| 
			 
			Dear Taxpayers of CUD #23: 
			
			We, the member of Citizens for 
			Education, have made repeated attempts to retrieve information and 
			ask questions of our school board to no avail. The Citizens for 
			Education voted to use the news media as a way to inform all CUD #23 
			taxpayers of some of concerns we have that affects all taxpayers. 
			Our only goal is to seek the truth. Following are a few of the 
			topics for which we have expressed concern and requested 
			information: 
			
			1. Sandy Ellis was terminated from the 
			office of Superintendent of our district with no explanation to the 
			taxpayers. The rumor reports $300,000.00 (three hundred thousand 
			dollars) to $380,000 (three hundred eighty thousand dollars) 
			including a buyout of her contract with the district. All documents 
			pertaining to this issue were requested by Citizens for Education 
			and were denied with the exception of a previously released one page 
			of board meeting minutes in which her termination was accepted by 
			the board. We have been advised that all of these requested 
			documents cannot be sealed from the public because they document the 
			expenditure of taxpayers’ monies. In order to allocate money from 
			the school budget, board members must make a motion, there must be a 
			second, and a full roll call vote is recorded by individual names. 
			That said, the Ellis termination/buy-out was voted on by each school 
			board member serving at that time. As previously requested, we 
			respectfully request a full and complete accounting of the Supt. 
			Sandy Ellis termination as previously requested. 
            
			
              
			
			2. The budget for the new addition to 
			the high school building was approved by the school board for 
			$1,200,000 (one million two hundred thousand dollars) and is now 
			rumored to be over $2,400,000 (two million four hundred thousand 
			dollars). We do not feel the taxpayers have been properly informed 
			of such a drastic increase in the cost of this project. We 
			respectfully request a full and complete accounting of the costs 
			involved with the addition instead of continuing with the "pay as 
			you go" policy this school board has adopted. 
			
			3. The Citizens for Education 
			requested enrollment figures from the current administration three 
			times and each time a different set of numbers was reported. With 
			this information, our best guess is the high school enrollment will 
			fall below two hundred students in the next two to three years. Our 
			greatest fear is that the State of Illinois will mandate our merging 
			into a county high school because of an insufficient number of 
			students. At a meeting in February 2006 Supt. Phil Shelton responded 
			to this concern by saying, "We are discussing the junior high school 
			now, not the high school." The only responses from the school board 
			to this issue are "you cannot predict the future" and "you cannot 
			plan, only react." We have been informed privately that the 
			population of Mt. Pulaski really doesn’t care one way or another 
			about what happens to the schools. We respectfully request a five 
			year plan as well as a ten year plan for the future of CUD #23 
			schools from Supt. Shelton and the school board. 
			
			4. It has been rumored that too large 
			of a basement area for the new high school addition was excavated 
			and the dirt was given away at no cost. When this error was 
			discovered, it is our understanding that the school district paid 
			for moving the location of the new addition, purchased dirt to fill 
			the hole, and paid to fill the hole itself to the tune of a reported 
			$80,000 (eighty thousand dollars) to $190,000 (one hundred ninety 
			thousand dollars). We respectfully request an answer to each of 
			these questions: Why should the taxpayers foot the bill for this 
			significant error during construction? Why didn’t the engineer 
			and/or the contractor cover the financial aspects of this sizeable 
			error? Are there other errors made by the engineer and contractors 
			that we, as taxpayers, have had to pay for as well? 
			
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
              
			5. In the school financials we have 
			received, the school board appropriates between $4,000 (four 
			thousand dollars) and $6,000 (six thousand dollars) a year so the 
			members can attend the annual school board convention in Chicago. 
			Many school districts have opted out of this convention deeming it 
			as an unnecessary expense. It has been reported CUD #23 is facing a 
			$300,000 (three hundred thousand dollar) deficit in the 2006-2007 
			budget, but our school board claims they "have taken every cost 
			saving measure possible" including skipping one year of updating 
			computers in the schools. (They are currently back on their three 
			year rotation of the computer lease.) It has been rumored that not 
			all of the school board members and their families arrived on the 
			dates they had reserved a room, so the taxpayers paid for empty 
			hotel rooms. We respectfully request an answer to each of the 
			following questions: How is attendance at the school board 
			convention more important to the education of the children of this 
			school district than updating computers in the schools? What benefit 
			do we, as taxpayers, gain by the board members attending this 
			convention? Was any reimbursement personally made by any school 
			board members for their failure to attend any part of this 
			convention after they made reservations? If the school board members 
			are so frivolous in spending taxpayers’ monies in small matters how 
			can they be trusted in large matters? 
			
			6. The United States and State of 
			Illinois governments allow taxpayers access to information discussed 
			during open meetings. The Open Meetings Act requires access to 
			information if taxpayers request this information through the proper 
			channels. The Citizens for Education group has submitted numerous 
			requests and a few of these have been denied. As of June 2006 not 
			one of these requests has been brought to the open session of the 
			school board meetings for approval or denial. (See
			
			http://www.ag.state.il.us/ for information regarding the 
			Open Meetings Act.) One taxpayer of this school district requested 
			to address the school board and was denied the request to be on the 
			agenda because the topic of discussion was "too broad." We ask the 
			school board if they feel they are being responsive and respectful 
			of the taxpayers of CUD #23? If so, we respectfully disagree. 
			
			These questions are being sent to 
			every school board member as well as several media outlets. Our hope 
			is they will be read at the next scheduled school board meeting, if 
			we are allowed on the agenda, and the school board will answer these 
			questions so the truth will be revealed. We respectfully invite 
			everyone interested to attend the meeting in the Unit District #23 
			office on Monday, July 17, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. 
			
			Sincerely, 
			
			Citizens for Education 
			P.O. Box 285 
			Elkhart, IL 62634   
			
			From the LDN archives 
			
			
			
               |