Friday, July 14

Citizens for Education looking for answers from Mount Pulaski school board          Send a link to a friend

[JULY 14, 2006]  A copy of a letter prepared by the Citizens for Education follows:

Dear Taxpayers of CUD #23:

We, the member of Citizens for Education, have made repeated attempts to retrieve information and ask questions of our school board to no avail. The Citizens for Education voted to use the news media as a way to inform all CUD #23 taxpayers of some of concerns we have that affects all taxpayers. Our only goal is to seek the truth. Following are a few of the topics for which we have expressed concern and requested information:

1. Sandy Ellis was terminated from the office of Superintendent of our district with no explanation to the taxpayers. The rumor reports $300,000.00 (three hundred thousand dollars) to $380,000 (three hundred eighty thousand dollars) including a buyout of her contract with the district. All documents pertaining to this issue were requested by Citizens for Education and were denied with the exception of a previously released one page of board meeting minutes in which her termination was accepted by the board. We have been advised that all of these requested documents cannot be sealed from the public because they document the expenditure of taxpayers’ monies. In order to allocate money from the school budget, board members must make a motion, there must be a second, and a full roll call vote is recorded by individual names. That said, the Ellis termination/buy-out was voted on by each school board member serving at that time. As previously requested, we respectfully request a full and complete accounting of the Supt. Sandy Ellis termination as previously requested.

2. The budget for the new addition to the high school building was approved by the school board for $1,200,000 (one million two hundred thousand dollars) and is now rumored to be over $2,400,000 (two million four hundred thousand dollars). We do not feel the taxpayers have been properly informed of such a drastic increase in the cost of this project. We respectfully request a full and complete accounting of the costs involved with the addition instead of continuing with the "pay as you go" policy this school board has adopted.

3. The Citizens for Education requested enrollment figures from the current administration three times and each time a different set of numbers was reported. With this information, our best guess is the high school enrollment will fall below two hundred students in the next two to three years. Our greatest fear is that the State of Illinois will mandate our merging into a county high school because of an insufficient number of students. At a meeting in February 2006 Supt. Phil Shelton responded to this concern by saying, "We are discussing the junior high school now, not the high school." The only responses from the school board to this issue are "you cannot predict the future" and "you cannot plan, only react." We have been informed privately that the population of Mt. Pulaski really doesn’t care one way or another about what happens to the schools. We respectfully request a five year plan as well as a ten year plan for the future of CUD #23 schools from Supt. Shelton and the school board.

4. It has been rumored that too large of a basement area for the new high school addition was excavated and the dirt was given away at no cost. When this error was discovered, it is our understanding that the school district paid for moving the location of the new addition, purchased dirt to fill the hole, and paid to fill the hole itself to the tune of a reported $80,000 (eighty thousand dollars) to $190,000 (one hundred ninety thousand dollars). We respectfully request an answer to each of these questions: Why should the taxpayers foot the bill for this significant error during construction? Why didn’t the engineer and/or the contractor cover the financial aspects of this sizeable error? Are there other errors made by the engineer and contractors that we, as taxpayers, have had to pay for as well?

[to top of second column]

5. In the school financials we have received, the school board appropriates between $4,000 (four thousand dollars) and $6,000 (six thousand dollars) a year so the members can attend the annual school board convention in Chicago. Many school districts have opted out of this convention deeming it as an unnecessary expense. It has been reported CUD #23 is facing a $300,000 (three hundred thousand dollar) deficit in the 2006-2007 budget, but our school board claims they "have taken every cost saving measure possible" including skipping one year of updating computers in the schools. (They are currently back on their three year rotation of the computer lease.) It has been rumored that not all of the school board members and their families arrived on the dates they had reserved a room, so the taxpayers paid for empty hotel rooms. We respectfully request an answer to each of the following questions: How is attendance at the school board convention more important to the education of the children of this school district than updating computers in the schools? What benefit do we, as taxpayers, gain by the board members attending this convention? Was any reimbursement personally made by any school board members for their failure to attend any part of this convention after they made reservations? If the school board members are so frivolous in spending taxpayers’ monies in small matters how can they be trusted in large matters?

6. The United States and State of Illinois governments allow taxpayers access to information discussed during open meetings. The Open Meetings Act requires access to information if taxpayers request this information through the proper channels. The Citizens for Education group has submitted numerous requests and a few of these have been denied. As of June 2006 not one of these requests has been brought to the open session of the school board meetings for approval or denial. (See http://www.ag.state.il.us/ for information regarding the Open Meetings Act.) One taxpayer of this school district requested to address the school board and was denied the request to be on the agenda because the topic of discussion was "too broad." We ask the school board if they feel they are being responsive and respectful of the taxpayers of CUD #23? If so, we respectfully disagree.

These questions are being sent to every school board member as well as several media outlets. Our hope is they will be read at the next scheduled school board meeting, if we are allowed on the agenda, and the school board will answer these questions so the truth will be revealed. We respectfully invite everyone interested to attend the meeting in the Unit District #23 office on Monday, July 17, 2006 at 7:00 p.m.

Sincerely,

Citizens for Education
P.O. Box 285
Elkhart, IL 62634

 

From the LDN archives

           

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor