Lincoln Daily News publishes letters to the editor as
they are received.
The letters are not edited in content and do not
necessarily reflect
the views of Lincoln Daily News.
Lincoln Daily News requests that writers responding to
controversial issues address the issue and refrain from
personal attacks. Thank you!
.
Submit a letter to the editor online |
You may also send your letters by e-mail to
ldneditor@lincolndailynews.com
or by U.S. postal mail:
Letters to the Editor
Lincoln Daily News
601 Keokuk St.
Lincoln, IL 62656
Letters must include the writer's
name, telephone number, and postal address or e-mail address (we
will not publish address or phone number information).
Lincoln Daily News reserves the right to edit letters to
reduce their size or to correct obvious errors.
Lincoln Daily News reserves the right to reject any letter for
any reason. Lincoln Daily News will publish as
many acceptable letters as space allows.
|
To the editor: The recent horse deaths at Arlington Park
from this past May until the present as well as the horses who've
dropped dead at other racetracks and on other off-track stabling
facilities in the state have now finally brought the Illinois Racing
Board into the public's microscope all over the world. The
accountability rests with the IRB, and the cover-ups can now longer
be "brushed under the rug."
Roughly $3 million is spent on a so-called "state-of-the-art
testing facility" that was previously coined the "IRB Labs," with
the name on door of the same offices recently changed to the
University of Illinois at Chicago, overseen by a university doctor.
For years, since the inception of the IRB in 1927 and most
recently in the adoption of the Illinois Horse Racing Act of 1975,
political favors have been done not only to the so-called "chemical
trainers" of the sport but also to the Illinois racetrack owners who
are literally getting away with murder -- to both the horses
themselves as well as to the supporters of the sport: the betting
public and the public eye.
So who's held accountable for one of Illinois' best-kept secrets
in a $10 billion-plus industry in our state? Are these urine and
blood samples really being tested and the truth about the horse
necropsies being reported? It all lies on the select few who are the
IRB employees who run the show and its commissioners, who may be
dumbfounded to know.
On July 11, the IRB addressed the public at its most recent
meeting, with all of the major Chicagoland TV, radio and newspapers
representing themselves to report back to the general public as well
as the racing fans on the cause and effects of the 16 horses who've
supposedly been "put down" or euthanized due to a bad surface or
detrimental weather conditions at a certain north suburban
racetrack.
The sugarcoating down at the IRB offices has lost its sweet
flavor, everyone. The entire thoroughbred industry has several
inconsistencies that need to be addressed, from as simple as the
breeders and consignors who prep the horses to be sold to even the
racetrack veterinarians who've been approving these equine athletes
to race, sometimes without going through pre-race examinations, due
to the funding sources and manpower issues the IRB is facing.
The IRB needs its house cleaned, as its primary function is to
oversee racing in our state as well as maximize state revenue, which
now includes covering up horse deaths and making a recent $13
million for the state. All while the racetrack operators walk away
with tens of millions more due to continued tax breaks and other
political favors benefiting the select deemed few? -- besides making
millions more through recapture, which I feel is UNCONSTITUTIONAL,
based on 1994 "handle," or total revenues generated based on today's
yearly numbers against wagering dollars from '94.
[to top of second column in this letter] |
Just yesterday [July 12; letter written July 13], the IRB
announced its selected speakers for their July 18-19 and 24
so-called "public hearings." [Announcement] The IRB will be holding these "public"
hearings at downtown Chicago offices with 22 speakers who will come
into the spotlight and address preplanned subjects without
addressing the issues of the people who support the sport, as well
as technological, medical-pharmaceutical and competitive variables,
which are truly killing an industry honored, loved and supported by
tens of thousands of people throughout our state. Highly respected
and long-time Commissioner John Simon, a prosecuting attorney, will
be overseeing and thus "grilling" these 22 speakers, when he should
instead be focusing on the root of the problem by investigating and
cleaning house over at the IRB offices on the seventh floor of the
state of Illinois building.
It's time to let the people who feel the need to juice their
horses be prosecuted for their actions by cleaning ALL of the
garbage left under the rug all these years, as well as all of the
political appointees, rather employees, be held accountable for
their shortcomings over the years.
At the most recent IRB meeting this past Tuesday, July 11, the
chairman of the IRB as well as two commissioners weren't present to
address the media. Were they all on the golf course or something?
They should just stay home in the future if they are afraid to "show
face" in the public spotlight.
Too many people across our state have left the business that have
been involved in our sport for generations past, as well as those
who've lost hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to compete and
thus remain competitive with the chemical trainers of today.
Numerous people within and outside the industry were denied to
speak at these "public hearings," based on either the IRB's excuse
for time allocated (they're estimating each hearing day to run
five-six hours) or due to other unknown political reasons they don't
want the public to be exposed to….
We all need to work together to preserve what's left of the
heritage, tradition and history of what's left of Illinois racing
and clean house NOW.
Eric M. Poders
Publisher, The Horseman's Voice
Evanston
(Posted July 14, 2006)
Click here to send a note to the editor
about this letter.
Related article
|