaski 2, Mount Pulaski 3, Mount Pulaski 4, Aetna, Chester, Lake Fork, Oran and Laenna.

District 4: East Lincoln 1, East Lincoln 2, East Lincoln 3, East Lincoln 6, East Lincoln 8 (part) and West Lincoln 1.

District 5: West Lincoln 2, West Lincoln 3, West Lincoln 4, West Lincoln 5, West Lincoln 8, West Lincoln 9 and West Lincoln 10.

District 6: East Lincoln 4, East Lincoln 5, East Lincoln 8 (part), East Lincoln 9, East Lincoln 10, East Lincoln 11 and East Lincoln 12.

[to top of second column in this article]

Districts are printed on the registration cards that voters received earlier in the year. If you are confused about your voting districts, please feel free to contact the county clerk’s office in the courthouse in Lincoln.

If you need to change your address, have incorrect information on your voter registration card, or have married and changed your name, it is necessary for you to contact our office by Oct. 8 in order to be eligible to cast a full ballot in the Nov. 5 general election.

As always, we encourage your participation in the election process. It is through the process of democracy that our great nation will continue to enjoy the unalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

[Sally J. Litterly, Logan County clerk and recorder]

Register to vote in the
November general election

[SEPT. 27, 2002]  SPRINGFIELD –– Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White is reminding citizens that Oct. 8 is the deadline for applying to register to vote in the Nov. 5 general election through the motor voter program. The secretary of state’s office gives citizens the opportunity to fill out an application to register to vote when applying for or renewing a driver’s license or state identification card. However, the secretary of state’s office only sends the application to the voter’s election authority, which is responsible for registering voters.

"Voting is one of our most precious rights that we cannot and should not ignore," White said, "especially at a time when America is uniting to exercise the very freedoms upon which this country was founded."

White said that all secretary of state facilities take applications for registration through the motor voter program from those who come to the facility to obtain or renew their drivers’ licenses or identification cards. But after Oct. 8, people who file applications through the motor voter program will not be registered for the general election on Nov. 5.

In 2000, White formed a committee headed by Dr. Paul Green of Roosevelt University’s School of Policy Studies that reviewed the motor voter program and recommended a number of changes. The secretary of state’s office has implemented those changes to streamline the motor voter program and make it more efficient.

For more information on voter registration, call the Illinois State Board of Elections at (217) 782-4141.

[Press release]

Lincoln alderman candidate petitions available

[SEPT. 20, 2002]  Public notice:

Petitions for nomination of candidates for alderman for the city of Lincoln consolidated primary election to be held Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2003, are available in the city clerk’s office at City Hall from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday (except holidays).

[Juanita Josserand, city clerk]

Referendums

• "City issues fact statement on sales tax referendum," posted Oct. 22
• "Council seeks ways to promote sales tax hike," posted Oct. 16
• "City sales tax increase will be on the ballot," posted Aug. 20
• "City may ask for sales tax increase," posted July 24

Chester-East Lincoln School referendum

• "Chester-East Lincoln School seeks funds through referendum," posted Oct. 5

[OCT. 22, 2002]  The Lincoln City Council, in an effort to promote the sales tax referendum that will be on the ballot Nov. 5, has issued a fact sheet explaining the tax. Aldermen will be passing out the sheet to city voters.

Compiled by city treasurer Les Plotner, the fact sheet explains what the tax will cost and why it is needed. Because of historically low interest rates and also lower sales tax revenue, the city has no money to upgrade its infrastructure, Plotner said. There is no money for street repair in the current city budget, he pointed out, not because the council doesn’t see the need but because funds are not available.

The projected annual income of $550,000 from the tax increase will be used only for improvements to city streets and alleys, drains and sewer line extensions, and other infrastructure.

See fact sheet below.

[Joan Crabb]

•  The voters of Lincoln will have the opportunity to vote on the sales tax increase referendum at the general election on TUESDAY, NOV. 5. Your city council in Lincoln is asking you to approve an increase of one-half of 1 percent on the Retailers’ Occupation Tax, which is commonly known as the SALES TAX.

•  People want to know how such an increase in the sales tax would affect them. Perhaps the following examples will give people an idea about how the sales tax increase would directly affect them as individuals purchasing various items:

Consumer pays $10 for a pair of gloves.

Increased tax cost, 5 cents.

Consumer pays $50 for two gallons of paint.

Increased tax cost, 25 cents.

Consumer pays $100 for a new lamp.

Increased tax cost, 50 cents.

•  The new sales tax WOULD NOT be imposed on certain items. It would not be added to food products people purchase for home consumption. Other items that are exempt from the increased sales tax include prescription and nonprescription medicines, drugs, medical appliances, insulin, urine testing materials, syringes and needles used for diabetics. In addition, the tax WOULD NOT be charged on the sale of motor vehicles.

[to top of second column in this section]

•  The burden of a sales tax would be spread out over anyone who purchases items in Lincoln, including out-of-town shoppers. Lincoln has one of the lowest sales tax rates among the larger cities in the central Illinois area.

•  Lincoln has a desperate need to expand and improve our public infrastructure. We simply don’t have the funds to complete projects or to maintain our current infrastructure, nor do we have the funding for future growth expansion.

•  What does this word "INFRASTRUCTURE" mean? Public infrastructure includes streets and roads, bridges, access roads, sidewalks, sewer line extensions, storm water drainage, and sewer treatment facilities.

•  Based upon current projections the city of Lincoln should be able to realize about $550,000 each year in increased revenues as a result of the sales tax increase. The increased revenues must by law be used to update the city’s infrastructure system.

[Compiled by Les Plotner, city treasurer]

Meet the Candidates

Links to candidate information on the Web

Illinois Senate, 44th District

Bill Brady (R):
http://www.citizensforbillbrady.com

Gerald A. Bradley (D):
no website available

Illinois Senate, 50th District

Larry Bomke (R):
http://www.legis.state.il.us/bios/senate/
BOMKE.html

Don Tracy (D):
wtracy56@msn.com
Citizens for Tracy

Illinois House, 100th District

Rich Brauer (R):
http://www.richbrauer.com

Carl Oblinger (D):
no website available

Illinois Supreme Court, 4th District

Rita Garman (R):
http://www.ritabgarman.com/

Sue Myerscough (D):
http://www.illinoisjudges2000.com/
Courts-Candidates-Myerscough.htm

Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District

John Turner (R):
http://www.illinoisjudges2000.com/Courts-Candidates-Turner.htm

Bill Trapp (D):
http://www.illinoisjudges2000.com/Courts-Candidates-Trapp.htm

U.S. House of Representatives,
18th District

Ray LaHood (R):
http://www.raylahood.com

U.S. Senate

Jim Durkin (R):
http://www.durkinforsenate.org

Dick Durbin (D):
http://www.durbinforsenate.com/

Steven Burgauer (L):
http://www.burgauer2002.com/

Governor/Lieutenant

Jim Ryan/Carl Hawkinson (R):
http://www.jimryanforgovernor.com/

Rod Blagojevich/Pat Quinn (D):
http://www.rodforus.com/
http://www.votequinn.com/

Cal Skinner/James Tobin (L):
http://www.skinnerforgovernor.org/

Marisellis Brown (I):
no website available

Attorney general

Joe Birkett (R):
http://www.joebirkett.com/

Lisa Madigan (D):
http://www.lisamadigan.org/

Gary Shilts (L):
 

Secretary of state

Kristine O'Rourke Cohn (R):
http://www.cohn2002.com

Jesse White (D):
http://www.sos.state.il.us/

Matt Beauchamp (L):
http://www.15orfree.com

Treasurer

Judy Baar Topinka (R):
http://www.state.il.us/treas/
http://www.judybaartopinka.com

Thomas Dart (D):
http://www.tomdart.com

Rhys Read (L):
http://www.readfortreasurer.org/

Comptroller

Thomas Jefferson Ramsdell (R):
http://www.vote4ramsdell.com

Daniel Hynes (D):
http://www.ioc.state.il.us/
http://www.friendsofdan.com

Julie Fox (L):
http://www.JulieFox.org

Letters of Endorsement

The Lincoln Daily News publishes letters to the editor as they are received.
 The letters are not edited in content and do not necessarily reflect 
the views of Lincoln Daily News.

Lincoln Daily News requests that writers responding to controversial issues address the issue and refrain from personal attacks. Thank you!

Dear Editor:

I am writing in regard to Rod Blagojevich’s television ads using "ordinary citizens" who accuse Attorney General Jim Ryan of failing to investigate the "licenses-for-bribes" scandal in the secretary of state’s office. His accusation is knowingly false and purposely misleading.

Attorney General Ryan has been asked about this subject repeatedly over the course of his campaign for governor. He has stated that the investigation into the corruption in George Ryan’s office was a federal investigation from the beginning. To launch a parallel investigation by the attorney general would have been irresponsible. But don’t take his word for it. Jim Bums (a former Democratic candidate for governor) was the U.S. attorney when this investigation started. He believes that Jim Ryan acted properly in staying out of the federal investigators’ way and not interfering. Former U.S. Attorneys Dan Webb, Anton Valukas, Bill Roberts and Sam Skinner have described Blagojevich’s assertions as "ridiculous."

[to top of second column in this letter]

Former New York Mayor and U.S. Attorney Rudy Giuliani has said that if Jim Ryan had launched his own investigation he would be defending himself against accusations of interfering with a federal investigation.

Not one law enforcement official in the state has been willing to stand up in support of Blagojevich’s claim that Jim Ryan neglected his duties. In fact, every law enforcement official, without exception, called upon to comment on this matter has indicated that Jim Ryan’s conduct was proper. Nonetheless, Blagojevich continues to spend millions smearing Jim Ryan with these baseless allegations to deceive voters.

Blagojevich must think that voters will mindlessly accept anything they are told. I believe he is wrong and that the good people of our state are a great deal smarter than he gives us credit for. Jim Ryan is a person of honor and integrity who would not compromise that integrity for votes. That is why I will be casting my vote for Jim Ryan.

Sincerely,

Carla Bender

Lincoln

(posted 11-4-02)

Dear Editor:

It’s time for Sen. Larry Bomke to tell "the rest of the story." Sen. Bomke has repeatedly stated in brochures and radio campaign ads that he has given back $275,000 of his district office money to the state. He also has never refuted the Chicago Sun-Times article (Feb. 25, 2001) that he is one of the "most frugal legislators" and spends only $20,000 a year for office expenses.

How does Sen. Bomke pay for his full-time legislative aide, his legislative secretary, his regular office expenses, his districtwide "Legislative Updates," his "Business Updates" and targeted mailings to special groups? Certainly he could not even pay his full-time legislative aide who has been with him for six years for $20,000 a year. This concerns me because it means that someone else is paying for his expenses. I have heard that he uses unaccounted side funds controlled by Sen. President Pate Phillip to pay his office costs. This allows him to "give back" most of his $67,000 yearly budget. While he praises himself for being a "good guardian of taxpayer money," he doesn’t account for how much money he spends or the source.

[to top of second column in this letter]

How much does this senator’s office cost the taxpayers each year? Citizens have no way to find out, because we don’t know which funds he is using and how much he spends from each. He can’t say he is for honesty and integrity in government if he isn’t honest about how much money he spends for his district office. Sen. Bomke, will you let us know how much taxpayer money is spent to run your office and from which accounts the expenses are paid?

Sincerely,

Pat Graham

(posted 11-4-02)

To the editor:

Steve Nichols is our Republican candidate for Logan County Sheriff. As a law enforcement professional, Steve has been serving the people of the state of Illinois for 18 years. He spent nine years as an Illinois state trooper and has been a criminal investigator with the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services for the past 11 years.

Steve graduated from Western Illinois University with a bachelor’s degree in law enforcement administration. He is an experienced leader and now trains others on forensic and criminal investigation techniques and procedures.

Successful law enforcement today requires expertise and creative management from our law enforcement officials, not just maintenance of the status quo. Steve will restore respect and professionalism to the office of sheriff, hire qualified professionals, provide valuable training, and maintain performance standards for sheriff’s deputies.

We urge the people of Logan County to go out to your voting polls on Nov. 5 and vote for an experienced leader, Steve Nichols for Logan County sheriff. Let’s let him put his skills, experience and common-sense approach to work for us. We sincerely believe with cooperation and teamwork he and his staff can and will make a difference for us and for the youth in Logan County.

Kent and Jill Hower

Lincoln

(posted 10-31-02)

Dear Editor:

I have been a Republican for the past 20 years, but I would like my fellow Republicans to know why they should not vote for Joe Birkett.

As state’s attorney for DuPage County, Birkett’s office chose to prosecute a disabled child for being late to school, though they knew the child’s disability is what caused him to be late, and the school record showed his tardiness was excused. Birkett’s theory was that being five minutes late was the same as being truant for the ent