|
The court also criticized Britain's use of "blanket and indiscriminate" storage. Civil liberties groups said the changes did not go far enough. Shami Chakrabarti, director of human rights group Liberty, said the proposals "don't distinguish between people who are under suspicion, people who are wholly innocent and those who are guilty." "The government is still trying to get away with the largest database possible, including holding the details of people who are wholly innocent of anything," she said. Chris Grayling, law and order spokesman for the opposition Conservatives, said the changes were "just not good enough."
"People in Britain should be innocent until proven guilty," he said. "Ministers are just trying to get away with as little as they possibly can instead of taking real action to remove innocent people from the DNA database." The proposed new rules, which are now open to public consultation, would not apply in Scotland, which destroys most samples from innocent suspects after three years.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor