Wednesday, Oct. 18

County presses for cooperation to complete audit          Send a link to a friend

[OCT. 18, 2006]  Logan County officials continue to be frustrated by the delay of the 2005 county audit.

The committee invited those involved in the accounting, computer and audit processes to attend the adjourned county meeting last night. Present were Logan County Treasurer Mary Ellen Bruns, John Weber from the auditor's office of Crowe Chizek and Co., and John McKeague of Tectura, consulting in the use of the Great Plains software.

Finance committee members anticipated there could be problems when the county rolled over to a new computer and software system two years ago. This is the first year that the figures from the new accounting system were sent to the auditor.

The audit process

  • The audit is formed from figures the county treasurer submits to the auditor after the fiscal year is closed out.

  • The county books have numerous funds that have detailed entries in those funds.

  • The auditor chooses select figures to enter, but not other figures from the books.

Last March, Crowe Chizek returned a long list of items and entries for Bruns to fix before the audit could be completed. The auditors' figures were not detailed enough for Bruns to know what figures had been included and what had not. It was up to Bruns to go back and figure out what needed to be put in and what needed to be pulled out.

An outside accounting professional was consulted to help interpret the problem and determine how to complete the list of items to the satisfaction of the auditor. It was determined that it would be necessary to go into the computer and change out some of the figures.

Tectura was asked in to assist in manually making the changes, and extra office help was hired to assist Bruns work at the lengthy task.

There was also a problem created by the manner that the new system closes out one year and opens a new year; it does not do it the same way as the old system, resulting in the figures not matching.

It is now eight months later and past due, and the audit is not completed.

Tuesday night, board member Bill Sahs asked for a spirit of cooperation. Both the Tectura and Crowe Chizek representatives were asked what could be expected on their parts in helping Bruns get the audit completed.

McKeague said that the accounting software is designed not be limited in its use, but that means that it requires decision-making on the entries that are made. He credited Bruns for knowing her job well and having the insight to identify the problems and find solutions.

He said that this is an accounting problem, not a software problem. Tectura is ready to assist in making the entry changes if asked, but accountants might be of better assistance in this situation.

He also recalled that the training on the county computer system was rushed two years ago because of the expiration date of the old software. Information migration and staff training that would normally take six months was done in three months. McKeague suggested that it might be helpful for Tectura to provide more training for the county staff on making entries and use of the system. This might prevent future problems.

From the auditor's side, Weber agreed to accept a list of manual changes.

Once the auditor's figures reconcile with the county figures, Weber said, they would still need to perform the customary fieldwork, where they go into the county departments and review their books. This takes three to five weeks and leads to a draft report.

[to top of second column]

This provided Bruns some relief. She said that it would still take some work, but she will be getting that list in order.

"All the figures are there," Bruns said. "It's just the way this system does things and finding how to apply them for the audit to be done. We're not changing any amounts, just getting them in the right place."

In a meeting earlier in the day, Bruns said that it appears as though Logan County is the only county in Illinois using full implementation of the Great Plains software. There are eight municipalities using it, though she does not know to what degree they use it; it might be in only one or more modules, she said.

This limits the professional resources she has to consult. She said she would often bypass the computer consultants and call a peer in another county to solve small difficulties.

She knows of only one other county using the Great Plains software, and they are in Wisconsin. Accounting and auditing requirements could be different for Wisconsin, but they are pleased with the product.

As the official documentation of the county revenues and expenditures, the audit serves several functions.

  • It is the primary resource of the county's financial condition.

  • The finance committee uses it as a guide to make future projections.

  • The previous year's audit is used to make the next fiscal year's budget.
    The 2005 audit would be used to set the 2007 fiscal year budget. The county fiscal year runs from Dec. 1 to Nov. 30.

  • The audit is also used in grant applications.
    The Logan County Health Department has two grant applications in process, for which they were allowed to temporarily use the 2004 audit. Those grants could be lost if the 2005 audit does not come through in time.

The health department's primary funding is from the state and federal grants. According to the administrator, Mark Hilliard, the department has been receiving extensions but does not know when those extensions might be terminated.

Jonathan Wright, assistant state's attorney, advised the board that Illinois statutes say the county should pass a new budget.

He confirmed when asked that the board can then amend the budget with a two-thirds vote, up or down, as needed. That is something that counties are allowed to do at any time, in case revenues should fall off.

The county has kept ties with the past auditor and is planning to consult with Andy Lascody to try to keep the process moving forward.

The finance chairman, Chuck Ruben, said: "I just want to make it perfectly clear that at no time was there any thought that there was anything wrong in the treasurer's office. It is strictly a technical issue and not a financial or anything like that."

He would not ask Bruns for a timeline. He knew that she would be working to get it done as quickly as possible.

[Jan Youngquist]

Past related articles


< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor